Hrc

#1
mmoosem

mmoosem

GO AWAY NEGA-VOLS
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
231
Likes
133
#1
anyone surprised of the lack of coverage/comments, when HRC once again put her foot n her big mouth when she said .... "we didn't lose anyone in Libya?" :birgits_giggle:
 
#2
#2
mmoosem said:
anyone surprised of the lack of coverage/comments, when HRC once again put her foot n her big mouth when she said .... "we didn't lose anyone in Libya?" :birgits_giggle:
Click to expand...

The DNC and the media will do anything to protect her.
 
#8
#8
lawgator1 said:
When it's part of a quote preceded by ellipses, I'm a bit skeptical of it being out of context as its being touted by the usual band of right wing loon blog repeaters here.
Click to expand...

It's from an interview with Chris Matthews. She was comparing Iraq to Libya and said one reason Libya was different is we didn't lose one single American.

Link in main Hillary thread
 
#11
#11
is that anything like her saying "I did not send or receive classified e-m"? It doesn't matter what it's marked classified or not. It's the content that matters. Just ask the fbi.
 
#12
#12
The bigger story is how much in denial she is about what a cluster Libya has turned out to be.

She's denying it, Obama is blaming it on our allies. Why anyone would proactively want more of either of them is tough to explain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13
#13
volinbham said:
The bigger story is how much in denial she is about what a cluster Libya has turned out to be.

She's denying it, Obama is blaming it on our allies. Why anyone would proactively want more of either of them is tough to explain.
Click to expand...

Have you ever witnessed either take responsibility for anything? