Here is my take, in the games where the O line performed best and established some kind of protection and some run game(UK,AU) he performed exceptional, on games that the team didnt play effectively, there was no pass pro and no run game(Uf,VU) from the o line, those were his worst games. Now I certainly understand that correlation doesnt equate to causation, but those that continue to ignore the other variables in a team game and blame him for the lack of team results, are either intellectually dishonest and have an agenda, or are ignorant and haven't actually looked at it in depth, they just think they can have an opinion without any evidence to back it.