If Clawson Would Have Stayed At Richmond....

Lets go over some things.

1. Fulmer called one out of every 3 offensive plays.
2. No one outside of Scott bought into this system and taught it well.
3. Richmond has a smarter team than we do.
4. Only 50% of the playbook was available for playcalls
5. We had an average to below average line.
6. We had no QB.

It's easy to see why he had no success. No one could have made the offense much better. Especially since it's known that it takes a while for him to get his system in.

If Richmond's team was so much smarter they probably would have won more than 3 games Clawson's first season.
 
Yeah, I think the other posters who called you out as 14 year old pretty much got it right. Now run on back over to your Wii forum and talk about something you actually know about & leave football for the grown folks.

But hey, look at the bright side.....you parents may let you sit at the big table this year for Christmas dinner.:eek:hmy:

That's a great idea.....too bad u'r too high to even know what u're sayin'......go get high some more, rockyhigh, and fly off a cliff............:eek:lol:
 
Damn, started this thread thinking I'd get a bunch of yes or no answers. Should have known better.... continue.:popcorn:
 
I tried to send Clawson a Christmas Card to thank him in being instrumental in getting Fulmer out of here. It was returned to me go figure
 
I tried to send Clawson a Christmas Card to thank him in being instrumental in getting Fulmer out of here. It was returned to me go figure

send it to Bowling Green, I'm sure they'll see that he gets it

they're still in the Honeymoon stages
 
and they were 3-8, 4-7 and 2-9 the three years before he got there. Take that for what it's worth.

And they were 3-8 and 6-5 two of his four years there. Big deal.

I was as big a DC fan as there was. Fact is he failed. Maybe he'll do fine at BG, but claiming his resume supports him being a huge success before coming to UT is just plain false.
 
It's pretty simple. Richmond won it all after Clawson left. Take that for what it's worth.


This point was made a long time ago in this post. UT also won the BCS the year after Peyton left. Your argument is baseless. Please never post again.
 
And they were 3-8 and 6-5 two of his four years there. Big deal.

I was as big a DC fan as there was. Fact is he failed. Maybe he'll do fine at BG, but claiming his resume supports him being a huge success before coming to UT is just plain false.

Taking Fordham from zero wins to the quarterfinals in three seasons seems to be a pretty big success. Taking Richmond to the playoffs when they were picked to finish last in the league seems like a pretty big success. Winning coach of the year seems to be a pretty big success. Like I said a moment earlier, please don't post for at least three hours.
 
This point was made a long time ago in this post. UT also won the BCS the year after Peyton left. Your argument is baseless. Please never post again.

Dang,
I understand what you are trying to say. Players leave a different mark than coaches do however. Better example would be what Butch Davis left Larry Coker with to win a NC. Coker later showed he was not the man for the job, after what Davis built was in the NFL.
 
Dang,
I understand what you are trying to say. Players leave a different mark than coaches do however. Better example would be what Butch Davis left Larry Coker with to win a NC. Coker later showed he was not the man for the job, after what Davis built was in the NFL.

Ask the people in Tampa who they believe should get more credit for their SuperBowl...Dungy or Gruden?

It's all in perception. Some coaches (Dungy,Davis) leave a program to where the successor can be successful. Others...like Charlie Weiss...can leave a program with an uphill battle when they leave. (Next year)...
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Advertisement



Back
Top