I'd say yes, but what constitutes a "signature" win is very subjective and some have a high threshold. It may not quite be a signature win, but it's very close if not.
It's a very big win, important to our program comeback, and speaks volumes of the progress under Pruitt.
Would anyone consider this a signature win if it was against the # 11 team in the nation, and it not be against Kentucky? Take it for what it's worth and don't circumstance it for anything less.
I need a definition of "signature win". Is it in terms of historical significant or recent history? Heck, I don't know, but for tonight this feels pretty darn good.
It was a great and much needed win. But man i just don’t think i can stand the thought of elevating KY to “signature win” status, especially since they haven’t won here since 1984.
I would definitely call it an impressive win though.
so by definition, this is a signature win. Take off your Orange Glasses. This was #11 Kentucky. They beat UF in the Swamp (Who boat raced us in Neyland). This is, by your definition, a signature win.
How high would UK need to be ranked in order to qualify as a signature win? What the eff is a signature win anyway? We beat the #11 team in the country. Enjoy it Vol fans.
My goodness, we may actually make a bowl game this year.
Yes its a signature win. Is it quite as big as Auburn? No. But still a signature win. Especially given what we were last year. People saying oh well its just KY, that doesnt fly. They were #11.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.