Big Orange Junky
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2008
- Messages
- 234
- Likes
- 15
None of those camera angles show the indisputable evidence that is required by rule to overturn a call. You can put the pieces of several different angles together and pretty much know for certain he never really held it, but that's just not the way replay works. Without a close up camera angle from the side that shows the recievers hands and the ball, that call would have stood, even if everybody, even the officials pretty much knew he didn't hold it.
Well the NCAA disagrees with you. They had a "clarification" about the rules after that and basically said a player has to do more than just touch a ball to call it a catch.
The call was that bad. It wasn't even close. Even in slomo he didn't do more than touch the ball and everybody knew it.
It would have been overturned with replay even with the angles they had because there was definately indisputable evidence that he didn't catch the ball, the ball touched his hands and went right on through.
Now Florida could have scored on the next play, or they could have fumbled. Who knows but the official made sure they didn't have to do it.