Iran

How many missiles did Iran fire at Israel?


AI Overview


As of March 20, 2026, during the ongoing conflict, Iran has fired
approximately 340 ballistic missiles at Israel, with the intensity of attacks decreasing from a high of roughly 100 on the first days to smaller, intermittent salvos. These strikes have targeted various areas, causing damage, although Israeli defense systems have intercepted a high percentage.
American Jewish Committee +4
  • Initial Barrage: Over the first two days of the conflict, about 100 missiles were launched.
  • Total Count: By March 20, 2026, officials estimated around 340 total missiles had been fired, far fewer than the 550 launched in the June 2025 "Twelve-Day War".
  • Attack Intensity:Attacks decreased from initial waves to roughly 20 per day, with some days seeing only four or five, indicating reduced operational capacity
    .
    • Damage: Over 60% of Iran's surface-to-surface missile capability has been damaged or destroyed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).
      The Jerusalem Post +1
This data pertains to the conflict occurring in March 2026.

As of late March 2026, U.S. and Israeli forces have engaged in a major, ongoing campaign against Iran, with U.S. Central Command reporting over 7,000 targets struck in Iran since February 28, 2026. The campaign, which has involved widespread strikes against military infrastructure, has seen over 1,400 fatalities reported in Iran.
Al Jazeera +3
Key Details of the Conflict (As of March 20-21, 2026):
  • Total Targets: Over 7,000+ targets hit, according to U.S. officials.
  • Major Strikes: Operations have targeted Iranian military, nuclear, and energy infrastructure, including the South Pars gas field.
  • Naval Conflict:At least 120 Iranian naval vessels and ships have been destroyed or damaged near the Strait of Hormuz
    .
    • Casualties: Over 1,400 people are reported killed in Iran.
    • Scope: Strikes are targeting sites across Iran, with heavy focus on military, naval, and nuclear infrastructure, as part of operations described as "deep" and "strategic".
      BBC +4
The campaign has resulted in severe damage to infrastructure, including oil and power facilities, with retaliatory strikes occurring from Iran into the Gulf States and Israel.
Al Jazeera
Al Jazeera +1
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
Why would force matter? They are not doing it and the oil needs to move, so we are. If we secure the strait, we should charge them.
This formulation elides the important fact that traffic flowed through the strait unobstructed until the governments of the United States and Israel began striking Iran without a plan for securing the strait (per the WSJ, the president disregarded Gen. Caine's warning that Iran would - as everyone in the administration should have known - close the strait in response to our attack).
 
This formulation elides the important fact that traffic flowed through the strait unobstructed until the governments of the United States and Israel began striking Iran without a plan for securing the strait (per the WSJ, the president disregarded Gen. Caine's warning that Iran would - as everyone in the administration should have known - close the strait in response to our attack).

That doesn’t change the reality that those countries need it open and are doing next to nothing to assist. So if it is to be secured with our money, they should be charged.

You disagree?
 
That doesn’t change the reality that those countries need it open and are doing next to nothing to assist. So if it is to be secured with our money, they should be charged.

You disagree?
The war of choice our government initiated in partnership with the government of Israel is the proximate cause of the strait's closure. Since we broke it, the cost of fixing it is ours to bear.

However that may be, though, I don't believe it's in our country's interest to occupy the strait and to militarily control access through it, which would be the necessary condition for taxing Chinese and European traffic through it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeardedVol
The war of choice our government initiated in partnership with the government of Israel is the proximate cause of the strait's closure. Since we broke it, the cost of fixing it is ours to bear.

You’re denying Iranians agency. They chose to shut the strait down. Surely you don’t blame us for Iran attacking a civilian airport in azerbaijan too? Their action are their own.

However that may be, though, I don't believe it's in our country's interest to occupy the strait and to militarily control access through it, which would be the necessary condition for taxing Chinese and European traffic through it.

If that’s what is needed to open it, I’m not opposed, but if so we should charge both heavily
 
You’re denying Iranians agency. They chose to shut the strait down. Surely you don’t blame us for Iran attacking a civilian airport in azerbaijan too? Their action are their own.



If that’s what is needed to open it, I’m not opposed, but if so we should charge both heavily

Cornering a rat and then getting upset at the rat for biting your children who happen to already be in the corner.
 
Cornering a rat and then getting upset at the rat for biting your children who happen to already be in the corner.

That’s an absolute absurd take. They have agency. If they decide to attack civilian airports in a country that’s not even remotely involved in this war, that’s solely on them.

Y’all’s desire in here to blame the US for all things is wild.
 
How pathetically brainwashed does someone have to be to blame the US for Iranians attacking a third party civilian airport with no US presence?

Some in here are beyond lost.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top