volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 70,100
- Likes
- 63,489
My Chinese grandparents.
the responsible japs that did the atrocities at Nanking were executed for war crimes.... my human nature common sense is that we don't hear about this because the USA was more Euro-centric and did not receive the same attention as the Holocaust horror show.Yep. Google "the rape of Nanking" as an example. There is an alternate spelling too but this one works. The atrocities of the Japanese in WW2 get zero attention compared to the Germans. Taught nothing about it in school. They absolutely slaughtered the Chinese...the overwhelming majority of which were completely unarmed or had shovels and pitchforks at best. Those unarmed civilians and farmers were slaughtered and tens of thousands of their women were raped until their deaths. Children were not spared either. Then theres the horrible torture "experiments" that they did on captured people...(google "Unit 731" ) like seeing how many organs and which could be removed from living people without anesthetic before they died. Or how and which acids and chemical/biological weapons killed the quickest...again, these horrors were performed on conscious and living people strapped to gurneys. The Japanese did horrible, evil things to mostly civilians in WW2 but that all got somehow swept under the rug because eventually we dropped nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Somehow this made them only victims in history books...at least the ones I read in school.
The Japanese unleashed an unrelenting brutality on the Chinese.There is so much unbridled brutality in war. It's insincere to take an event or two and ascribe those as the worst atrocities.
The Japanese were far more brutal and inhumane to the Chinese than the Germans were to the Jews but we rarely ever hear of that.
Even if this were true (it isn’t), I think Japan, the country that did the attack, is still the one who should be blamed.
Three days before the Dec. 7, 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt was warned in a memo from naval intelligence that Tokyo's military and spy network was focused on Hawaii, a new and eerie reminder of FDR's failure to act on a basket load of tips that war was near.
Potential wedding band.
And I thought the other day you had reached the pinnacle of idiocy.
Three days before the Dec. 7, 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt was warned in a memo from naval intelligence that Tokyo's military and spy network was focused on Hawaii, a new and eerie reminder of FDR's failure to act on a basket load of tips that war was near.
The firebombing by the US killed more than the atomic bombs. You’re clueless
The US knew a land invasion would be needed to get the Japanese to surrender and this would kill thousands more than ONE atomic bomb…. But they chose not to surrender so a second was dropped. This still killed less than a ground assault would have.Because we dropped more conventional bombs than nukes. Did 2 conventional bombs like more than the 2 nukes?
The reason nukes are so dangerous is because of the amount of damage they can each cause not because they killed more people in totality than all the other bombs used in war combined.
That girl in the white bikini actually her? Looks like a different body type.View attachment 750869
Yeah...shes got a nice booty for sure. Attractive woman IMO though not my personal type. Shes quite intelligent though and impressive to be sure. She married some flabby dude as old as her dad though so questionable judgment perhaps? Daddy issues? Or maybe her love is truly blind. Regardless, she owns liberal reporters on a daily basis and its hilarious. The MSM is a sad joke...and a cancer to this country and the world. I quit watching their BS years ago and our lives are better for it.
There's more to a bomb than uranium. Just chucking it at something doesn't make it go boom.No. No they aren't. They can't. Show me a bunker buster that penetrates a mile deep.
Iran apparently STILL has its enriched Uranium. Now they'll ramp it up to 90%.
Why wouldn't they?
Then they'll have a nuclear bomb.
NZ's very anti-nuclear so it's a moot point, but them being nuclear armed probably wouldn't be a major concern for PRC. With their population they wouldn't support more than a submarine's payload of warheads.China would. That'd severely upset the Pacific geo-political theater. Hell, they're pissed about our partnership with Australia.