Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#3,053
#3,053
n_huffhines said:
Here's some critical thinking...why do you all believe there is a list in the first place? You say the first Trump admin had access to it. Nobody official ever said that it existed, so where are you getting that from?

For several years, through multiple admins, this had all been based on public speculation until February when Pam Bondi said she had it on her desk, and Elon Musk said Trump was on it. That's the only word we've ever heard from anybody official indicating that it existed. Musk is not trustworthy. I don't think Bondi is either. So here I am critically thinking, arriving in the middle where I wisely say, "IDK."
Click to expand...

How is Giselle in prison then? Who were these girls trafficked too? Air?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boca Vol and whodeycin85
#3,054
#3,054
NEO said:
How is Giselle in prison then? Who were these girls trafficked too? Air?
Click to expand...

Sounds like they are expecting us to believe that no one else was really involved except Epstein, she was getting girls just for him. But we already pretty much know for fact that isn't true with the Prince Andrew stuff.

I find it all very dubious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, LouderVol, MemphisVol77 and 5 others
#3,057
#3,057
MercyPercy said:
Sounds like they are expecting us to believe that no one else was really involved except Epstein, she was getting girls just for him. But we already pretty much know for fact that isn't true with the Prince Andrew stuff.

I find it all very dubious.
Click to expand...

Extremely dubious.
 
#3,059
#3,059
Has anyone asked the Trump administration specifically about the contradictions in how the story evolved over time regarding the "suicide"? We were told cameras weren't working, guards were asleep, dog ate their homework, etc. Now we have the full video (except it appears to be blatantly cut). Did they just find the misplaced tape under someone's desk? Oopsies?

Bondi said there was like thousands of hours of footage and apparently that was all just Epstein? How did he have time to do anything else?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
#3,060
#3,060
You either accept Bondi's claim today that "what I meant" was that the client list, on her desk and that she was in process of reviewing, wasn't actually a client list but instead was the general file, or you don't accept that.

I have no way to know, but I am skeptical of her explanation. That file has to be huge and how one confuses that with a client list, especially knowing the level of interest out there on this, is ... dubious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
#3,061
#3,061
A conspiracy theorist who believes there is a list and subsequently applied Occam's razor instead of coping by inventing another theory.

1752008976437.png
 
#3,062
#3,062
lawgator1 said:
You either accept Bondi's claim today that "what I meant" was that the client list, on her desk and that she was in process of reviewing, wasn't actually a client list but instead was the general file, or you don't accept that.

I have no way to know, but I am skeptical of her explanation. That file has to be huge and how one confuses that with a client list, especially knowing the level of interest out there on this, is ... dubious.
Click to expand...
I'd guess she hadn't looked at anything at that point in Feb. She thought she had all the material and was just referencing the file since during the interview she also said she had the JFK file and MLK file and that's all going to be reviewed in the same sentence. Maybe she thought a client list was in the file.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zues1
#3,063
#3,063
TheDeeble said:
I'd guess she hadn't looked at anything at that point in Feb. She thought she had all the material and was just referencing the file since during the interview she also said she was going to review the JFK file and MLK file in the same sentence. Maybe she thought a client list was in the file.
Click to expand...


Possible. Sloppy, and irresponsible as it has set the Loomer/Jones wing of MAGA world on fire. But possible.
 
#3,064
#3,064
The child porn stance by Bondi although accurate, is the cover for who’s being protected. This won’t go away and will only intensify in how it was handled and covered up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#3,068
#3,068
Boca Vol said:
If Trump’s name was on n the list, don’t you think it would’ve been used by the Dems in the last few years? Considering all the stupid sh:.t with the sham trials…You don’t think “actual” proof wouldn’t sway voters? Dipsh!t!
Click to expand...


Yes except that his might not be the only name.
 
#3,070
#3,070
NEO said:
Have to know there was a client to convict. That in itself means there is some form of names.
Click to expand...

Bro, you are really stretching at this point. They don't actually have to know the names of clients to convict. This is not written into the law. You're just making up **** to make the ultimate reach. If victims say they were trafficked and they don't know the names of the clients, a jury can convict. What are we talking about here?
 
#3,071
#3,071
Tucker Carlson believes the government is 'covering up' the Epstein files to protect US and Israeli intelligence services.

The former Fox News host is leading a MAGA backlash against the Trump admins' failure to deliver on its promise to release Epstein's anticipated 'client list.'

On his podcast today, Tucker said it was 'obvious' that Bondi was 'covering up crimes'.

Amid mounting scrutiny over Trump's handling of the controversy, Carlson said he is not convinced that the president was covering his own alleged ties to Epstein, and felt the reason is hinged on espionage.

'I don't think he's that guy, actually,' Carlson said of Trump. 'I don't think he likes creepy sex stuff.'

Rather, Carlson floated a more sinister plot to protect the US and Israeli intelligence agencies was driving Trump's response.

'The only other explanation that I can think of... is that intel services are at the very center of this story, U.S. and Israeli, and they're being protected,' he said.


'I think that seems like the most obvious.'

Carlson waded into the controversy hours after Elon Musk launched into another attack on MAGA world by claiming that former Trump advisor Steve Bannon is implicated in the Epstein files.

Musk also alleged weeks ago that Trump is in the Epstein files, saying that 'is the real reason they have not been made public.'

But on Carlson's show, his guest Sagaar Enjeti, the host of Breaking Points, agreed that intelligence services likely had a role in the growing scandal over the release of the files.

Enjeti pointed to reports in 2021 that alleged that federal prosecutors had chosen not to prosecute pedophilia cases within the CIA.


'There have been multiple documented cases of pedophilia inside of the CIA perpetrated by CIA officers,' he said.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Tucker Carlson jaw-dropping theory on why Trump is hiding Epstein list

Carlson waded into the controversy surrounding Epstein after Trump's administration issued a memo claiming that the pedophile had 'no client list' and that his death in 2019 was a suicide.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
#3,074
#3,074
Epstein was an intelligence asset. It's that simple. Maybe there wasn't a real client list, IDK, but there is no way the future CIA director was meeting with him multiple times and there wasn't something very secret and dirty there as far as intelligence goes. It stinks badly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#3,075
#3,075
Boca Vol said:
You think the MSM would care? They would hang Trump out to dry if they could and simply ignore the other names.
Click to expand...


The MSM doesn't control the list.

Look, let's take Bondi at her word and the "file" was on her desk, not a "list." Didn't Trump and his campaign repeatedly promise to release it all ???

They did. They absolutely did. But now, you've got the AG and Trump playing word games and shaming anyone who dares ask what is going on here ?

Clearly, something is.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top