Budalicious
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2021
- Messages
- 267
- Likes
- 302
Smart - finemy ideal coach is Josh Heupel with better coaching staff and better decision making, vision casting and killer instinct.
but if we are really going to play the game of "unlimited resources and suspend reality the I would put these coaches on the list:
Kirby Smart - wild success at a football program that is beneath the university of tennessee
Ryan Day - inherited a good program but has made his own name in not dropping off even one little bit.
Nick Saban (yes that's right Nick Saban)
Curt Cignetti (yes old but that guy did more good with less talent than Tennessee on its worst day ever) if he can win like that at Indiana he could win multiple titles with the resources Tennessee has.
I also think Lane Kiffin is just now entering his peak years of his career
we can't have any of those coaches but you specifically said "who is your model coach" and "unlimited resources" so I am suspending reality here.
If Huepel played Indiana's schedule he would be 11-1 or 12-0 every seasonthe recruiting restrictions are a headwind but never an excuse. if Curt Cignetti can win 11 games at Indiana when Indiana has never sniffed a recruiting class as good as Tennessee during these years of probation (or ever) then this argument that in year 5 these restrictions are an excuse is just a bad look. if you can coach, you can coach.
Just curious for those saying we are mediocre, or that we have hit our ceiling, or whatever, and I mean this in all seriousness...who is your model coach? If you had all the resources in the world right now who would you go get right now and replace Heupel with?
Smart - fine
Day finally won a big game and NC last year so sure
Saban - yea obviously
Cignetti - no way, he's won ONE decent game against an Oregon team that we aren't even sure how good they are yet... he purposefully has made his easy schedule even EASIER for five straight years...he's a fraud
Kiffin is Heupel with less success
Either...Indiana went last year during their "dream" season and didn't even play a ranked or winning team until the 3rd week of November and lostwith Tennessee's team or with Cignetti's team? with Tennessee's recruiting or with Indiana's recruiting?
Just like he did before here?Yet I would trust Kiffin with Tennessee’s resources to field a better roster and actually having a quality staff.
Heupel is loyal to a fault to his staff and I’ll never understand it. He’s the head coach at Tennessee. This promoting from within after Golesh left was absurd. Tennessee isn’t hamstringing Heupel’s staff spending either.
Are we not short on scholarships? Didn't we take a major hit when he took over? Those have been a hinderance and not a help to the football program since he took the job.
Just like he did before here?
7-6 with terrible decision making and roster usage, losing to mediocre teams and then leaving in the middle of the night to fail at three other places?
lane kiffin is NOT the same coach he was 16 years ago at UT, not even close. he's way better now. if you can have a 6-1 record at Ole Piss then you're a damn good coachJust like he did before here?
7-6 with terrible decision making and roster usage, losing to mediocre teams and then leaving in the middle of the night to fail at three other places?
You are hitting the nail on the head today. I think people underestimate the importance of the staff. No single human being can be an expert at everything. A head coach or any leader for that matter has to be able to delegate responsibilities when he needs to. The staff that carry those responsibilities can't be incompetent. Otherwise, the entire organization/football team suffers.Yet I would trust Kiffin with Tennessee’s resources to field a better roster and actually having a quality staff.
Heupel is loyal to a fault to his staff and I’ll never understand it. He’s the head coach at Tennessee. This promoting from within after Golesh left was absurd. Tennessee isn’t hamstringing Heupel’s staff spending either.
Ryan Day won a title after he made big name hires at the coordinator position.
Saban elevated a title program to a dynasty by evolving his offensive philosophy.
with money and recognition Tennessee should be able to attract a better level of coaching than just Heupel's cronies. we should be able to get ex-head coches or NFL coaches to come run our offense and defense. we are a big enough school to do this.You are hitting the nail on the head today. I think people underestimate the importance of the staff. No single human being can be an expert at everything. A head coach or any leader for that matter has to be able to delegate responsibilities when he needs to. The staff that carry those responsibilities can't be incompetent. Otherwise, the entire organization/football team suffers.
