Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

[DinkinFlicka]

The Epstein was never a big issue to me because I could see there was nothing there. All we have are conspiracy theorists trying to make something out of nothing.

This has to be a troll account.

 

[MurphyVol]

if there is no evidence of a crime, then how can a person be tried for a crime when no evidence of a crime being committed even exists?

Do you want to go on trial for bank robbery when there is zero evidence you committed bank robbery?

No evidence does not mean a crime was not committed, but as the Fed Prosecutor I have been quoting says evidence matters. People cannot be willy nilly be charged with crimes when there is no evidence of guilt.

A problem is we have evidence Biden committed financial crimes, Hilliary committed crimes, Obama committed crimes but they are not being charged and taken to court over those crimes as other people would have been.

Trump said frequently he was going to pursue charges against Hillary and lock her up. He's on chance #2 right now. And he once again has the resources to keep the promise of exposing all the millions of fake votes she received.

 

[jmacvols1]

No one is being prosecuted because their name exists in some files without actual evidence of wrongdoing in regards to Epstein. That's just a cope to excuse why they are afraid to release anything else. You're more worried about the reputations of billionaire elites than you are about abused children. Release it all.

If any billionaire did something wrong then he needs to be prosecuted but the problem is, as the Fed Prosecutor I have been quoting points out, there is no evidence. A name on some supposed list does not prove guilt. The prosecutor pointed out there is no video evidence of anyone doing anything wrong other than Epstein.

It appears you suffer from TDS. It is ashame that you were not this tenacious about justice being served when Hilliary committed crimes but was let go and not prosecuted. We have strong evidence Biden and his family committed financial crimes but you aren't concerned they are not being presecuted. Hunter Biden got his daddy's pardon for his crimes, are you losing sleep Hunter is not be prosecuted? Gabbard just released evidence Obama and his gang of outlaws made up a Russia hoax committing treason. Are you concerned Byrd murdered an unarmed woman but not convicted? Are you concerned Clinton wasn't prosecuted for raping woman? I could go on and on about crimes Dems have committed but not prosecuted that you are not worried about.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

The letter wasn’t that interesting. If Trump were significantly involved, his entire campaign wouldn’t have been calling for the release.

Trump campaign, day one orientation:

"Guys, bee tee dubs, don't mention the Epstein stuff. No reason in particuluar."

If the letter wasn't that interesting, why the suit?

 

[jmacvols1]

what proof do you have that billionaireMr X committed a crime on Epstein island?

 

[sonofUT62]

Who is the ominous “they”?

People who aren’t using electronic devices on Saturday and can’t defend themselves.

 

[sonofUT62]

Trump campaign, day one orientation:

"Guys, bee tee dubs, don't mention the Epstein stuff. No reason in particuluar."

If the letter wasn't that interesting, why the suit?

Because he’s a dip **** will zero impulse control and a large team of lawyers. That doesn’t equate to being on the “list”.

 

[sonofUT62]

This has to be a troll account.

I’m not sure it’s not a dupe/ second account. The claims of being able to see the future remind me of someone else’s recruiting takes.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Because he’s a dip **** will zero impulse control and a large team of lawyers. That doesn’t equate to being on the “list”.

I didn't say the letter equated to being on the list. I was contesting that the letter wasn't interesting.

 

[sonofUT62]

I didn't say the letter equated to being on the list. I was contesting that the letter wasn't interesting.

I’m just opining that the giant overreaction to the article is probably not indicative of being on the list.

 

[jmacvols1]

Trump said frequently he was going to pursue charges against Hillary and lock her up. He's on chance #2 right now. And he once again has the resources to keep the promise of exposing all the millions of fake votes she received.

It shows Trump is a bigger person than any Dem will ever be. Trump had corrupt trials against him, has ever right to go after real crooks like Hilliary. It was the 2020 election and Biden's fake 81 million votes Trump has talked about.

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

If any billionaire did something wrong then he needs to be prosecuted but the problem is, as the Fed Prosecutor I have been quoting points out, there is no evidence. A name on some supposed list does not prove guilt. The prosecutor pointed out there is no video evidence of anyone doing anything wrong other than Epstein.

It appears you suffer from TDS. It is ashame that you were not this tenacious about justice being served when Hilliary committed crimes but was let go and not prosecuted. We have strong evidence Biden and his family committed financial crimes but you aren't concerned they are not being presecuted. Hunter Biden got his daddy's pardon for his crimes, are you losing sleep Hunter is not be prosecuted? Gabbard just released evidence Obama and his gang of outlaws made up a Russia hoax committing treason. Are you conncerned Byrd murdered an unarmed woman but not convicted? Are you concerned Clinton wasn't presecuted for raping woman? I could go on and on about crimes Dems have committed but not presecuted that you are not worried about.

You are quoting a FORMER Far Right prosecutor who hasnt been a prosecutor in over a decade. He has stated multiple times in his substack thag he is making educated guesses and the person who would know just got fired....

Evidence clearly matters but it is clear the last three administrations lie like crazy about anything. When you lie as much as they have, you lose benefit of the doubt..

 

[sonofUT62]

It shows Trump is a bigger person than any Dem will ever be. Trump had corrupt trials against him, has ever right to go after real crooks like Hilliary. It was the 2020 election and Biden's fake 81 million votes Trump has talked about.

Then campaign on being a bigger person. (Which he’s not). Don’t campaign on getting justice and then chicken out. At some point he’s just a liar.

