Iran

[KB5252]

Critiquing Israel and its influence on our country isn't "going off the rails". Anyone with even the slightest bit of awareness knows it. They're mostly just scared to say it because of the societal programming.

You have a history of being off rail. You deal almost exclusively in the arena most would consider conspiracy theory.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Revelation 3:9 I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but are lying—I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you.

You get that he’s talking about Christianity and the replacement theology? Right?

 

[sonofUT62]

I don't really read it that way

Implying that Iranians are somehow better than Jews or Americans because “they’re not in the files” is a wild take. It puts forth the implication that no one in the Middle East has been involved in pdf files behavior. I honestly don’t know what the norms are in Iran as far as age limits etc. But they definitely share borders with people who don’t belong like we do.

 

[Smokey123]

Reliant on others for basic internet functions. Proven.

The internet says you’re wrong. So if you could provide them like you said you would that’d be great

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

What are some of the Christians in this thread going to do when they discover Jesus is a Jew?

The people we call "Jews" today are not the people of Jesus. Its why I refrain from calling them Jews. Its an intentional misidentification on their part. They are mostly Khazaian converts from Eastern Europe that practice "Rabbinical Judaism" something Jesus and the true tribe of Judah wouldn't understand. Also most so-called "Jews" aren't even religious. They are either atheists or in the case of Epstein and his ilk Satanists.

Would Jesus recognize this Israel?

 

[adam.vol]

You get that he’s talking about Christianity and the replacement theology? Right?

I get that he fancies himself as a Zionist.

 

[lawgator1]

The 153 kids is in dispute. The only claim I've seen it was the US was Iranian state media claims which were parroted by other new outlets. This accusation was rejected by the US.

I did some digging for clarity and I found this interesting. If it was a US missile it was an unlucky bounce that deviated outside the expected target area, most likely a military base nearby.

Our missiles have an accuracy rate of around 95 to 98% on target.

Iranian missiles were observed during the last round of vollies to have an astoundingly high volume of failure, just under 50% either failed at launch or crashed before reaching the target.

I'm not completely sure how they came to that very last conclusion. But it would seem to me if we were to attempt to determine the source of the girls school bombing, logic would tell us it was much more likely it was a failed Iranian launch than a US missile off target.

What really happened through I'm not sure, not sure anyone can say with certainty.

You are probably right. Any report will be rejected by the party implicated.

 

[KB5252]

Rumor has it slice is actually a Rothschild

I don't want to be one but I wouldn't mind an allowance.

 

[Smokey123]

You have a history of being off rail. You deal almost exclusively in the arena most would consider conspiracy theory.

Anyone that takes Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens seriously should have their head examined. So easily manipulated

 

[MAD]

I don't want to be one but I wouldn't mind an allowance.

Wouldn’t we all, hearing there is pretty good money in Learing Centers though.

 

[adam.vol]

The internet says you’re wrong. So if you could provide them like you said you would that’d be great

You’re lying to get me to do your work.

 

[KB5252]

I want you to stop for a second and realize that you’re walking very close to identifying Middle Eastern Muslims as the virtuous defenders of teenage girls.

Not so fast, apparently Sauds and other royals in the Gulf have also been implicated.

 

[ButchPlz]

You get that he’s talking about Christianity and the replacement theology? Right?

Holy cow, a dude from a 1960s hippie religion making things up, who would have thought?

Let's check the stats:

Adam Clarke: The blasphemy of them which say they are Jews - There were persons there who professed Judaism, and had a synagogue in the place, and professed to worship the true God; but they had no genuine religion, and they served the devil rather than God. They applied a sacred name to an unholy thing: and this is one meaning of the word blasphemy in this book.

Albert Barnes:
Of them which say they are Jews - Who profess to be Jews. The idea seems to be that though they were of Jewish extraction, and professed to be Jews, they were not true Jews; they indulged in a bitterness of reproach, and a severity of language, which showed that they had not the spirit of the Jewish religion; they had nothing which became those who were under the guidance of the spirit of their own Scriptures. That would have inculcated and fostered a milder temper; and the meaning here is, that although they were of Jewish origin, they were not worthy of the name. That spirit of bitter opposition was indeed often manifested in their treatment of Christians, as it had been of the Saviour, but still it was foreign to the true nature of their religion. There were Jews in all parts of Asia Minor, and the apostles often encountered them in their journeyings, but it would seem that there was something which had particularly embittered those of Smyrna against Christianity. What this was is now unknown.