It's just leadership 101. You have to hire great people around you to succeed. Heupel will have to make some uncomfortable decisions moving forward because this could (long-term) jeopardize his tenure at Tennessee.
100% Tennessee is a much higher profile program now. We could bring in exceptional coordinator/coaching talent if we wanted to. One of the things that made Saban great was his ability to hire exceptional coordinators so I don't know why we couldn't do the same thing.with money and recognition Tennessee should be able to attract a better level of coaching than just Heupel's cronies. we should be able to get ex-head coches or NFL coaches to come run our offense and defense. we are a big enough school to do this.
sometimes I feel like Heupel is worried about being outclassed by his coordinators. he has to be the best guy in the room rather than relying on experts in their area of practice.100% Tennessee is a much higher profile program now. We could bring in exceptional coordinator/coaching talent if we wanted to. One of the things that made Saban great was his ability to hire exceptional coordinators so I don't know why we couldn't do the same thing.
Well said!People were willing to give Heupel 5 years and that was fair.
What people didn’t expect was an expedited process where Heupel elevated the program on a nuclear pace with the 2022 season.
It’s been 3 years since the 2022 season and all we have to show for it is an expanded playoff appearance and a 2-6 record vs Georgia, Bama, and Florida.
All these people crying “look where we were 5 years ago” aren’t educated. Heupel deserves all the credit for how quickly this program got turned around and elevated. He also deserves criticism for the current feeling of plateauing.
I know you have some kind of weird man crush on that loser, but Kiffin is a decent coach at best..not eliteAh yes. Using a single season from (checks notes) 16 years ago to grade a coach currently is totally logical.
People really are incapable of using their brains objectively.
I’m sure the coach who’s winning at a 72% clip at a historical 50% winning program would not do the same at a bigger school with bigger spending and resources in the exact same environment / league / schedule that he’s already coaching in.
That would just be looney tunes.
You're just telling the rest of the world "I don't fully understand how college football works," so why would we listen to you further? The things you're saying are ridiculous. Understand a topic before speaking on it with so much passion. Do you think recruiting is coaches just going "I want this guy" and then giving them a pitch? It's a years long process and not being able to do as much communicating, having less scholarships, and visits as other teams puts you at a massive disadvantage. They literally have had SEVEN MONTHS less time where they're allowed to call or text recruits during probation. Do you understand how that might affect relationship? Jeez man yall are the worstit'san opinion that those things have a meaningful impact on the on field results with NIL and the portal. heupel has already achieved good recruiting results and I refute the notion that having 2 more scholarships and a couple more visits per year would have significantly altered the trajectory of this program. to think otherwise is to be willfully ignorant. are those things headwinds? sure. are they an excuse for our results, absolutely not. we won 10 games in heupel's 2nd season. that's all the proof you need to see that it's not a real issue just an annoyance.
His first 2 years whatever but year 5 no this is his players and his development, anyone saying otherwise isn't being realistic.one of the favorite volnation excuses when evaluating the current coach is the ole "look what he inherited" and while it's true that heupel inherited a mess just like every coach in the country to comes into a situation where the previous coach was fired, but it is now the middle of year 5.
none of the players heupel inherited are still playing for this team.
he's had multiple recruiting cycles to bring in top rated players
he won 10 games in his second season so clearly it's not a real excuse for lack of success.
scholarship limits were increased by 20 so any limitations placed on UT due to sanctions (which were actually incredibly small limitations to begin with) are basically a non issue anymore.
so should this excuse be tolerated on this message board again? should people who use this excuse be reported and banned from this place?
I know you have some kind of weird man crush on that loser, but Kiffin is a decent coach at best..not elite
His record at Ole Miss is fine, it's not Johnny Vaught level but yes much better than say Matt Luke...but he has issues with big games
He would not be a threat at Florida just like he wasn't a threat at Tennessee or USC or Ole Miss (see a pattern here?)
So just like Cutcliffe, Billy Brewer, Hugh Freeze, etc?lane kiffin is NOT the same coach he was 16 years ago at UT, not even close. he's way better now. if you can have a 6-1 record at Ole Piss then you're a damn good coach