I predict the Butch Jones saga will end like the.....

#51
#51
Since 1958 (including 3 games this year) my beloved Vols have an average winning percentage of .661. In the last 60 years, we've won 10 or more games 13 times. Let that sink in for a minute. Granted, we didn't play as many games back in the day, but the percentage speaks for itself.

Coach Phil Fulmer had the most double digit victory years (8) and averaged .734 over his career, but only averaged .570 over his last four years.

Butch Jones, including three games this year, has a winning percentage of .601, and .585 his first four years.

Over the course of 12 games, using .661 as a base, the average victories per year would be 7.93 (8) wins per year. Including a bowl game, the number would be 8.59 (9) wins per year.

If Butch Jones were to match Fulmer's average (.734) this year, we would win 8.8 games (let's say 9 out of 12 games) and 10 games including one bowl game victory. Apparently, according to the experts on this board, in order to simply keep your job as Tennessee head coach, you're going to have to have a magic year every year.

You're over playing the 10 game thing considering teams have only play 10 games per year for the majority of football history and we have sucked for 30% of the team they've played more.

You quote averages but fail to mention that very fact, it's an average. Thus a coach will win some above and some below that average number. How likely is it that Butch will win some above that average? You're also not acknowledging how the past 10yrs has significantly hurt our winning percentage.

It's about being competitive for championships. Do you feel, based on the performance on the field, that Butch Jones will have TN legitimately positioned to be competitive on a championship level consistently at some point?

Johnny and Phil where here for 32yrs combined. Johnny came back because he wanted to return TN to the football power we were when he was in school here. It took him awhile but he did it and Phil finished the job. Why should we discount their hard work and go back to accepting less than the championship expectations that each of those VFL's had for this program? They proved that TN can be on top of the mountain and should always expect to compete at the highest level.

Not every season will be 10-11 wins but we should have a staff capable of achieving those types of years. No?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#52
#52
Fulmer would still be here if he had hired the right OC

The AD wouldn't give him money to hire a coach. Clawson was considered one of the top up and coming coaches in the country and has P5 job today. He's a successful coach. Fulmer wanted to hire Debord but Hamilton wouldn't give him the money to do it.

Hamilton sabataged Phil on purpose.
 
#53
#53
Lets all pray that Butchie bolts, but thats not going to happen. He's going to stay and ride it out as long as Currie allows inflicting as much pain on the fan base as he possibly can.

BTW, its worth reminding that this clown is 0-1 vs. Dooley, and 0-3 vs. Mushchamps.
 
#56
#56
Lets all pray that Butchie bolts, but thats not going to happen. He's going to stay and ride it out as long as Currie allows inflicting as much pain on the fan base as he possibly can.

BTW, its worth reminding that this clown is 0-1 vs. Dooley, and 0-3 vs. Mushchamps.

I'm sure if Butch has truly lost donor support Currie would have some feelers out there and if there is a realistic chance to get a big hire they'd make the move. I don't think spending the money has ever been a problem, it's just never made sense to do so at the times we've made moves.
 
#61
#61
Since 1958 (including 3 games this year) my beloved Vols have an average winning percentage of .661. In the last 60 years, we've won 10 or more games 13 times. Let that sink in for a minute. Granted, we didn't play as many games back in the day, but the percentage speaks for itself.

Coach Phil Fulmer had the most double digit victory years (8) and averaged .734 over his career, but only averaged .570 over his last four years.

Butch Jones, including three games this year, has a winning percentage of .601, and .585 his first four years.

Over the course of 12 games, using .661 as a base, the average victories per year would be 7.93 (8) wins per year. Including a bowl game, the number would be 8.59 (9) wins per year.

If Butch Jones were to match Fulmer's average (.734) this year, we would win 8.8 games (let's say 9 out of 12 games) and 10 games including one bowl game victory. Apparently, according to the experts on this board, in order to simply keep your job as Tennessee head coach, you're going to have to have a magic year every year.

Don't know where you're getting your data, Bob, but it's off.

Phil Fulmer's career win % is .745. His record was 152-52 ... or 152 wins in 204 games.

Also, the stats you chose are misleading. You say we had 13 seasons out of the last 60 with 10 or more wins. That sounds uncommon, almost rare. Less than one year in four.

But you could've instead said, and been just as true, that we've had 11 seasons in the past 30 with 10 or more wins. That's better than 1-in-3. Only 4 seasons short of half. And that's even including the entirety of our Dark Ages. Over a third of the time, we got to 10+. Sounds very different when you put it like that, doesn't it?