 

[volfanhill]

Can’t pretend to know the entirety of what each has said on the topic, but did they actually promote conspiracy or call for transparency?

I’ve for sure seen those people call for more transparency on the issue. Don Jr has probably went further. Idk that Vance or Patel have

“What possible interest would the U.S. government have in keeping Epstein’s clients secret? Oh...” tweeted the nation’s future vice president.”

And there are about a million instances of Bongino and Patel playing the “conspiracy theory” game

 

[jmacvols1]

You are quoting a FORMER Far Right prosecutor who hasnt been a prosecutor in over a decade. He has stated multiple times in his substack thag he is making educated guesses and the person who would know just got fired....

I made mention he HAD been a Fed Prosecutor so he would have more knowledge about how things like these work legally than a bunch of conspiracy theorists on social media looking for click bate to make money.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

I’m just opining that the giant overreaction to the article is probably not indicative of being on the list.

That's all fine and good but it comes down to this:

You can't go on about this for years and years, fire up your support base with it as a rallying flag, knowing through one way or another that there was no list, and then act like a frivolous little c*** when the time comes to make these discoveries transparent.

Regardless of how much time you (not you specifically) spend carrying water for the guy, you're just going to look like an intellectual equivalent of a skid mark from a fart that shouldn't have been trusted when you begin attempting to brush this aside for little more reason than to not look like the moron you are for picking this horse and sticking to it.

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

I made mention he HAD been a Fed Prosecutor so he would have more knowledge about how things like these work legally than a bunch of conspiracy theorists on social media looking for click bate to make money.

He is looking to make money too from click baiting the right.

Yes, he knows more about the law than an average person but you are making it like he is privy to the details, which he is not....

 

[DinkinFlicka]

It shows Trump is a bigger person than any Dem will ever be. Trump had corrupt trials against him, has ever right to go after real crooks like Hilliary. It was the 2020 election and Biden's fake 81 million votes Trump has talked about.

And here's EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

Don't be like this guy. This is what happens when you overdose on pride and **** yourself up in lieu of just saying "you know what? I was wrong" years ago.

 

[Vol8188]

“What possible interest would the U.S. government have in keeping Epstein’s clients secret? Oh...” tweeted the nation’s future vice president.”

And there are about a million instances of Bongino and Patel playing the “conspiracy theory” game

Thanks. I know almost nothing about Bongino and hadn’t seen that Vance tweet. Was wildly excited about him after he destroyed Walz in the debate, but since I’ve been very luke warm on him

 

[MontyPython]

Lmfao yes because enigmas and gamines are 100% words Trump uses in his daily life.

More likely answer is someone on his staff wrote it on his behalf

Mmhhhmmm. Perhaps.

But when Donald signs it, he takes responsibility for all that's written.

So regardless of who drafted it, Trump agreed with what was written.

 

[sonofUT62]

That's all fine and good but it comes down to this:

You can't go on about this for years and years, fire up your support base with it as a rallying flag, knowing through one way or another that there was no list, and then act like a frivolous little c*** when the time comes to make these discoveries transparent.

Regardless of how much time you (not you specifically) spend carrying water for the guy, you're just going to look like an intellectual equivalent of a skid mark from a fart that shouldn't have been trusted when you begin attempting to brush this aside for little more reason than to not look like the moron you are for picking this horse and sticking to it.

Yes. That’s what I wrote on 3, 896. I agree with you.

 

[Vol8188]

Trump campaign, day one orientation:

"Guys, bee tee dubs, don't mention the Epstein stuff. No reason in particuluar."

If the letter wasn't that interesting, why the suit?

Because Trump is sensitive and proclaims it’s not an authentic letter. It’s for sure not written in a way Trump speaks. I think it’s probably authentic, but just written by a staffer.

But they’ve released information that was previously unreleased and campaigned on doing so. If he were greatly involved like many want to believe, they wouldn’t have brought the topic up in the first place

 

[whodeycin85]

I never said Epstein files are a hoax, those files do exist. What I have questioned and others have questioned, as the Fed Prosecutor I have quoted has questioned the validity of a list of names. Does a list even exist? If it does is it valid or made up? Why would a criminal keep a list of his crimes? What do you do about people's who name is on the list? Can you prove they did something illegal? Could there be names on the list of innocent people who did nothing wrong?

Go back and look at the video I posted of Trump where he said he would release Epstein files but they would have to be looked at because in files like that there are phony things.....that list if exist could be phony, what was in the files that have been tampered with, destroyed by who knows.

Your dealing with theater kid who thinks there is a master list on a hidden drawer or a CPU file that need hacking that will reveal all wrongdoing in a nice now... just like CSI, blue blood and all the other crime shows they consume.

 

[Vol8188]

People who aren’t using electronic devices on Saturday and can’t defend themselves.

Given his posting history, I have no doubt that’s who he means

 

[jmacvols1]

Then campaign on being a bigger person. (Which he’s not). Don’t campaign on getting justice and then chicken out. At some point he’s just a liar.

Epstein list was not on Trump's campaign list, that has been demonstrated many times it was not on his 47 Agenda list.

Look at the video below I have posted multiple times. Trump made an issue out of releasing the J6 files and Kennedy files but he CLEARLY said "less so" with the Epstein files. How can anyone listen to what Trump says here then claim Trump made a big issue out of releasing the Epstein files when he was already leary that things in the file were phony, it had to be looked at because "you do not want to effect people's lives with a lot of phony stuff".