If we play like we did 1/1/07

#27
#27
Next year will be interesting, we will have a top 3 recruiting class in their junior season, and probably at least a top 5 class as freshman, not to mention a solid returning QB, RB, LBs and other various players.

On paper, we should contend for the SEC title - if not, there will be no doubt that our coaching staff isn't cutting the mustard. I know many of you have already come to this conclusion, but my point is you start building a solid supportable case for the administration to make a change.
 
#29
#29
I am sick of hearing about how the SEC is sooooo much better. The truth is that there are about 5 programs that are elite split up in all the major conf. and some really decent teams in all conf. The SEC is not the best conf, but may have the most talent. Wasted talent at that.
 
#32
#32
allvol123 said:
Arkansas is not really smash mouth, just because they rely on the run. More mis-direction and gadgets.
Click to expand...
Our lip was bleeding pretty good after the game
and I think we had a couple of loose teeth!
 
#34
#34
milohimself said:
Why, because SEC style of football is the be-all end-all? Ask Alabama and Arkansas how that smash mouth is working.
Click to expand...
Not sure what Alabama and Arkansas have to do with Cal being an even weaker team than UT, but anyway, if UT can't impose some sort of physical game against Cal, then they don't have a chance against LSU, Florida, Arkansas, etc.
 
#36
#36
tvolsfan said:
No, because cal isn't a good football team..
Click to expand...

tidwell said:
Not sure what Alabama and Arkansas have to do with Cal being an even weaker team than UT, but anyway, if UT can't impose some sort of physical game against Cal, then they don't have a chance against LSU, Florida, Arkansas, etc.
Click to expand...
There you go. Say what you mean. Saying Cal is a wussy team is fine (and true), but different than comparing finesse vs. smashmouth.
 
#37
#37
Yes, so if they get pushed around and beat by that kind of team (Cal), what are their chances against the better SEC teams?
 
#39
#39
tidwell said:
Yes, so if they get pushed around and beat by that kind of team (Cal), what are their chances against the better SEC teams?
Click to expand...

We did devour their rushing game, and if they ran well on us, it wouldn't be a good sign.
 
#41
#41
one game doesnt definie a year of football. We've had highs and lows the whole year. This team had 5-6 talent and went 9-4. Yes i'm disappointed about yesterday and some of the coaching, especially with the handeling of the running backs but I'm happy with this year. When the talent level gets back up, which it is looking like it will, we'll be back up there.
 
#44
#44
tvolsfan said:
We had so much better than 5-6 talent.
Click to expand...
really how is that? The only guys we have that will do anything big in the NFL is Meachem, Just Harrell and Arron Sears. We'll have guys that will make rosters and do practice squad but those are the only 3 NFL guys we have. You look at our glory years, even the Clausen years, and the teams around us, there is a major difference in talent from this years team to years past.
 
#45
#45
mattvols said:
really how is that? The only guys we have that will do anything big in the NFL is Meachem, Just Harrell and Arron Sears. We'll have guys that will make rosters and do practice squad but those are the only 3 NFL guys we have. You look at our glory years, even the Clausen years, and the teams around us, there is a major difference in talent from this years team to years past.
Click to expand...
Oh, so we overachieved this year!
 
#46
#46
Never mind that recent #1 recruiting class, or the string of top 5's.The only thing missing is someone whocan develop them.

I guess you would say Boise St. has better talent than Oklahoma too.
 
#47
#47
We have a bunch of talented young guys, but alot of them havent even got on the field yet and the ones that have with the exception of coker have been disappointing because they are so young.
 
#48
#48
mattvols said:
We have a bunch of talented young guys, but alot of them havent even got on the field yet and the ones that have with the exception of coker have been disappointing because they are so young.
Click to expand...
Their the same age as Fla's frosh and soph!
 
#49
#49
mattvols said:
We have a bunch of talented young guys, but alot of them havent even got on the field yet and the ones that have with the exception of coker have been disappointing because they are so young.
Click to expand...

They aren't on the field because they haven't been developed correctly.

That argument doesn't hold water.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top