biggestvols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,089
- Likes
- 979
Like it or not, she won't be anonymous once charges are brought. If AJ is arrested and goes through general sessions, she will take the stand at a preliminary hearing. If the DA direct presents to the Grand Jury, she still will likely take the stand on pretrail motions. Either way, if the case is prosecuted and AJ persists in his innocence there will be no way she will not take the stand in open court.
Thankfully, in the greatest country in the world, you have a right to confront and cross examine all witnesses offering proof against you. Also, her name will be on any indictment or affidavit charging AJ. There will be no anonymity if the case is pursued.
Am I the only person here thats a bit disturbed, that the woman who accused Johnson of rape is essentially allowed to do so under total anonymity? While guilty or innocent she is already able to drag Johnson's name through the preverbal mud. I understand that law enforcement could be concerned about her safety, if her name was to be made public. However the same logic could still be applied to Johnson, since for all any of us know he could be guiltless in the matter, and now no matter the outcome his name has already been tarnished. Just does not seem like equal treatment by the law, regarding the accuser and the accused.
![]()
As you can see AJ's name is there for the world to scrutinize, while hers is kept totally private
Thanks for the clarification. The rule is referred to in the indices to TCA as the "rape shield law" which is a misnomer since the general assembly annually approves the rules of evidence by resolution not a bill.Sorry but that's incorrect. Tennessee Rule of Evidence 412 is the Rape Sheild Rule. It basically protects the victim from confronting allegations about her reputation or unrelated prior sexual conduct, with exceptions. In the rape shield hearing, the victim herself can be called to testify. Plus, it's a rule of evidence which is promulgated by the Tenn Supremes. Legislature doesn't govern evidence rules.
Police reports are not available with public records requests until the case is closed.
Keep all names private until at least charges are filed.
.
Am I the only one who gets angry when a woman accuses a man of rape, then in court it is proven that she lied BUT the judicial system lets her go scott free?
How about, you lied to the police? How about you discredited the mans name forever? HOw about if I called the police or fire department on some false pretenses, I would be locked up?
Start locking up the women who lie about rape and this will make them think twice about lying to police and giving a false statement.
The problem we are having in society today is that the criminal justice system is inconsistent and a lot of times unfair. The rich get the high profile lawyers and walk when evidence suggest otherwise. The same crime could be committed by someone poor and they would get time in prison. So now, in that environment, the PC crowd annihilates any high profile case in the public arena via text, Facebook, Twitter etc. This pressure forces something to be done immediately in terms of punishment without regard of evidence or proof outside the criminal justice system. The fair thing to do would have been to let both the ut players play until evidence from a valid investigation was completed. If this would have happened, everyone would have had a fair shake. If the girl was making it up, The two players lives would not have been effected other than the lesson of being careful not to get into those type situations in the future. If they did rape and assault the two girls, they would be locked up for several years and of course be terminated from UT. Unfortunately the NFL and other sports establishments are making rash decisions that could not be lawfully executed in other careers. If I was accused of something and was suspended from my job without having my day in court, then later found out to be innocent, I would and could sue the employer. These players will not be able to do that. It appears if this does turnout to be a made up crime, people will just go sorry our bad. Act like nothing happened, come back. IMO opinion that is a travesty of justice.
Let's just assume for a second that the allegations are true.
Now, pretend this is your daughter. Something that she has been the victim of is out in the news like this with a high profile athlete at a university full of fans who don't care who your daughter is and are hell bent on trashing her name.
That is why her name is anonymous. Don't be so insensitive.
I don't believe accusations warrent suspensions but that's just me. I believe people are innocent until proven guilty. Not just for Vols but all Americans.
Okay lets use your line of thinking. They play then it's true, hows that going to look for the coach and UT?
CBJ did this exactly how he's suppose to.
:loco:
Tennesseeduke
That has never been said. I want them to be thrown under the jail if it's true. But I don't want players that are innocent to be treated as guilty until it is proven.