LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 60,343
- Likes
- 62,031
lol, you think you have access to the same AI tools the Pentagon does?What's your proof? I'm just supposed to take your word for it instead of the AI (which if you've paid attention to the news is currently being used right now by the Pentagon in this war).
If the government is using AI to determine how it conducts this war with Iran then I'm sure the AI is good enough to answer questions about the capabilities and purpose of our military crafts.
unless you are paying stupid amounts of money which ever AI slop you are using is like poling Redit for answers. yeah you may get some basics, but you aren't going to get the real context a real expert would actually provide.
the point you are missing with the Ford defense systems is they ONLY protect the Ford. they do not protect even the other ships around the Ford, yet alone an entire country or even a city. It doesn't matter how advanced the Ford's systems are, they aren't protecting Israel. There ARE ships in our navy with that capability, but your trust in AI slop is incapable of processing that. Where semantics would actually come into play is what is the "best" system out there. the Ford probably does have the best carrier defense system, as in protecting itself system. But for intercepting ballistic missiles hundreds of miles away the best system is probably on a cruiser or destroyer.
Kinda like bringing in a different kicker for an extra long FG. yeah the one guy is the best from 45 in, but 50 out, there is a better kicker. in this situation the Ford has the best extra point kicker, and you are trying to equate that to long range field goals.
don't trust the AI, it doesn't make you any more informed than you were before.

