Even if you truly think that, we’ve seen Kyler against SEC defenses and he wasn’t good. Now all of a sudden he’s some top player cause the Big 12 doesn’t play defense?
Nah the kid is a product of the defenses he’s played against.
Not really, Majors has more of a gripe than PM. JM lost to a guy from ND with no Special stats or anything. Woodson was the best player on the best team, which is normally the prerequisite for winnng the Heisman, has happened that way many, many times. Can give you 30 times where that is the case, minimum. Tonight might be the same if Tua wins it.The biggest Heisman heist was Wooden winning over Manning, totally fueled by media who wanted to see that. Also, Hornung winning in 1956 was a total joke as well. I really don't like popularity contests and those that vote for their regional boys. Makes the validity (to me) kind of a sham. It's the kind of popularity contest that is MLB's All-Star game.
Agree on it being the system in Oklahoma with one caveat, Murray’s rushing this year. Count the TDs together and he is over 50 with 5000 yards.It's not quite fair to judge things this way, but we know having a Heisman caliber player is rare. So, when damn near every starting QB since Jason White wins the Heisman or is in the running, it tends to give credence to the idea that it's the system.
I remember when Andre Ware won his Heisman and the argument was that you just couldn't ignore the unprecedented numbers and then David Klingler put up the same numbers and everyone was like....Oops.
Agree on it being the system in Oklahoma with one caveat, Murray’s rushing this year. Count the TDs together and he is over 50 with 5000 yards.
I know I’ll get flamed, but in all likelihood if Peyton would have beat Florida in 97 he probably would have won. That 89 yard interception was a 14 point flip and very well cost the Vols the game.
Death. Taxes. Tennessee fans whining about a College Football HOF and NFL HOF winning over another College Football HOF and NFL HOF 21 years ago. So ridiculous.
The biggest Heisman heist was Wooden winning over Manning, totally fueled by media who wanted to see that. Also, Hornung winning in 1956 was a total joke as well. I really don't like popularity contests and those that vote for their regional boys. Makes the validity (to me) kind of a sham. It's the kind of popularity contest that is MLB's All-Star game.
Gosh. You’re just too cool for school. Here’s a cookie.
Manning lost because ESPN decided he was going to lose then hyped the heck out of Woodson. We dared to complain as a fan base and along came the ESPN knives and the trailer trash comment.
Screw the heisman. Haven’t cared since 97. Never will.
Maybe Peyton should not have thrown a pick 6 to Tony George and he would have won the Heisman. I think it’s funny (and sad) how people are still upset that somebody didn’t win an individual award 21 years ago. I bet Peyton has let it go.
The next year Bailey had better numbers in every category than Woodson and never got considered.Not really, Majors has more of a gripe than PM. JM lost to a guy from ND with no Special stats or anything. Woodson was the best player on the best team, which is normally the prerequisite for winnng the Heisman, has happened that way many, many times. Can give you 30 times where that is the case, minimum. Tonight might be the same if Tua wins it.
That said, Go Murray!
Edit: I snicker every time I hear any fan ask what Woodson has done since the Heisman.,.