Interesting Feldman article.

[CheckerboardEndZone]

A big chunk of Fulmer's win percentage came at the expense of two teams. Looking back at the talent that was assembled here at one time one can only imagine what could have been with a good coach.

 

[sjt18]

Cut provided the discipline... he was "dad" while Fulmer was "mom". He kicked them in the rear and set the boundaries... CPF "nurtured" them.

As for Chavis, he was a great LB coach and decent prep week coach. He was a lazy recruiter and terrible on game day when matched against a quality OC. An example is the UCLA loss last year... UT lost because Chow just completely outclassed Chavis in adjustments and playcalling. It should have been embarrassing... but I believe Chavis let the players take the blame. Slade specifically said that they "didn't need to make any adjustments" and laid the blame at the players' feet for not executing.

 

[Other_Guy]

if he was so masterful why did he teach his qb to hand the ball off backwards? And how great is he if his offense consisted of "if you get to 2 Mississippi throw the ball to the stands" from Ainge.

Fulmer and Cut were good together but you know he saw the issues with our OL and QB but said nothing. The lack of depth with our team is on his shoulders as well.

Hey man, dont blame Cut for that handoff, Ainges pinky was in pieces right?