I wanted Kiffin to do well.
I wanted Dooley to do well.
I wanted Butch to do well.
I want the next coach to do well.
So WTF is new?
Fulmer never called plays, neither did Cutcliffe. They turned out find. The promoting in and of itself was not the problem as you're making it out to be.
Are you really trying to defend these three. Fulmer and
Cutcliffe had proven themselves to the head coaches that hired them by being on successful staffs for years. There is no comparison here.
You are dumber than you make yourself out to be.
All I did is poke a hole in your simpleton comment. I'm not defending anything.
I really did. I like him. The simple truth is he was given a great opportunity here but failed. It was his own fault. The buck stops with the HC.
I wish the best for him and his family but it is hard to feel sorry for someone making millions of dollars off UT.
Wish it would have turned out different.
Keep trying doofus. As usual, you type before you think.
If you can't see the difference between someone who has been on a winning staff for several years being promoted vs a grad asst and two other guys with no experience with UT and the positions they are in, you have no room to call any idea simple.
I wanted him to do well also.
I was critical. Many didn't like that. But the patterns and trends within his decisions and small scale results is what has brought us to this point. He's had injury issues since the second year. The offensive scheme has been a problem from the start. Attrition and/or poor recruit selection has been a problem. Development is a problem.
None of the things being talked about now are new. Many if not most were evident by the Vandy loss of year 1 and certainly no later than the UF loss of year 3.