McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 64,962
- Likes
- 143,246
He said it. If we attacked because of an imminent threat, and the "imminent threat" was the response to Israel's forthcoming attack, and Israel determines whether or not Israel attacks, then it makes it sound like we're in (whether we want to be or not) the moment Israel decides to attackSo not only are you a board monitor you are psychic as well with Rubio's thoughts.
What did the Israelis have to gain by assassinating JFK?
That article doesn't suggest that it "couldn't be passed up" at all, just that Netanyahu had been lobbying for it for months and when finally imminent they moved it up by a day.They and I don't agree with you ...
Although Israel and the US had planned to hit the country at night to take advantage of darkness, as was the method during the 12-day war’s Operation Midnight Hammer, the CIA’s information about the gathering moved up the timing of Saturday’s attacks, the Times reported.
Word for word what get (copy pasting your search)
The United States stationed the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) Carrier Strike Group in the Eastern Mediterranean primarily to deter regional adversaries—specifically Iran and Hezbollah—from entering the conflict between
Israel
and Hamas.
Reuters +2
The deployment served several critical strategic and operational purposes:
The USS Gerald R. Ford was originally deployed to the Mediterranean in May 2023 to deter Russian aggression following the invasion of Ukraine. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin redirected it to the coast of Israel on October 8, 2023, and subsequently extended its deployment multiple times as regional tensions remained high
- Deterrence of Escalation: The primary mission was to prevent the localized war in Gaza from expanding into a broader regional conflict. Its presence sent a "strong signal" to any actor hostile to Israel that might consider taking advantage of the instability.
- Show of Support for Israel: Moving the world's most advanced aircraft carrier was a visible demonstration of the U.S.'s "ironclad support" for Israel's defense following the October 7, 2023, attacks.
- Operational Readiness: The carrier provided multidimensional capabilities, including:
- Intelligence and Surveillance: Using advanced dual-band radar and aircraft to monitor threats at vast distances.
- Air Superiority: Housing eight squadrons of attack and support aircraft ready for rapid response if needed.
- Special Operations Support: Serving as a potential base for U.S. special operations forces, especially for potential hostage rescue missions.
- Strategic Buffer: The carrier's position acted as an "insurance policy," ensuring that any major retaliation against Israel would likely have to involve or bypass American naval assets, effectively raising the stakes for any aggressor.
U.S. Naval Institute +10
Are you by chance of Middle Eastern descent?
AIPAC wasn’t a thing yet it was the AZC. Eisenhower tried to do the same thing and intervened on egypts behalf during the Suez Crisis. JFK ended the weapons bargo on Israel, started security relations with Israel and outspokenly supported a Jewish state. Bobby was also shot for being a Zionist.He was against them getting nukes and wanted to designate AIPAC as a foreign agent.
The main point is JFK was the last true President of the United States. Everyone since then all US Presidents have been controlled by the satanic pedophile cabal Epstein worked for.
It's crazy how you can be so lucid with posts like the one above and then be off the rails in the next post.I'm black. Most people know that given the positions I've argued on lots of other topics in the past.
I think its funny how you presume that because I'm anti-Israel I must then be pro-Arab or Persian. Nope. A true American doesn't care about either one of these foreign entities. They could both dissappear tomorrow for all I care. I only have interest in the United States being prosperous. Not Israel or the Arab/Persian states.
The Iranians already have enriched uranium far above energy production grade hidden away. We hampered their ability enrich it further and they were trying to get the band back together. That and ballistic missiles is a real problem for everyone.But yesterday you told us it was nukes
Iran couldn't hit the US no matter how long we waited. This was about hitting Israel and Rubio admitted that's why it started
Yeah I thought I might be misinterpreting you because my reading wasn't cynical enough, lol. I don't think one party is necessarily better than the other in that regard, although I would be open to the idea that the staunchest parts of MAGA are even more impressionable than most (but that probably applies to both extremes too)Lol
No. Republicans don’t care about people being killed anywhere. They are not selectively protesting. Hell, they were opposed to the Iran attack…..until they were not.
But isn’t that just the opposite side of the same coin?
We have a fleet and assets in the region to support our assets in the Persian Gulf area. You're inventing a narrative.Supporting Israel is the second bullet point. We're prioritizing protecting them over own bases in the Gulf. Treasonous behavior in my opinion.