It may throw some light on the passage, however, to remark that at a somewhat later period - in the time of the martyrdom of Polycarp - the Jews of Smyrna were among the most bitter of the enemies of Christians, and among the most violent in demanding the death of Polycarp. Eusebius (Eccl. Hist. 4:15) says,. that when Polycarp was apprehended, and brought before the proconsul at Smyrna, the Jews were the most furious of all in demanding his condemnation. When the mob, after his condemnation to death, set about gathering fuel to burn him, “the Jews,” says he, “being especially zealous, as was their custom - μάλιστα προθύμως, ὡς ἔθος αὐτοῖς malista prothumōs, hōs ethos autois - ran to procure fuel.” And when, as the burning failed, the martyr was transfixed with weapons, the Jews urged and besought the magistrate that his body might not be given up to Christians. Possibly at the time when this epistle was directed to be sent to Smyrna, there were Jews there who manifested the same spirit which those of their countrymen did afterward, who urged on the death of Polycarp.

But are the synagogue of Satan - Deserve rather to be called the synagogue of Satan. The synagogue was a Jewish place of worship (compare the notes on Mat 4:23), but the word originally denoted “the assembly” or “the congregation.” The meaning here is plain, that though they worshipped in a synagogue, and professed to be the worshippers of God, yet they were not worthy of the name, and deserved rather to be regarded as in the service of Satan. “Satan” is the word that is properly applied to the great evil spirit, elsewhere called the devil. See the Luk 22:3 note, and Job 1:6 note.

Matthew Henry: 3. He knows the wickedness and the falsehood of their enemies: I know the blasphemy of those that say they are Jews, but are not; that is, of those who pretend to be the only peculiar covenant-people of God, as the Jews boasted themselves to be, even after God had rejected them; or of those who would be setting up the Jewish rites and ceremonies, which were now not only antiquated, but abrogated; these may say that they only are the church of God in the world, when indeed they are the synagogue of Satan.

 

[Smokey123]

You’re lying to get me to do your work.

Just say you’re full of **** and move on

 

[KB5252]

Wouldn’t we all, hearing there is pretty good money in Learing Centers though.

I need to fix my face and learn Somali I guess.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Man, this is just like MAD's taqiyya stuff about how Muslim politicians like Zohran are lying to facilitate sharia law takeover or whatever

Well he's engaging in trying to read minds. I stating facts that can be verified. Mossad agents being caught trying to do false flag attacks has been widely documented. Its not something that requires you taking a leap of faith. All you need to do is look up the evidence.

 

[McDad]

Critiquing Israel and its influence on our country isn't "going off the rails". Anyone with even the slightest bit of awareness knows it. They're mostly just scared to say it because of the societal programming.

Critique is not off the rails.

The conspiracy of world control or american control is off the rails.

 

[McDad]

The people we call "Jews" today are not the people of Jesus. Its why I refrain from calling them Jews. Its an intentional misidentification on their part. They are mostly Khazaian converts from Eastern Europe that practice "Rabbinical Judaism" something Jesus and the true tribe of Judah wouldn't understand. Also most so-called "Jews" aren't even religious. They are either atheists or in the case of Epstein and his ilk Satanists.

Would Jesus recognize this Israel?

 

[McDad]

You get that he’s talking about Christianity and the replacement theology? Right?

There is a religion thread in the pub, slice. Don't make me get the mod in here.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Since you're such a fan:

AI search: Is Tucker Carlson a reliable reporter


Arguments Against Reliability

• Legal Defense: In a 2020 defamation lawsuit, Fox News lawyers successfully argued that "no reasonable person" would believe Carlson was "stating actual facts" on his show, describing it instead as "non-literal commentary".
• Fact-Checking: Organizations like PolitiFact have flagged numerous statements by Carlson as "False" or "Pants on Fire," particularly regarding COVID-19, the January 6 Capitol attack, and election integrity.
• Media Analysis: Ad Fontes Media classifies his work as "Hyper-Partisan Right" and "Unreliable/Problematic".
• Controversial Coverage: He has been criticized for promoting conspiracy theories, such as the "Great Replacement" theory and claims about Ukrainian bioweapons.

