Iran

Meanwhile, Israel says we approved it. Wonder which liar is lying this time



It translates to "Trump is lying, plain and simple." according to GPT.

Let's go to @MAD

Hey bud, I got a question. Who do you believe? The war criminals in Israel or the war criminal in the WH?
 
Last edited:
Volnation’s political discussions in a nutshell.

Stand for nothing, against everything.

Gets very tiring, and they just keep going and going until they’ve gotten in the last word, or they gang up and bully.

Tell me this doesn’t follow the exact formula👇


Thanks for another riveting Tweet from one of Trump’s key insiders on Iran: Carmela Mendoza! She’s a part-time US resident and is a “Free Spirited Indigenous Hupa Indian American Patriot” who splits her time between Canada and Miami. She’s a Capricorn, loves disco dancing and burly men with lamb chop sideburns. When she’s not taking long walks on the beach in Florida or shoveling snow in Montreal, Carmela brings her amazing esthetician skills to multiple Belk stores in S. Florida much to the delight of many bored housewives there.

Also, she happily serves as a part-time exotic dancer / Cabinet member to President Trump.

Nice work @MAD. Keep them amazing Tweets coming!
 
Last edited:
Since the intel community of the US is very relevant to this thread, the USIC is attempting to bully Japan with regards to China/Taiwan, and Japan is very loudly and publicly rejecting the USIC's "reports". So much for all the respect the Trump admin has garnered us around the world!
 
Most of you fail to understand what we are dealing with here. Iran brutally executed the person, among others that President Trump demanded that the regime not execute. They hung this guy at the end of a crane and let him die by strangulation, while he was suspended in the air. In January, Trump said it was a redline for him.


There are plenty of examples of US government/military committed atrocities. Does that mean we should be invaded?
 

Iran attack wipes out 17% of Qatar’s LNG capacity for up to five years, QatarEnergy CEO says: Reuters​


All part of Trumps 4D master chess plan.

Oh, FFS.

Edit: NBD, just 3.4% of the world's supply. If it's a mildly inelastic good, we're probably looking at a 5-10% price increase. There is a good chance it's worse than that.

Just so everybody understands, LNG is used to create electricity at power plants. My power company primarily uses NG to power my county, but the price hike of LNG will affect me, all the same. If your home uses NG or your power plant does, have fun for the next 5 years. Hopefully, we don't see much more of this.

"He who can destroy a thing has power over it" - Dune
 
Last edited:
You say this like things didn't work out. Staying out of it until the fight came to us looks like a winning strategy in those 2 particular case studies.
Uh, the fight did not come to us in 1918, Woodrow Wilson wanted in and ginned up support. In WWI Germany was not a real threat to us, but Hitler stupidly declared war on us after Pearl Harbor. Iran is a far greater threat to the U.S. than Germany ever was. We had legitimate beef with the Japanese.
This is the same as the Afghanistan and Iraq. Afghanistan needed taken care of, they attacked us ala Japan in 1945. Iraq was not an imminent threat, they were a pain in the azz but with out nukes they were not a really a threat to the U.S. at the time.
The other difference with Iran is that it is a fanatical religious regime that does not give a single f. Their philosophy is agree with their insanity or get your head chopped off. The only way to "deal" with that mentality is to kill them first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAD
Uh, the fight did not come to us in 1918, Woodrow Wilson wanted in and ginned up support. In WWI Germany was not a real threat to us, but Hitler stupidly declared war on us after Pearl Harbor. Iran is a far greater threat to the U.S. than Germany ever was. We had legitimate beef with the Japanese.
This is the same as the Afghanistan and Iraq. Afghanistan needed taken care of, they attacked us ala Japan in 1945. Iraq was not an imminent threat, they were a pain in the azz but with out nukes they were not a really a threat to the U.S. at the time.
The other difference with Iran is that it is a fanatical religious regime that does not give a single f. Their philosophy is agree with their insanity or get your head chopped off. The only way to "deal" with that mentality is to kill them first.

The Lusitania is what I mean.

This is not the same as Afganistan. Are you kidding? We went into Afghanistan because the Taliban was harboring Osama. Wtf are you talking about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
Can't be killed by the IGRC, if Israel or the US kills you first.

giphy.gif
Buddy it would take the U.S. and Israel three years to kill as many Iranian civilians at the current rate to equal the number murdered by the Mullahs in 2 days in January.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top