I thought....

#2
#2
Were you being sarcastic? I thought he looked great, and they beat the Eagles on the road. I thought this was a bad matchup for the Bears since the Eagles have a good pass rush without bringing the blitz, but they handled it.
 
#3
#3
1) Who in this forum says Cutler is "all-world?"
2) He looked pretty dang good last night.
 
#4
#4
nbakerld said:
Were you being sarcastic? I thought he looked great, and they beat the Eagles on the road. I thought this was a bad matchup for the Bears since the Eagles have a good pass rush without bringing the blitz, but they handled it.
Click to expand...

He looked terrible at the time.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#7
#7
The win had more to do with the Bears running at will against a pathetic rush defense than Cutler being awesome imo.
 
#9
#9
BearCat204 said:
The win had more to do with the Bears running at will against a pathetic rush defense than Cutler being awesome imo.
Click to expand...

It was definitely a little of both. The rush attack was more pivotal, but like you said the Eagles run D isn't great. With a mediocre O line and group of receivers, Cutler put up good numbers against a talented secondary and D line.
 
#10
#10
Earl Bennett makes that much of a difference in that offense? I thought Cutler was above average in that game. I scooped him up on my fantasy team.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top