Israel vs Palestinians II

I stopped reading after the first one because; The very first one they quote starts off the verse before with saying only wage war against those who wage war against you first and do not exceeds limits because God does not like transgressors. Also goes on to say if they cease to stop the war because God is forgiving and merciful.

It’s easy to take sentences out of context to use them for an agenda

I cant help you if you refuse to read past the 1st quote and refuse to read a relatively short book for yourself. We call that. "willingly ignorant" in Christianity (2Peter 3:5) but that verse only applies to God's Word ...not that "Murder the Infidels -guidebook to world domination through deception, infiltration, child predation, and annilhilation."
 
I cant help you if you refuse to read past the 1st quote and refuse to read a relatively short book for yourself. We call that. "willingly ignorant" in Christianity (2Peter 3:5) but that verse only applies to God's Word ...not that "Murder the Infidels -guidebook to world domination through deception, infiltration, child predation, and annilhilation."
Maybe you missed where I said I’ve read plenty of it, and then corrected a sentence that was taken out of context and told you what it actually said.

But like you said “it’s basically just the Old Testament” so you just not be a fan of that either
 
Good gawd how many times are they going to post the same debunked bulllllll ****

LMAO, it wasn't debunked. You fell for stupid Breitbart BS.

You can complain that there was no discussion, but that isn't rigging it. 500 people had 30 days to vote against the resolution to call out Israel for genocide, and only 20 did.

OMG, an anonymous body posted the resolution? So what. Who cares? It doesn't change how you would vote if you want to make a statement that Israel is not committing genocide. What on earth does that have to do with anything? Vote yes or no. The person posing the question doesn't matter.

The fact that it was an anonymous body and no discussion allowed leads me to believe it is somebodies who probably didn't even vote, they just knew the way the vote would go. They didn't want to go on the record. They didn't want a discussion where anybody would be wondering why they didn't say anything one way or another. And then they didn't vote. But they got the outcome they wanted. Ipso, facto, it's someone who believes it's genocide but can't bring themselves to publicly call out Israel.

Or the opposite is true and they were wrong about the way the vote would go.
 
Last edited:
Also, I love the idea that if we introduce a potential groupthink problem, the results are going to somehow be better than aggregating what the experts thought independently?

Isn't a discussion going to rig it towards whoever has the most influence on the group? How does it unrig anything? It only can do the opposite and bias it.
 
Also, I love the idea that if we introduce a potential groupthink problem, the results are going to somehow be better than aggregating what the experts thought independently?

Isn't a discussion going to rig it towards whoever has the most influence on the group? How does it unrig anything? It only can do the opposite and bias it.
Or, some “experts” may have additional data points to consider.

Interesting that a prolific message board poster thinks open discussion leads to less informed opinions….I’ll just leave it at that.
 
Stop reading right here.
You’ve posted wayyyyyy too much debunked nonsense to start a post towards anyone like that.

You’re the king of falling for propaganda.
I actually feel sorry for you
Antisemite logic:

America kills a million Iraqi civilians - not a genocide

Saudi Arabia kills 300,000 Yemen civilians - not a genocide

China puts a million Uyghurs in concentration camps - not a genocide

Israel fights existential war against 40,000 Hamas fighters - genocide
 
Kids are so resilient. Things you love to see.
Gaza 3 days ago.

Hoping for their sake Hamas surrenders and releases all the hostages and ends the genocide on their own people.



Children in Gaza learning breakdance with the dance group Camps Breakerz, a community organization founded in 2004 by brothers Moh Ghraiz and Ahmed Alghariz.

The group uses dance and art to represent the Palestinian people and highlight the ongoing genocide.
 
Also, I love the idea that if we introduce a potential groupthink problem, the results are going to somehow be better than aggregating what the experts thought independently?

Isn't a discussion going to rig it towards whoever has the most influence on the group? How does it unrig anything? It only can do the opposite and bias it.
Is diversity a strength or not?? Or does that only apply to skin color and not thought? Groupthink is designed for diversity of thought..so not allowing debate is going against that..and allowing propaganda and false facts (that you post a lot);to be used.
 
Or, some “experts” may have additional data points to consider.

Interesting that a prolific message board poster thinks open discussion leads to less informed opinions….I’ll just leave it at that.
Diversity isn't a strength now when it's the evil Jews being discussed. And not minority criminals.
 



Probably should have annexed the territory back in 1967.

Nothing has worked with the Arabs in Judea and Samaria so it’s time to try a different approach.
 



Probably should have annexed the territory back in 1967.

Nothing has worked with the Arabs in Judea and Samaria so it’s time to try a different approach.


People will post **** like this while also pretending the war on Gaza is only about the hostages.
 
I joined the organization as a “genocide scholar,” It turns out literally anyone can join and vote on matters that make international headlines—like the resolution claiming Israel is committing genocide.

IMG_9112.jpeg
The Times of Israel even picked up the story.
IMG_9113.jpeg

Career change
IMG_9111.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
People will post **** like this while also pretending the war on Gaza is only about the hostages.
Who is pretending it’s just about the hostages?

Were the terrorist groups pretending when they committed October 7?

Are they pretending when they say they will do it again and again?

Security for Israel is no joke, and must do what is necessary.
 
Who is pretending it’s just about the hostages?

Were the terrorist groups pretending when they committed October 7?

Are they pretending when they say they will do it again and again?

Security for Israel is no joke, and must do what is necessary.
"What is 'necessary'" being killing six figures' worth of Palestinians and displacing seven figures' more
 
"Between 2% and 5% of the population have been killed, 60% to 70% of them civilians. A third of those killed are children. Over 1,000 of those killed are children below the age of one.

So, what you're saying is that, in the history of urban warfare, this is one of the most effective efforts at reducing civilian casualties as a share of the whole?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top