You also said he was playing at an all SEC level at that point last year. The SC backs were real game changers last year weren't they. He still only passed for 270 yards and had 0 TD's, don't say that that is playing well and then give me excuses about why he actually didn't. You contridicted yourself.
44 points isnt bad. Blake Mitchell wasnt the one giving up 36 points man.
Ainge leading the Vols to 51 points against UGA (finished with a top 10 D if i'm not mistaken) wasn't too shabby. everybody and their brother could hang 44 on Houston. they're probably not even the 3rd best team in their state
I thought he played well, read my last explanation of the Clemson game... It wasnt his best game but he played well.
This is typical Gamecock diarrhea that we those of us who live around their fans hear constantly. It's always about next year.
Ainge leading the Vols to 51 points against UGA (finished with a top 10 D if i'm not mistaken) wasn't too shabby. everybody and their brother could hang 44 on Houston. they're probably not even the 3rd best team in their state
So what are you saying.
BTW we scored more than any other team against Houston.
I was contradicting his statement which said everybody and their brother could hang 44 against Houston.
i'm saying ALL-SEC type QB's show up in big games and WIN them (like Ainge did against uga). i would hardly consider Houston a big game and a good performance was expected from Mitchell i would assume considering the talent (or lack thereof) he was playing against