That was attached to another bill..And I have a bridge to sell you.
Also....Republicans are blocking it. Republicans alone. Rules voted 5-7 to deny the call to release the full Epstein files. Guess who were the 7? Republicans.
Yea, he attached it to a bill on cryptocurrency regulation.That was attached to another bill..
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025.
Why not present it as. standa
Alone act??? Then go after the GOP..but not for not adding to a completely different bill.
Nothing important, really. I can't imagine more than one or two people quits his job over it. It makes sense that Epstein might have had airtight evidence to convict a bunch of people for statutory rape, but there are a billion people just like them ready to take their places if any of them are ever prosecuted for it. If everybody in Congress quit tomorrow, the voters would find people to replace them.So what will the fallout be if in fact it emeges that there is a list, even if Trump is not on it?
Nothing important, really. I can't imagine more than one or two people quits his job over it. It makes sense that Epstein might have had airtight evidence to convict a bunch of people for statutory rape, but there are a billion people just like them ready to take their places if any of them are ever prosecuted for it. If everybody in Congress quit tomorrow, the voters would find people to replace them.
The more and more I read into it, I do think there isn't much of anything there...for instance we have flight logs and names...Hardley incriminating...we have tapes of child porn found on the island. Very few if any lawsuits have made it court and those that have are blocked from access....several accusers have failed to follow thru on their accusations....we have a bunch of circumstantial accusations. Problem is whether you risk the issues of releasing names of powerful people whom may or may not be involved but have had interactions with JE. And with the lack of integrity in our media, there is no innocent until proven guilty..its guilty until proven innocent and even then It never goes away..If he was trying to protect himself he would have never initiated it to begin with. His mind changed.
several of the accusers have been clinton-cided. pretty easy to avoid being found guilty if you keep killing off those making the accusations.The more and more I read into it, I do think there isn't much of anything there...for instance we have flight logs and names...Hardley incriminating...we have tapes of child porn found on the island. Very few if any lawsuits have made it court and those that have are blocked from access....several accusers have failed to follow thru on their accusations....we have a bunch of circumstantial accusations. Problem is whether you risk the issues of releasing names of powerful people whom may or may not be involved but have had interactions with JE. And with the lack of integrity in our media, there is no innocent until proven guilty..its guilty until proven innocent and even then It never goes away..
That all said..I say redact the victims and release the anything but the child porn and let the cards fall...
True but there is a ton that haven't..and failed to produce the evidence they claimed. And let be honest if there was incriminating evidence against Trump (the DNC have would released ot) or against DNC member (Biden Admim would have destroyed it). And it wouldn't be the first time a Dem destroyed evidence and got away with it.several of the accusers have been clinton-cided. pretty easy to avoid being found guilty if you keep killing off those making the accusations.
A lone Republican has risked President Donald Trump's ire after voting with Democrats in a bid to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.
California Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna pushed an amendment to upcoming crypto legislation that would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all Epstein-related documents.
Bondi would have to share the files on a 'publicly accessible website' within 30 days of passage.
However, the effort was foiled, failing five to seven, during a Monday night vote by the House Rules Committee, a group of lawmakers that generally sign off on legislation before it gets a final vote on the House floor.
![]()
One Republican sides with Democrats to release Jeffrey Epstein files
A lone Republican has risked President Donald Trump's ire after voting with Democrats in a bid to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.www.dailymail.co.uk
You had your opportunity. Frankly I don't GAS what happens with the list (if there is one) at this point. Release it, burn it... I don't care.
The real problem here is that no one really cares except for you TDS laden folks.
Show us the Epstein list. Let's get down to the real bad ass stuff instead of this Mickey Mouse ****.
Not true. If Trump diddled underage girls on Epstein Island, we have the right to know and he should go to prison with everybody else that did.
Release the list.
I just hope the Epstein list gets released. I can guarantee that it is the nuclear option the democrats would be using this very moment if Trump were on it. They aren't, so he isn't. I'll bet they are terrified.
I mean, the quote is real. The only thing doctored in the image is Kirk's embellished face, and it's hilarious.You got too much free time