If TENNESSEE wants to win...

#26
#26
Gus malzahn-head coach
Jim cheney- oc
Trooper Taylor- Wr
Jay grahem- rb
Sam Pittman-ol

Sal sunseri - as far away as possible
Me- I don't know the answer for our defense..


Lol @ your coaching lineup. Lol @ the mobile qb crap too. Our qb isn't the problem by far. How many times has Bray been sacked? Like 4? Mobile qbs are only as good as the rest of the team just like a pocket qb.
 
#27
#27
I don't think Tennessee needs a dual threat QB. Most of the SEC teams don't, they have a QB thats able to scramble, but they don't rely on it. What Tennessee needs is a good defense thats able to perform day in and day out. We also need a more consistant passing and running game.
 
#29
#29
Your an idiot. The top 5 qbs in the NFL are all pocket passers and what we need is a defense, Our offense is fine.
while I agree with your statement, you shouldn't be calling anyone an idiot if you cant use "your" properly.
 
#30
#30
I'm not gonna address every poster one by one, but I will explain my objective... my suggestions to our next coaching hire is influenced by what I see coming back, and what would make the most sense in hiring a new coach.. A spread offense minded coach! I don't condone putting a square in a round circle(peterman coached to be "pro" style),, and, I refuse to believe TENNESSEE can out recruit the likes of bammer and Flarduh(because of geographical circumstances)! So, we need to out scheme them! I hate it, but it is what it is..
 
#31
#31
It'll be by a dual threat QB, I've watched a lot of football and we need a dual threat Qb.. Hell, Peyton couldn't get it done, and Tee made it happen!
I tend to agree. Last timewe won an NC was with a mobile, Tony Robinson type QB, in Tee Martin.

There is no denying that his mobility got Tennessee out of some jams, and that helped propel us to an undefeated season. Peterman might fill that role fairly well, but just in case, I really want the next staff to recruit Asiante (sp?) Woulard. He got rave reviews during the ESPN Elite 11 (he won it actually), and both he and his dad WANT a UT offer (he really likes it here).

We already have Reilly Ferguson, but considering the fact that we still have two question marks behind Bray, I think it would be smart to take 2 QB's in this class.

Why? Cause we had 3 question marks at QB while Kiffin was here, and we know how that panned out. Better to hedge our bets and take an extra one, who we feel may be able to blossom into an SEC caliber QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#32
#32
It'll be by a dual threat QB, I've watched a lot of football and we need a dual threat Qb.. Hell, Peyton couldn't get it done, and Tee made it happen!

Dual threat QBs can play defense. The usually make very good LBS and safeties. Problems with dual threat QBs is they no longer want to play as a LB or safety. Our offense has done very well with the ones we have now.
 
#33
#33
I'm not gonna address every poster one by one, but I will explain my objective... my suggestions to our next coaching hire is influenced by what I see coming back, and what would make the most sense in hiring a new coach.. A spread offense minded coach! I don't condone putting a square in a round circle(peterman coached to be "pro" style),, and, I refuse to believe TENNESSEE can out recruit the likes of bammer and Flarduh(because of geographical circumstances)! So, we need to out scheme them! I hate it, but it is what it is..

Again you don't know much. The spread doesn't have to have a mobile qb. I see us running out of the gun & pistol a helluva lot & that's not exactly pro style. We run multiple plays from multiple formations like a lot of successful teams. It's not like there's a problem with the offense any damn way so it's a moot argument.
 
#34
#34
Everyone bringing up the defense and why my post address's the offense(for next year) STFU!!! Go comatosed and I'll talk to you at sunrise.. For the rest of you, bray is gone.. Hunter is gone(has a kid to support) 1st rd. CP-gone 6th pick. We need to address what we have coming back, and the kind of leadership we need to take us to the next level. Gus Malzahn?
 
#35
#35
Everyone bringing up the defense and why my post address's the offense(for next year) STFU!!! Go comatosed and I'll talk to you at sunrise.. For the rest of you, bray is gone.. Hunter is gone(has a kid to support) 1st rd. CP-gone 6th pick. We need to address what we have coming back, and the kind of leadership we need to take us to the next level. Gus Malzahn?

We got 3 games left this year. Nobody is gone yet. Nobody wants damn malzahn anyway. You're making stupid points about moot scenarios. At least make stupid points on things that are relevant. Thanks.
 
