ZZ13
Saturn V
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 3,216
- Likes
- 3,143
1) The timeout before the filed goal at 20-7. Nothing wrong there. Wanted to make sure his team was ready. So the other coach changed is mind. Still should stop them. But even though they didn't, the team followed that up with their own TD that neutralized Florida's score.
2) Not going for two. I have always held the philosophy that you should only go for two when ahead if you are sure this is going to be your last possession. If you go for 2 and miss, then FL gets two TDs, it then goes for two after its last TD. If it makes that you now need a FG to tie, not win.
My only coaching gripe with yesterday is the handling of the last 30 seconds. When he saw the clock was restarted at 29 seconds he should have rushed the team to spike the ball. Then we would have had a stopped clock with about 20 seconds plus a timeout. Having not done that, then he should have just taken a timeout for the FG at about 5 seconds rather than rushing to spike the ball. Although I think the 5 yards made zero difference in the FG try.
The real problem here is lack of depth in the defense. Its a classic symptom for thin defenses to run out of gas and cave in the fourth quarter, and snatch defeat from victory. Kentucky has made this their way of life for many, many years. Major's early teams did this often as well.
The coaches aren't dumb. You don't get two score leads in the fourth quarter because you don't know what you are doing and/or you are totally predictable.
2) Not going for two. I have always held the philosophy that you should only go for two when ahead if you are sure this is going to be your last possession. If you go for 2 and miss, then FL gets two TDs, it then goes for two after its last TD. If it makes that you now need a FG to tie, not win.
My only coaching gripe with yesterday is the handling of the last 30 seconds. When he saw the clock was restarted at 29 seconds he should have rushed the team to spike the ball. Then we would have had a stopped clock with about 20 seconds plus a timeout. Having not done that, then he should have just taken a timeout for the FG at about 5 seconds rather than rushing to spike the ball. Although I think the 5 yards made zero difference in the FG try.
The real problem here is lack of depth in the defense. Its a classic symptom for thin defenses to run out of gas and cave in the fourth quarter, and snatch defeat from victory. Kentucky has made this their way of life for many, many years. Major's early teams did this often as well.
The coaches aren't dumb. You don't get two score leads in the fourth quarter because you don't know what you are doing and/or you are totally predictable.