Is Tereshinski Coming Back A Big Deal?

#26
#26
Fadeproof said:
LOL. Come on you know you these schedules are setup way in advance and how many people was picking USC to upset us?

All that said excuses are the tools of the incompetent so I will hush now.
Click to expand...

If you all hold the Vols to 6.8 points, I'll truly be impressed.
 
#29
#29
VOLracerx said:
you can't resally say that either...that would be like saying that you can only look at our defensive stats from the memphis and marshall games. I mean are you really tellingme that you consider WK, SC, UAB, COL, and Ole Miss a fair judgement of your defense ability???
Click to expand...

No thats why I said that you guys will be our biggest test to date. As for the stats I was reffering to the CU game and there QB I think he was responsible for 230 of their total yards. I would say he caused most of the problems for our D. Though I still think it is impressive to hold any teams, no matter who, to less than a touchdown a game.
 
#31
#31
I am glad Joe T is back... the more QB's, the greater the controversy and confusion.

It appeared that UGA tried the same thing last week as UT did most of the year last year- prep two QB's. Now they're adding another guy?

A starter in CFB needs 80% of the practice reps to get ready for a quality opponent. If the reps are split 3 ways this week by UGA, they'll have their worst offensive performance of the year... and that's saying a great deal.

As for the Colorado defense... if one running QB can do all that then UT's offensive weapons should do a good bit of damage.

Maybe the part that should concern Dawg fans the most is that UT will have the best offensive line they've faced in addition to the best skill players. I'm not saying that the OL has arrived... just that they are better than anyone UGA has faced.

I actually expected UGA to be much better at this point.

As Fadeproof said, it's football and anything can happen... but I really thought by this point UGA would be a real threat to blow UT out. Now, unless UGA plays much better or UT plays much worse, UT is more of a threat to blow UGA out.
 
#34
#34
Fadeproof said:
Good post and I agree with most of it. Do you think that your offense at 75% is good enough against our D?
Click to expand...
yes, only because if we score more than 23 or 24 pts, i'm not convinced UGA can score more than that given how their offense has played of late. and your D while good, holding us to 23 or 24 pts really coulnd't be considered bad given that we are averaging well over 30 a game. it could be the difference of giving up 1 or 2 big plays that turn in to scores for us. That may be enough. i don't see us lining up and just beating you by pounding out 80+ yard drives at 6 or 7 minutes a click...now that would be great mind you, but from what i've seen from our offense against the best d we've played so far, i'm not convinced we're capable of that just yet with our offensive line.

all that said, and i've said this before...this is assuming that UGA continues to play like they have offensively, and so do we. I'm still not convinced that the UGA team we've seen the past two weeks is in fact the REAL UGA team. We all know how good of a coach Richt is preceived to be, and to see a team of his make so many mistakes, is well, uncharacterisc of his UGA teams.
OWB said:
You know what that reminds me of? Rick Clausen.
Click to expand...
same here...and he beat LSU at LSU...so why can't Joe T beat TN at home???
 
#35
#35
JoeT sucks. He became qb by default in spring practice. I think secretly Richt was glad he got hurt because then he could do what he wanted to do all along...put Stafford in. But when Stafford struggled as bad as he has, it gave Richt a bailout...he wouldnt be shown benching the senior qb because of injury.

Joe T never grabbed the #1 spot before his injury. Every game, every practice Richt would say it was up for grabs. And the Western Kentucky game did nothing but make the door for #1 open further. Joe T is starting this week not because of how good he was before his injury, but because how bad the qbs have been after his injury.
 
#36
#36
Fadeproof said:
True my only concern being a Dawg is can he get enough velocity on his passes to not get picked of. If he can then I all will be fine. If not you will see Stafford, because what is a large set of plays going to do you if you cant run the effectively.
Click to expand...


UGA will have to watch for becoming predictable. JoeT will be the game manager, while Stafford or Cox will come in when the deep threat is needed, just like Tebow is going to run when he comes in. It won't be difficult to know what is going on if the Dawgs pattern that way.
 
#37
#37
TravisHenryCBlockedMe said:
JoeT sucks. He became qb by default in spring practice. I think secretly Richt was glad he got hurt because then he could do what he wanted to do all along...put Stafford in. But when Stafford struggled as bad as he has, it gave Richt a bailout...he wouldnt be shown benching the senior qb because of injury.

Joe T never grabbed the #1 spot before his injury. Every game, every practice Richt would say it was up for grabs. And the Western Kentucky game did nothing but make the door for #1 open further. Joe T is starting this week not because of how good he was before his injury, but because how bad the qbs have been after his injury.
Click to expand...


Net...Net

aka - UT'05
 
#38
#38
yes, only because if we score more than 23 or 24 pts, i'm not convinced UGA can score more than that given how their offense has played of late. and your D while good, holding us to 23 or 24 pts really coulnd't be considered bad given that we are averaging well over 30 a game. it could be the difference of giving up 1 or 2 big plays that turn in to scores for us. That may be enough. i don't see us lining up and just beating you by pounding out 80+ yard drives at 6 or 7 minutes a click...now that would be great mind you, but from what i've seen from our offense against the best d we've played so far, i'm not convinced we're capable of that just yet with our offensive line.
Click to expand...
I just dont see UT scoring 24 points. Not that they are not able or that our D is dominating. Just to the use of the new clock rules and I think CMR will play ball control as much as possible to try and keep the UT offense off the field. But If you are right and UT hits a couple of big plays then we could be in deep trouble. If all goes well for us it will come down to the 4th and we will have a shot at winning.
 
#39
#39
Fadeproof said:
I just dont see UT scoring 24 points. Not that they are not able or that our D is dominating. Just to the use of the new clock rules and I think CMR will play ball control as much as possible to try and keep the UT offense off the field. But If you are right and UT hits a couple of big plays then we could be in deep trouble. If all goes well for us it will come down to the 4th and we will have a shot at winning.
Click to expand...
oh, it's still and if at this point if we can or not...we're capable of it...and that may be enough to keep UGA's D on it's toes.:crossfingers:
 
#40
#40
Think Fadeproof will have to eat his words. Think we will get real close to that number of 24.
 
#41
#41
hohenfelsvol said:
Think Fadeproof will have to eat his words. Think we will get real close to that number of 24.
Click to expand...

You're right I probably will (even i predicted 26-24 UGA). IF so it wouldnt ve the first time I was wrong. I was once wrong back in 1988.:)
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top