I understand your point about comparing Butch to Phil. Just think there are better ways to make it.

Fact is, for Butch to reach the metric that Phil set, he would have to average about 9.7 wins per season (that's 74.5% of a 13 game season, including bowl), and get us to Atlanta at least one year of every three (6 trips to Atlanta in 16 years, for Phil).

Using Phil's metric, every year Butch has coached at Tennessee so far has been "below average." Even the past two 9-win seasons of Butch's are below the 9.7-per mark Phil set.

Put it another way: even if Butch were to win every game for the rest of this season, take us to Atlanta, win there, go to the playoffs, and win the national title, go 14-1 this season, and then win 15-0 with Team 122 the following year, never losing a game in 2018, his career win % as a Volunteer (72.8%) would still not match Phil's.

Phil Fulmer set a lofty standard. We, many of us, don't appreciate how good a coach he was. Not Neyland, but far closer to Neyland than any other coach in our 121 year history.

So no, folks aren't saying Butch has to be as good as Phil Fulmer to keep his job. But he does have to compete for and win championships. That's the standard at Tennessee.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#62
#62
Not sure who would really hire Butch. He definitely stabilized our program, and refilled the cupboard with some talent. The issue is, what has he done with it. Year 5 and 1 or 2 injuries and we are in big trouble. He hasn't developed any talent that has come here. We have a set of twins with the last name of Berry that we can only use on special teams! Really!

He'd be hired by a program that needed what UT needed at the time, clean it up, stabilize, start upward trajectory. There are a LOT of those type programs out there..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#63
#63
Butch is a great coach 6 days a week but on that 7th day (Saturday) he's average at best in most games. It's difficult to watch at times, and I don't understand why he can't learn from his mistakes, but he hasn't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#64
#64
You're over playing the 10 game thing considering teams have only play 10 games per year for the majority of football history and we have sucked for 30% of the team they've played more.

You quote averages but fail to mention that very fact, it's an average. Thus a coach will win some above and some below that average number. How likely is it that Butch will win some above that average? You're also not acknowledging how the past 10yrs has significantly hurt our winning percentage.

It's about being competitive for championships. Do you feel, based on the performance on the field, that Butch Jones will have TN legitimately positioned to be competitive on a championship level consistently at some point?

Johnny and Phil where here for 32yrs combined. Johnny came back because he wanted to return TN to the football power we were when he was in school here. It took him awhile but he did it and Phil finished the job. Why should we discount their hard work and go back to accepting less than the championship expectations that each of those VFL's had for this program? They proved that TN can be on top of the mountain and should always expect to compete at the highest level.

Not every season will be 10-11 wins but we should have a staff capable of achieving those types of years. No?

I shouldn't have to point out that averages are...well, averages. That should be apparent to the "average" reader.

Johnny Majors had a winning percentage of .514 his first 4 years. He was rebuilding, and everyone knew it. He was .683 his next five, and ended up with .655 over his Tennessee coaching career. We were never really an "elite" team under his leadership.

Butch Jones has an average of .585 his first four years, and multitudes are calling for his immediate firing. Was he, and is he still not, rebuilding? Now if we lose to Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt, all a very real possibility, then it should be apparent that he is failing, and has made a major regression at this point. In all likelihood, he would be fired.

I'm not necessarily defending Butch. I'm suggesting that many of our fans have completely unrealistic expectations regarding wins and losses, and those unmet expectations lead to disappointment.

Most pundits had us at 7-5 this year. That could be correct, we'll have to wait and see. I had expectations of a 9-3 year if all went well. That also is still a possibility, but time will tell. Tennessee is a team that can win practically any game on their schedule, but the opposite is also true.

I expect us to compete for the SEC Eastern title every year, including this year. Can we? Are we?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#70
#70
Butch will win big, put all the complainers on a strict diet of crow, and all Vol Fans will rejoice. See you in Atlanta for the SEC-championship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#72
#72
And yet he was fired like he was :loco:

I know.

I'd have given the dude a one-year sabbatical. Told him to go get his head straight, get re-energized, then come back if he thought he was ready. Asked Chief to serve as one-year interim head coach.

We should not have gotten rid of Phil entirely. Bad, bad decision and we've been paying for it ever since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#75
#75
The mistake wasn't firing Fulmer. The mistake was not letting Kippy Brown run the show while you took your time and performed a competent coaching search after Lane left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Advertisement



Back
Top