The key to this is that in the business world, your competition evolves. You cannot keep an outdated system while your competition upgrades and moves forward. Look at the successful programs recently in the SEC. They're all new coaches with new styles to the conference. Miles, Richt, Meyer. Our system in all practicality is outdated. I know of the loyalty to Fulmer and where he got us but where do you draw the line? Loyalty to someone who now puts us into the second tier in the conference or the desire to jump ahead to at least an equal in the conference with newer systems? I think we've cashed in the loyalty factor for Fulmer by keeping him here this long.
We are at a crossroads. We have no respect nationally. Sure, who cares about the press? But what of recruiting? We either got top recruits and did little with them or get second or third tier recruits and did little with them. All the signs are showing. Few teams fear us anymore. We lose at home. We lose bowl games. We lose to top 25 teams. We cannot beat the best in our conference. Our recruits have dropped off. Etc. Etc. We are solidly in the second tier of the conference and the division. We gave Fulmer the chance to make it right with some coaching changes. We excused the young, inexperienced player line only to see other teams with the same issues pound us.
Where do we draw the line? Where do we say enough is enough? How far into a hole do we dig ourselves into? Yes, I know. We're winning more than we're losing and at least getting to bowl games. Well so are quite a few second and third tier teams. Is that where we want to be? Do we want to be the perennial pick for the Swisher Urinal Screen Bowl?