I m just going by what three attorneys were talking about at lunch. They have made a living for many years and i have no reason to doubt what they are saying . Beecher your just a troll and a liar . Just watch how long it takes to hire a coach after this is over. If it happens quick i will assume you are right . But it isnt going to happen that way. I don't think for a minute that Currie is out there talking to employed coaches under contract and there hasnt been a press release. I will believe attorneys over two dumbasses on a message board. I included you saintloius so you dont feel left out.
If you can't read that story and understand that you are wrong, how can you understand what your attorney friends were even talking about?
There are only three reasons possible an AD would be FORCED to seek permissions from another AD prior to speaking to a coach under contract.
1.
It's illegal as defined by federal or state law. Obviously, that is not the case. You asked for examples of coaches who were hired without the hiring school first soliciting permission. The news story cites a number of them.
2.
It is a violation of the governing body's rules. As was stated in the story, the NFL has such a rule. The NCAA does not.
3.
It is a violation of a specific clause in the sitting coach's contract. This is possible, but it would be based on the terms of individual's contract. In that case, the coach would have to inform the soliciting school that he can't speak with them. The Wisconsin AD mentions that he planned to put language like that in future contracts after Bret Bielema walked without him having a clue it was going to happen. As the story states, most contracts do not have that kind of language.
But, none of this matters to you, as you are obviously just trying to wallow in your own little mud hole of misery regarding the coaching situation, and you are upset that you haven't been placated by Jones getting run out of town on a rail.