Iran

#3,452
#3,452
Sounds like Iran hasn't shot their wad. I think they still have many more missiles left. The nuclear threat, if that's really the objective, must be neutralized and this needs to stop.

I'm not so sure we aren't just galvanizing the Iranian people at this point.
 
#3,454
#3,454
This definitely seems like it had the biggest impact of any wave they’ve sent so far. Infrastructure and likely injury wise too
 
#3,455
#3,455
Smokey123 said:
This definitely seems like it had the biggest impact of any wave they’ve sent so far. Infrastructure and likely injury wise too
Click to expand...
And no coverage by the networks.

Edit: CNN just cut in with a short cut of video
 
Last edited:
#3,456
#3,456
Vol8188 said:
So you watched a small section of a video and just assumed it told the full story and then asked me numerous times why Tulsi stated something that she didn’t actually state?

And you’re asking me if it’s still stupid and meaningless? 100%. Now that you know her opinion is the opposite of yours, did it change anything? Of course not. When you claimed her opinion was opposite of mine, did it change anything? Of course not.

It’s been nonsense from the start
Click to expand...
She didn't state what I mentioned her saying and what the video showed her saying? That's interesting.
Did the second 'new' part of her statement prove the first part to be wrong? Where's the rest of her statement?
Why would you say her opinion is 100% opposite of mine? Remember that I said at least twice that I didn't know, and neither do you, what Iran was up to, and found Tulsi's statement to be of interest given her position.
 
#3,460
#3,460
Smokey123 said:
If Iran wasnt f***ed before they definitely will be now. I imagine the IDF will hit back much harder.
Click to expand...
And that's not going to achieve anything but escalation....... Just hit the nuclear facilities and be done at this point.

This is spiralling.
 
#3,465
#3,465
"@grok Explain likely outcomes for middle eastern region, if the current IRI regime falls, the Shah's son returns to Iran as a figure head, and Iranians shift from a theocracy to a more representational form of Government. How would this shape conflict in the region and relationships most likely? What would likely be the result for the Iranian people? Explain this like you're Samual L Jackson's portrayel of Jules Winnfield."

Alright, listen up, motherf**ker, here’s the deal, Jules Winnfield style, layin’ it down straight from the heart of the Middle East mess. If the IRI regime in Iran gets its a** kicked to the curb, and the Shah’s boy, Reza Pahlavi, strolls back in as some kinda figurehead, sh**’s gonna get wild, but it might just cool things down. Iran’s been slingin’ support to bad*sses like Hezbollah and Hamas, keepin’ the region hotter than a diner coffee pot. With Pahlavi talkin’ peace, especially with Israel—yeah, he’s been prayin’ at the Western Wall, lookin’ for some love there —those proxy wars might dial back, makin’ the Middle East a bit less like a d*mn war zone.
But hold up, it ain’t all roses. Neighbors like Saudi Arabia might see Iran trippin’ and try to flex, stirrin’ up more drama. The West? They’d probably pop champagne, lift sanctions, and start tradin’ with a new, friendlier Iran, but Russia and China ain’t gonna be happy losin’ their buddy, so they might throw some shade.
Now, for the Iranian people, this could be like Ezekiel 25:17-level redemption. More freedom, less of that censorship bullsh*t, women gettin’ their rights back—sh*t they’ve been screamin’ for since Mahsa Amini got done dirty Amnesty International. Sanctions gone could mean more cash, jobs, and a better life. But, man, the road there’s gonna be bumpier than a hitman’s conscience. Power fights, chaos, maybe even some Revolutionary Guard *ssholes tryin’ to hold on—could turn into a straight-up sh*tshow, like Iraq after Saddam.
So, bottom line? Pahlavi’s return could chill the region’s beefs, get Iran cozy with the West, and give its people a shot at freedom and cash. But if they don’t play it right, it’s gonna be a long, bloody walk through the valley of darkness. And that’s the truth, Ruth!
 
#3,466
#3,466
I could be way off base here but I think Iran has switched up tactics with their ballistics. Instead of casting a wide net they are saturating smaller areas with multiple warheads. Getting one out of 5 in a concentrated area instead of 1 out of 20 in a wider area.
 
#3,467
#3,467
I can't even censor it enough to post it here, but a double dog dare you all to ask grok to "Explain Ezekiel 25:17 like you're Jules Winnfield".....EPIC
 
#3,468
#3,468
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Iran better start praying to their phony false god who cares less about their loyalty.
I bet the Ayatollah is hiding his ass in the deepest darkest cave there.
Click to expand...

It flies pretty much everyday an there is more than one.

Secretary Hegseth used one to travel to different US military facilities/bases across the world after he took office.
 
#3,469
#3,469
KB5252 said:
I could be way off base here but I think Iran has switched up tactics with their ballistics. Instead of casting a wide net they are saturating smaller areas with multiple warheads. Getting one out of 5 in a concentrated area instead of 1 out of 20 in a wider area.
Click to expand...
Kinda makes you wonder what equipment was brought in on those CCP cargo planes. Dunit? Accuracy seems improved.
 
#3,471
#3,471
KB5252 said:
I have no idea what you're taking about. I assume you mean China sent some arms?
Click to expand...
No one knows.....China sent several large cargo plains in last 24 hours, they faked a flight path to Europe but then deviated to Iran...which made it seem obviously clandestine. Some think they brought some sort of supplies or weapons. Some think it was to remove incrimating evidence that might be found later. Some think it is some of the regime fleeing Iran.....only the CCP and IRI knows. Or if our intelligence knows they haven't said. I'll try and find report again.
 
#3,472
#3,472
EasternVol said:
Do you think the world was agreeable to North Korea, India and Pakistan getting the bomb? Or did the policing fail, and how?
Click to expand...
That's 3 countries in 50 years who've gone nuclear and less would be better but that's not a terrible track record for the world.

Pakistan responded to India going nuclear. India felt threatened by China. That's regional power balancing which isn't good but makes at least a little sense. Cold War politics and arms races were a completely different era of little global cooperation and that's when most countries went nuclear. The world is better without the Cold War arms race.

North Korea going nuclear was a world tragedy China and Russia allowed to happen and never, ever should have but there was no option of anyone else stopping them without triggering another Korean War. South Korea obviously couldn't, the US obviously couldn't, and China and Russia didn't.

People hate the global economy and globalism in general but the world is much, much, much smaller when missiles can travel thousands of miles. Protecting the yourself means more than just the southern border invasion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#3,474
#3,474
Iran is the rogue proxy State the CCP can use to arm America and our allies enemies in Africa and the Middle East. They give money to Iran who then gives it to these groups to do their bidding. It's kinda the opposite of money laundering. It's a way to blame someone else while being funded by ccp.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top