Looks like a bunch of left wing reality checking bull. I thought we were mostly conservatives here? Covid-19 being a hoax is a pretty mainstream conservative view.

 

[Orangeslice13]

I get that he fancies himself as a Zionist.

scripture writers fancy themselves as a Zionist?

Well who would have thought that was the case

 

[adam.vol]

Just say you’re full of **** and move on

Sorry, I don’t lie. I’m looking at a substantial list right now. I’m tired of you lazy pieces of **** trolls asking someone else to research for you.

That’s your game, right? You give a flippant response, insult me, and then to challenge me to do a bunch of work. Well, it seems we have a standoff.

 

[McDad]

Holy cow, a dude from a 1960s hippie religion making things up, who would have thought?

Let's check the stats:

Adam Clarke: The blasphemy of them which say they are Jews - There were persons there who professed Judaism, and had a synagogue in the place, and professed to worship the true God; but they had no genuine religion, and they served the devil rather than God. They applied a sacred name to an unholy thing: and this is one meaning of the word blasphemy in this book.

Albert Barnes:
Of them which say they are Jews - Who profess to be Jews. The idea seems to be that though they were of Jewish extraction, and professed to be Jews, they were not true Jews; they indulged in a bitterness of reproach, and a severity of language, which showed that they had not the spirit of the Jewish religion; they had nothing which became those who were under the guidance of the spirit of their own Scriptures. That would have inculcated and fostered a milder temper; and the meaning here is, that although they were of Jewish origin, they were not worthy of the name. That spirit of bitter opposition was indeed often manifested in their treatment of Christians, as it had been of the Saviour, but still it was foreign to the true nature of their religion. There were Jews in all parts of Asia Minor, and the apostles often encountered them in their journeyings, but it would seem that there was something which had particularly embittered those of Smyrna against Christianity. What this was is now unknown.

It may throw some light on the passage, however, to remark that at a somewhat later period - in the time of the martyrdom of Polycarp - the Jews of Smyrna were among the most bitter of the enemies of Christians, and among the most violent in demanding the death of Polycarp. Eusebius (Eccl. Hist. 4:15) says,. that when Polycarp was apprehended, and brought before the proconsul at Smyrna, the Jews were the most furious of all in demanding his condemnation. When the mob, after his condemnation to death, set about gathering fuel to burn him, “the Jews,” says he, “being especially zealous, as was their custom - μάλιστα προθύμως, ὡς ἔθος αὐτοῖς malista prothumōs, hōs ethos autois - ran to procure fuel.” And when, as the burning failed, the martyr was transfixed with weapons, the Jews urged and besought the magistrate that his body might not be given up to Christians. Possibly at the time when this epistle was directed to be sent to Smyrna, there were Jews there who manifested the same spirit which those of their countrymen did afterward, who urged on the death of Polycarp.

But are the synagogue of Satan - Deserve rather to be called the synagogue of Satan. The synagogue was a Jewish place of worship (compare the notes on Mat 4:23), but the word originally denoted “the assembly” or “the congregation.” The meaning here is plain, that though they worshipped in a synagogue, and professed to be the worshippers of God, yet they were not worthy of the name, and deserved rather to be regarded as in the service of Satan. “Satan” is the word that is properly applied to the great evil spirit, elsewhere called the devil. See the Luk 22:3 note, and Job 1:6 note.

Matthew Henry: 3. He knows the wickedness and the falsehood of their enemies: I know the blasphemy of those that say they are Jews, but are not; that is, of those who pretend to be the only peculiar covenant-people of God, as the Jews boasted themselves to be, even after God had rejected them; or of those who would be setting up the Jewish rites and ceremonies, which were now not only antiquated, but abrogated; these may say that they only are the church of God in the world, when indeed they are the synagogue of Satan.

Religion thread in Pub. TIA.

 

[Smokey123]

Sorry, I don’t lie. I’m looking at a substantial list right now. I’m tired of you lazy pieces of **** trolls asking someone else to research for you.

So send the list. Not very hard

 

[Orangeslice13]

There is a religion thread in the pub, slice. Don't make me get the mod in here.

I was kicked out of that thread for telling @LouderVol he wasn’t going to hell because there’s no hell according to scripture.
So here we are