Well teams like Boise State and TCU thrive on them and with good coaching sometimes they turn out better than the higher rated players. Take Kellen Moore or Randall Cobb for an example.
If the coaches, who are paid to do it, see something in them, I'm all for it
Coaches put their careers and often alot of money on the line when they take a kid's commitment.
The recruiting sites risk next to nothing. The only people who actually notice when they overrate a player is the fans of the schools that recruited him. People seldom take a whole view of their accuracy. They do reasonably well giving high ratings to guys who deserve it. But for every 4-5* player they promote, they miss 2 that might be just as deserving.
I generally do not overestimate the value of rankings. Remember the goal for those sites is to make money... not win football games or be absolutely accurate.
HOWEVER, I do not want UT modeling their roster after BSU or TCU. Those teams have made a national name by basically playing scrubs all year to get to a BCS bowl game. If UT played 12 developmental games and then one real game... things would be a lot different.
Looks like the coaches are doing their jobs. Couldn't be happier with the class so far, and we have plenty of room to add the "game changing" recruits later this year.
Recruiting sites exposed | College Football Freaks
I know the article is a few days old and some info about certain recruits is inaccurate, but the quotes from Lemming are telling for those who put alot of faith in recruiting services and confirm what most who follow recruiting know: Stars follow offers.
I don't mind this fact, but let's remember that the better our coaches evaluate and develop talent the more rating bumps our commitments will eventually get just like Alabama, Texas, etc.
I'm just glad our coaches take the time to evaluate players like they do. Now for the development...