Iran

Clearly wiping out the ability of millions of civilians to live is comparable to speeding.

The question was whether he was planning to break any which I replied correctly.
Name one combatant anywhere in history that has refused to target infrastructure.
I’ll hang up and listen to your response. I can wait……

Even the Ukrainian’s whom the democrats adore keep blowing up the Russian Bridge to the Crimea. The absolute fiends 🙄
 
Ha, the war is over

Oil below $90 and falling as I type

The straight is open, wide open

No more chances of a dirty bomb with uranium enriched past 60%

Dow up 1500 today

and it cost less than the pallets of cash Obama sent to appease the last regime

yet Woodsie still cries like a wounded biotch.

exactly what I voted for. Really

daddy like, lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM
Name one combatant anywhere in history that has refused to target infrastructure.
I’ll hang up and listen to your response. I can wait……

Even the Ukrainian’s whom the democrats adore keep blowing up the Russian Bridge to the Crimea. The absolute fiends 🙄
You're trying to argue something I never claimed. Have fun doing it alone
 
Why should Lebanon be a part of the ceasefire? I understand they are Iran's only viable puppet and the want them protected, but Lebanon didn't agree to swat. Israel is supposed to just let Lebanon lob rockets into their country and not do anything. That deal was with Iran only. Israel would be stupid to agree to not strike a country that is attacking them.
I made no comment on if they should be included or not. I was providing information that shows this cease fire is dead in the water and unserious people claiming this was one of the greatest military achievements in US history probably ought to pause. The last part I added. Also


 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
They're like the Uvalde police. Too afraid to rush into the fray when the battle is raging. Tries to make arrests once the war is over.

I agree that in a total war situation, calling out war crimes is a pointless exercise. However we aren't in total war with Iran, they pose no threat to the USA at home, and one of our goals was supposedly to help the Iranian people. Not sure how "destroying their entire civilization" and all of their means to produce electricity to live off of was going to accomplish that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
I made no comment on if they should be included or not. I was providing information that shows this cease fire is dead in the water and unserious people claiming this was one of the greatest military achievements in US history probably ought to pause. The last part I added. Also


Israel backed the U.S. ceasefire with Iran, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the deal does not cover fighting against Hezbollah. Trump told the “PBS News Hour” that Lebanon was not included in the ceasefire deal “because of Hezbollah.”

Iran might say that Lebanon was included in the deal but Israel and the USA disagree. There's no agreement unless all parties agree
 
You aren't fooling (or scaring) anybody with your fake tough guy act.

"I haven't challenged anyone to a fight" - no, you just dance around it by saying you hope someone says that to your face. What's the implication there, Rambo? Seems pretty clear to me and anyone else with more than two brain cells to rub together.
Anybody’s face. I enjoy and like to watch the outcomes, like the “uncle Dan” video where he takes out about 5 of your type for yelling at and putting bullhorns in his face. Very enjoyable video.
No implication needed as its stated clearly I like to see people asking for trouble, antagonizing etc to find it. Hope you find it as well but my guess is you stick with being a brave ole message board bully.
 
Anybody’s face. I enjoy and like to watch the outcomes, like the “uncle Dan” video where he takes out about 5 of your type for yelling at and putting bullhorns in his face. Very enjoyable video.
No implication needed as its stated clearly I like to see people asking for trouble, antagonizing etc to find it. Hope you find it as well but my guess is you stick with being a brave ole message board bully.

I understand you feel like you're being bullied, I hope you talk to your psychiatrist about it. Work through that victim complex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ttucke11
Except it's specifically outlawed. But sure
Which was the last country to be convicted of war crimes for blowing up bridges and energy infrastructure? In this conflict if anyone is committing war crimes it is Iran. They are purposely targeting civilians, their own and other countries. Hamas and Hezbollah did the same.
More politicians are convicted of insider trading than countries are convicted of war crimes.
 
I agree that in a total war situation, calling out war crimes is a pointless exercise. However we aren't in total war with Iran, they pose no threat to the USA at home, and one of our goals was supposedly to help the Iranian people. Not sure how "destroying their entire civilization" and all of their means to produce electricity to live off of was going to accomplish that.
No offense intended here, but I thought that was covered in my post a few before the one you replied to. We don't wage war. We wage "war".

I have long felt if there is a sufficient enough reason to go to war, then it deserves to be a 'no holds barred' effort so we can get to the end as soon as possible. Nothing since ww2 has come close to that level of sufficiency.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top