Enki_Amenra
Wanna Bet?
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 47,217
- Likes
- 238,340
Yes, and those mistakes have consequences. Coaching at such a high level makes those consequences high as well.Amazing at the people here willing to cast stones, if you’ve lived long enough you’ve made mistakes, mistakes you sincerely regret and wish you had a “do over”. Unfortunately we can only learn from our mistakes and grow and be better in the future. Just because Hugh was guilty once doesn’t make him guilty twice, in fact the argument could be made he’d be less likely to screw up again because it wouldn’t likely end his career.
Most of us who are willing to "cast stones" in this thread aren't really hard asses or anything. We're probably all in favor of Freeze getting another chance in life.Amazing at the people here willing to cast stones, if you’ve lived long enough you’ve made mistakes, mistakes you sincerely regret and wish you had a “do over”. Unfortunately we can only learn from our mistakes and grow and be better in the future. Just because Hugh was guilty once doesn’t make him guilty twice, in fact the argument could be made he’d be less likely to screw up again because it wouldn’t likely end his career.
Under that condition, NO. Freeze or someone else will still be out there if all Heupel does is navigate UT through whatever sanctions come down.Even if you were forced to incur the most severe of NCAA penalties (short of the death penalty) as part of the deal?
Heupel comes with zero penalties in this scenario.
It isn't minimal. It goes to the core of a person's character and trustworthiness. The dismissive attitude people have toward oaths... is a blight on our society.You act like he murdered someone. His "moral weakness" is extremely minimal. We should have gone after Freeze and never looked back.