Honestly, I don't get why people are so against him. I understand that 6-6 at Purdue isn't something people get giddy over, but if you look deeper, I think this guy's gonna be a winner.
This article from Feb '16* (if I'm not mistaken, when I first found the article that's what it said, but now it says from 2 years ago) ranks the Big 10 recruiting classes from the previous 4 years, i.e. at the very least it's the jr., & sr. players Brohm is currently coaching. Purdue ranks dead last. Dead. Last. 0 5 stars, 2 4 stars. They went 6-6 in his first year. 4 of the 6 losses are to ranked teams. The 2 other losses are by a combined 3 points. 6-6 in his first season at a program with ZERO talent is pretty fecking amazing, honestly.
His three seasons at WKU, he went 30-10, with 5 of those losses in his first season. 12-2 in his second season, 10-3 in his third season. People say he won on the backs of Willie Taggart and Bobby Petrino there. Willie Taggart's record in 3 seasons at WKU...16-20. He peaked at 7-5. Petrino's one season there...8-4. He did better there than both of his predecessors.
Hate on him all you want, at this point, we'd be lucky to get him. And personally, a few years down the line, I think we'd be really happy we did.
Flame on.
*Link to article...
Dienhart: A look back at Big Tens last four recruiting classes << Big Ten Network