#36
#36
Again you don't know much. The spread doesn't have to have a mobile qb. I see us running out of the gun & pistol a helluva lot & that's not exactly pro style. We run multiple plays from multiple formations like a lot of successful teams. It's not like there's a problem with the offense any damn way so it's a moot argument.

Yeah.. Everytime a plays broken up, bray runs for 25! You're missing my point! And to ur point "the spread doesn't have to have a mobile Qb"? Are you really this stupid????? A SUCCESSFUL one does!!!
 
#37
#37
Yeah.. Everytime a plays broken up, bray runs for 25! You're missing my point! And to ur point "the spread doesn't have to have a mobile Qb"? Are you really this stupid????? A SUCCESSFUL one does!!!

If you're being critical Bray's play you are a moron. He's been sacked how many times? Hawaii went to a bcs bowl running the spread with a pocket passer. Texas Tech. How many pocket passers from Houston won the Heisman. You're pretty stupid aren't you. Get off the ps3 or Xbox or whatever & come back to reality.
 
#38
#38
We got 3 games left this year. Nobody is gone yet. Nobody wants damn malzahn anyway. You're making stupid points about moot scenarios. At least make stupid points on things that are relevant. Thanks.

hang onto this year moron. It's your last one with your hero Dooley, goog riddance to you both next year!
 
#39
#39
If you're being critical Bray's play you are a moron. He's been sacked how many times? Hawaii went to a bcs bowl running the spread with a pocket passer. Texas Tech. How many pocket passers from Houston won the Heisman. You're pretty stupid aren't you. Get off the ps3 or Xbox or whatever & come back to reality.

You're to stupid to have a conversation with.. I've stated numerous times that my argument is about this team moving forward! I'm done with ur mental midget azz!!
 
#40
#40
You're to stupid to have a conversation with.. I've stated numerous times that my argument is about this team moving forward! I'm done with ur mental midget azz!!

You're TOO stupid to realize how stupid you are. Go play Xbox some more & maybe we can get Paul Johnson in here to run the wing-T triple option. Lol. Dumbass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#41
#41
It'll be by a dual threat QB, I've watched a lot of football and we need a dual threat Qb.. Hell, Peyton couldn't get it done, and Tee made it happen!

C'mon man! I love Tee but its a team sport and Tee had a great defense and run game. They barely let Tee take off the training wheels until about game 7.
 
#42
#42
Pure, unadulterated hogwash. There is nothing sacred about a dual-threat quarterback per se. We have enjoyed great success with mobile QBs (Shuler and Martin) and pure dropback passers (Manning). Tee certainly made a significant contribution to winning the '98 title, but that team was significantly stronger on both sides of the line of scrimmage than the previous year's squad. You want proof? The '97 team scored 411 points, the '98 team 408. The '97 team, however, ran for 1813 yds. and 13 tds, whereas the '98 team ran for a SEC-best 2,536 yds. and 27 tds (http://www.utsports.com/sports/m-footbl/guides/2012/records.pdf ). The '97 team gave up 244 points. By contrast, the '98 team surrendered only 173 points.

If you want to know who deserves the most credit for that championship, I would point the finger squarely at Al Wilson's leadership and the overall performance of the defense. Strong running game and defense, particularly against the run, has been a winning formula in the SEC for an awfully long time. That formula is what Alabama's current success is predicated upon. Although he might not enjoy doing so, Neyland would certainly give his stamp of approval to 'Bama's current style of play.

This exactly. I posted before I read this. Plus this actually contains factual information which is rare on a message board.
 
#43
#43
C'mon man! I love Tee but its a team sport and Tee had a great defense and run game. They barely let Tee take off the training wheels until about game 7.[/]

Blah blah blah.. Did they win it with Tee or Peyton? And stop acting like Peyton had less talent around him than Tee..
 
#44
#44
This exactly. I posted before I read this. Plus this actually contains factual information which is rare on a message board.

If you want "factual information".. The 98 team won a National Championship!

Da'rick Dooley only knows shower technique..(maybe)

Gus Malzahn just beat Ul-Monroe 45-23.. The same year Auburn barely escaped them.. And they beat Arkansas!! At Arkansas St..
 
#48
#48
Yeah I agree with you having a running QB will help us a lot cause when bray arm is off our team is doomed
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#50
#50
Tee was mobile and athletic but he didn't run the option

Never said he did.. But, was he a threat to make something happen with his feet? I apologize I don't know the name of an offense where a Qb can escape the pocket and make something happen with his feet not named "a spread"..
 
Advertisement



Back
Top