Illinois is tough. Not many teams can play Ohio St as tough as they did.
It would be kind of cool to see MSU go unbeaten after the situation with Dantonio, and this is their year to make it happen, because soon Michigan will be too good, ND will be up again, Penn State won't be so horrific, and they'll have OSU on the schedule again. I guess I should root for Illinois because it helps OSU in the Big 10 title race.
It would be kind of cool to see MSU go unbeaten after the situation with Dantonio, and this is their year to make it happen, because soon Michigan will be too good, ND will be up again, Penn State won't be so horrific, and they'll have OSU on the schedule again. I guess I should root for Illinois because it helps OSU in the Big 10 title race.
Most people overrated them a lot last year.
Iowa was overrated throughout the season. The Big 10 was horrific, so they weren't exposed. Their close games with the like of Northern Iowa were close because Iowa was mediocre. They play last season again, they probably lose 3 games.How so?
They only lost two games and it was without their starting quarterback. The quarterback that replaced him was a true freshman.
They were beating up on Northwestern before Stanzi got hurt. They didn't score again and barely lost. Then the following week, their freshman QB almost beat Ohio State. Went to overtime.
Georgia Tech was 11-2 going into the bowl games and Iowa held them to 155 yards of offense.
I don't like Iowa but they probably finish the regular season undefeated if Ricky Stanzi doesn't get injured.
Iowa was overrated throughout the season. The Big 10 was horrific, so they weren't exposed. Their close games with the like of Northern Iowa were close because Iowa was mediocre. They play last season again, they probably lose 3 games.
And as far as Georgia Tech, of course they did well. They had a month to prepare for a team
Kirk Ferentz is wildly overrated, and Iowa hasn't ever fielded a legit national title contender while he was here, and they probably never will.
Right. No chance anything turns out different if they played again.The line about playing last year again doesn't make sense. They already played last year and we saw the outcome.
They went 11-1 without playing the best team in the conference and they lost to Iowa State. They got ripped in the bowl game and it was obvious they didn't belong with the elite. They were 10-2 but everyone that watched them new they were going to blow it. They weren't that good. There have been mediocre seasons throughout. Kirk Ferentz has never won the conference outright in his years of being at Iowa, because he's not special.I also disagree completely with the Kirk Ferentz remark. The guy is a d'bag but he was 11-1 after blowing a huge lead to Iowa State and last year was 10-2 only losing with a back up quarterback. That's two years of almost making the national championship.
They lost at Arizona, and they gave up plenty of points.They are 5-1 this year and their only loss was without their offensive coordinator. He was in the hospital.
They aren't even the best in the conference. Ohio State has a considerably better defense than Iowa.I probably hate Iowa and Ferentz more than you do but having to live here, I've seen how good they are. They are pretty good. Their defense rivals the best in the country.
Right. No chance anything turns out different if they played again.
UNI played them opening week. Lots of teams play bad opening week. That says more about how bad Ohio State was then Iowa. Iowa almost beat them with a freshman QB that had only played half of a game coming in. There were multiple teams that Iowa looked average against because that's about where they were. In the SEC, they would have lost 4 or 5.
They went 11-1 without playing the best team in the conference and they lost to Iowa State. They got ripped in the bowl game and it was obvious they didn't belong with the elite. They were 10-2 but everyone that watched them new they were going to blow it. They weren't that good. There have been mediocre seasons throughout. Kirk Ferentz has never won the conference outright in his years of being at Iowa, because he's not special.
They lost at Arizona, and they gave up plenty of points.
They aren't even the best in the conference. Ohio State has a considerably better defense than Iowa.
See bold.But that doesn't make any sense. Saying "it would be different" if they played again is completely irrelevant. The games are over with. That's how things work. You get one chance in college football. They made the most of theirs.
They may have made themost of their opportunity, but that was still only good for second. I doubt Ferentz ever wins the Big 10 outright.
Again, talking about who they did and didn't play is irrelevant. They can only play who is on their schedule.
Agreed. Too bad for them Iowa State was on the schedule.
You didn't watch the Arizona game did you? Arizona put up 21 points on 13 yards of offense
7-0 -- Blocked punt. 13 yard drive.
14-0 -- 85 yard int for a touchdown.
21-7 -- 100 yard kick return for a touchdown.
It's not like they shut Arizona down. They still gave up close to 400 yards of offense.
Lastly... Iowa has allowed 10.2ppg this year compared to Ohio State's 13.5ppg. How is that better? I don't know what Ohio State's defense ranked last year but I believe Iowa's ranked 8th in the country.
The best team they have played so far didn't exactly struggle to score on them. OSU's defense is definitely better, and if they lose a game, it will likely be because Pryor.