We could easily compete for a SEC Championship with a great scheme, better fundamentals and vastly improved Special Teams play. The right coach could have this team in the mix w/i 1-2 years.
Then I think we should keep Fulmer, he can do the same in that period of time.most likely....5-6 years, assuming we dont fall completely apart the year we get him
Then I would be all for the change!We could easily compete for a SEC Championship with a great scheme, better fundamentals and vastly improved Special Teams play. The right coach could have this team in the mix w/i 1-2 years.
- LSU
Last two years with DiNardo:
1998: 4-7
1999: 3-8
First four years with Saban.
2000: 8-4
2001: 10-3 (SEC Championship)
2002: 8-5
2003: 13-1 (SEC Championship, National Championship)
- Georgia
Jim Donnan in his last two seasons.
1999: 8-4
2000: 8-4
First four years with Mark Richt:
2001: 8-4
2002: 13-1 (SEC Championship)
2003: 11-3
2004: 10-2
- Florida
Ron Zook in his last two seasons.
2003: 8-5
2004: 7-5
First four years with Urban Meyer:
2005: 9-3
2006: 13-1 (SEC Championship, National Championship)
2007: 9-4
2008: 3-0 (TBD, #4 in the country right now)
- Southern Cal
Paul Hackett in his last two seasons.
1999: 6-6
2000: 5-7
First four years with Pete Carroll:
2001: 6-6
2002: 11-2 (PAC 10 Championship)
2003: 12-1 (PAC 10 Championship, National Championship)
2004: 13-0 (PAC 10 Championship, National Championship)
If you don't make the right hire, then it may take awhile. Another example is Michigan with Rich Rodriguez, & them struggling this season. When Rodriguez gets a quarterback for his system, eventually he'll have Michigan back at the top.
Yeah i agree that should be what happens. The AD won't do that he's a idiot. I don't care that he hired bruce pearl he's a idiot.Would you want your son to play for Fulmer??We need to get him out now , and let the one of the Assistance Coaches take the team to a Bowl game > The team seems to not want to play for Fulmer