Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

People all across Europe has been fired, resigned and even investigations opened up. Prince Andrew literally had his titles stripped bcuz of his involvement with Epstein. But in America we cover up for the pedophiles

He lost his titles before any of the new information. The grand conspiracy you’re hoping for isn’t there.

The most interesting thing I’ve seen is that Peter Atia is a POS. Outside of that, we haven’t learned much of interest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
He lost his titles before any of the new information. The grand conspiracy you’re hoping for isn’t there.

The most interesting thing I’ve seen is that Peter Atia is a POS. Outside of that, we haven’t learned much of interest.
Whatever you say

Keep referring to the raping and trafficking of children as simply a creepy dude exploiting teenagers. Sicko
 
Whatever you say

Keep referring to the raping and trafficking of children as simply a creepy dude exploiting teenagers. Sicko
The only reason this dude keeps this up is because he's got some sort of Israel fetish and it's beyond doubt this whole operation was a Mossad job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newarkvol
They didnt know this until July of 2025?
They didn't speak out on it until then. They knew it beforehand. Do you really believe that not speaking about it publicly until after the fact is a disingenuous stance? That's not not really any substantive support for your position. Of course that is if you understand that it's not prudent to speak of such things, until you have documented evidence on a piece of paper
 
They didn't speak out on it until then. They knew it beforehand. Do you really believe that not speaking about it publicly until after the fact is a disingenuous stance?

You can only speak of anything “after the fact”. The issue is as they were about a decade late.

That's not not really any substantive support for your position. Of course that is if you understand that it's not prudent to speak of such things, until you have documented evidence on a piece of paper

They didn’t have the evidence in July of 2025. If Massie did, he could have disclosed it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Last edited:
It wasn't until they both gave up on the idea that the Trump administration was going to do what members of his administration said they would do.

They both reached that conclusion immediately after the Iran attack that they both opposed.

You don’t find that timing odd?
 
It wasn't until they both gave up on the idea that the Trump administration was going to do what members of his administration said they would do.


The same thing happened in the first Trump term. Eventually his supporters within the government realize how malevolent and incompetent he is and they turn on him. And he goes nuts. And it just gets worse.

If by the summer the Dems look like they are going to be competitive in the House there could be a mass defection of members afraid to be tied to him too closely.

The USS Trump is taking on water and is in peril.
 
You can only speak of anything “after the fact”. The issue is as they were about a decade late.



They didn’t have the evidence in July of 2025. If Massie did, he could have disclosed it.
Stop deflecting away from the incompetent AG making a fool of herself, AGAIN, in a Congressional hearing. You're literally defending a shat show by trying to deflect to Massie's position. In anywhere other than a right wing echo chamber, you would be exponentially laughed at more than you are in here by everyone at least as smart as you
 
Stop deflecting away from the incompetent AG making a fool of herself, AGAIN, in a Congressional hearing. You're literally defending a shat show by trying to deflect to Massie's position. In anywhere other than a right wing echo chamber, you would be exponentially laughed at more than you are in here by everyone at least as smart as you

The conversation literally started by you quoting me about Massie. Now I’m just deflecting from a topic we weren’t discussing?

That makes sense
 
They both reached that conclusion immediately after the Iran attack that they both opposed.

You don’t find that timing odd?

Well this happened July 7th



This on July 18th



And this from her on July 25th




So yes I think you are way off base
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
Well this happened July 7th



This on July 18th



And this from her on July 25th




So yes I think you are way off base

The files seem to confirm there’s no list. If it hadn’t been two people both opposed to his foreign policy openly who then both took up this cross, I would believe it more. Gay Graham from SC for example.

I don’t believe Massie nor MTG believed there was a literal list.
 
The files seem to confirm there’s no list. If it hadn’t been two people both opposed to his foreign policy openly who then both took up this cross, I would believe it more. Gay Graham from SC for example.

I don’t believe Massie nor MTG believed there was a literal list.
Well Bondi stated she was reviewing one. They don't have access to the info. Why would anyone think she was lying unless you just assume the admin is FOS?

Also, the timeline I laid out clearly shows how the admin opened themselves up to mass criticism by everyone independently of Trumps Iran actions. The timeline for the criticism aligns perfectly
 
Well Bondi stated she was reviewing one. They don't have access to the info. Why would anyone think she was lying unless you just assume the admin is FOS, which is a wise move, but his supporters don't believe that

Bondi is an idiot. That’s been proven numerous times. But I’ve seen the interview and it seemed clear to me she was saying the Epstein files were on here desk to review. Couldn’t imagine a singular list would require any significant level of review.

However she should have been more careful in what she said (something she’s horrific at). Still the conspiracy theorist (MTG) and political opportunist (Massie) ran with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Well Bondi stated she was reviewing one. They don't have access to the info. Why would anyone think she was lying unless you just assume the admin is FOS?

Also, the timeline I laid out clearly shows how the admin opened themselves up to mass criticism by everyone independently of Trumps Iran actions. The timeline for the criticism aligns perfectly

It also aligns perfectly for Congress members who were looking for something after the Iran attack to latch onto. Does it not?
 
Well Bondi stated she was reviewing one. They don't have access to the info. Why would anyone think she was lying unless you just assume the admin is FOS?

Also, the timeline I laid out clearly shows how the admin opened themselves up to mass criticism by everyone independently of Trumps Iran actions. The timeline for the criticism aligns perfectly
The level of gaslighting is insane
 

Advertisement



Back
Top