Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 44,305
- Likes
- 91,267
Serious question: Can you point to where the Trump administration has created policies to pay terrorist regimes? I'm trying to follow your argument and admit that I probably haven't followed that aspect terribly closely.
That article is from before he was president and lists it as a multi-national agreement as part of the Biden administration's policy...? Are you saying that Trump signed the agreement after he was sworn in as President? If so, is that predictive of Trump's future policy objectives, or him eating the **** sandwich he'd been left?Sure, he sign the deal in Afghanistan, now we are paying the Taliban via that agreement.
As far as him directly this term, he even has a terrorist in the white house.
US scraps $10m bounty for arrest of Syria's new leader Sharaa

It is a further sign of the dramatic shifts under way in Syria since the ousting of Assad, and the speed of efforts by the US and Europe, also leaning on Arab countries, to try to influence its emerging governance.
The visit follows those of delegations in recent days from the UN and other countries including the UK, France and Germany.
The delegation of senior officials includes Barbara Leaf, Roger Carstens, who is US President Joe Biden's hostage envoy, and Daniel Rubinstein, a senior adviser in the Bureau of Near East Affairs.
That article is from before he was president and lists it as a multi-national agreement as part of the Biden administration's policy...? Are you saying that Trump signed the agreement after he was sworn in as President? If so, is that predictive of Trump's future policy objectives, or him eating the **** sandwich he'd been left?
View attachment 806271
Yes, what was what?Yes, it was and he invited him to the white house, if Al Qaeda he can put him back on the list. He was militarily supporting Al Qaeda (and ISIS) to overthrow the Syrian government. Nor did he criminal prosecute those that were aiding the enemy of the U.S. in his first term.
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2770
Al Qaeda says they are really sorry about the buildings and dead americans, kind of, maybe... not really. But get your ass back to work so you can send them more aid.
When George Bush said we're going make Al Qaeda pay, he wasn't joking.
Yes, what was what?
That link indicates that they were allowing aid over a 6 month period, to try to help the Syrian people, as trying to make the best in the short term of a **** sandwich that was left them. I'm not sure that's the best predictive point of Trump's future policy.
It almost seems like you're trying to twist things into the worst narrative possible. Knowing you and your posting history, I'm sure that's not the case.
...arming, militarily support and funding known terrorist...
Your links didn't state that.
I agree there is little you seem to be able to do for me, but don't blame me when you're having trouble proving your claims.
I guess, once you have proven your claims, we could then tackle your predictive value of whether trying to force down someone else's **** sandwich is indicative of what one would prepare from scratch.
And you sound exactly like a Russian bot that was turned up to 11 after Putin lost some global leverage in Venezuela and Iran. You're just oozing panic for some reason.You can continue to believe what you want to believe which is why you claimed that launching nuclear weapons at everyone isn't an act of war.
You are a nut. There isn't anything I can do for you.![]()
And you sound exactly like a Russian bot that was turned up to 11 after Putin lost some global leverage in Venezuela and Iran. You're just oozing panic for some reason.
The one factual thing that you've posted is that there is nothing you can do for me, and that's just because you've been the proof.
Anyone who read that thread can see how disingenuous you're being. Stuff like this doesn't help your credibility. That's just a free PSA, for your benefit....
Oh, and when the Japaneses bombed pearl harbor it wasn't an act of war, it was a misunderstanding.
...
