Iran

#4,427
#4,427
kiddiedoc said:
This is literally the way to prevent an actual war. They disregarded nuclear sanctions, we fixed it. Now they can decide: negotiate peace or get leveled. No pussy-footing around and going ground to get nowhere.
Click to expand...

What does this even mean? I figure you're trying to say they broke an agreement, but that's not what happened and it's not what you're saying.

We had a deal with Iran that Iran kept until Trump broke it. They went against the agreement after we welched.
 
#4,430
#4,430
lawgator1 said:
I thought he'd TACO out of it but he hedged his bets. I'm still conflicted about the wisdom of it, but hoping for the best and that it causes things to go in a good direction.
Click to expand...
Yeah..we were wrong.

Someone has more confidence in the B-2 than I realized. Good for us
 
#4,432
#4,432
volfanhill said:
If you were Iran, why would you have left any of the enriched uranium at those sites?
Click to expand...
Only if I couldn't move it. I have no idea if they could have moved it or not given the surveillance they're under.
OrangeTsar said:
The main point I believe wasn’t to necessarily destroy their stockpile as much as it was to prevent them from adding to it
Click to expand...
I'm not saying it would be a complete failure, but I'd hardly call it a success if Iran retains enough to produce even 1 nuke. Short of a full regime change, the status quo stays the same if ("2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months, et....") if Iran still has enriched uranium.
 
#4,440
#4,440
MontyPython said:
Have you already forgotten the Afghanistan war? We lost to a bunch of goat ****ers dude. Doing exactly what you're advocating we do again.

We lost 6K men in Afghanistan and spent $2.3 trillion bucks. And for what? The Taliban remains in charge today.

What happened to Trump's "let's stay out of foreign wars"?
Click to expand...

Nothing I advocated for just now is what we did in Afghanistan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN and lukeneyland
#4,442
#4,442
volfanhill said:
Our intelligence community says they do and so does the congressional record


www.bbc.com

North Korea nuclear: US intelligence report says regime to keep weapons

A US intelligence report to the Senate goes against Trump administration hopes of progress.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
Click to expand...
This.

Yes, North Korea has nuclear weapons. The country has conducted multiple nuclear tests since 2006, with the most recent confirmed test in 2017. Estimates suggest North Korea possesses a small but functional nuclear arsenal, potentially ranging from 20 to 80 warheads, based on its production of fissile material. The regime has also developed ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear payloads, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) that could theoretically reach the United States. However, the exact size, sophistication, and reliability of their arsenal remain uncertain due to limited transparency and intelligence challenges.
 
#4,444
#4,444
MontyPython said:
Neither did Bin Laden.

20 years, 6,000 dead Americans and $2.3 trillion later....
Click to expand...
And staying there for 20 years was a mistake. Once we nailed Bin Laden, we should’ve told Karzai have told Afghanistan we’re out in a year. Get your 💩 in a pile and have your plan ready to execute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#4,445
#4,445


Grok

@grok
·
20m

The video likely depicts the US attack on Iran's Isfahan nuclear reactor on June 21, 2025, as confirmed by President Trump's statement and Iranian officials. News reports, including The New York Times and Al Jazeera, verify strikes on Isfahan, with the IAEA noting damage to a centrifuge workshop. The video's explosion aligns with expected footage, but without geolocation or timestamp, its authenticity isn't fully verifiable. It seems plausible, yet caution is advised with unverified footage.
 
#4,447
#4,447
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top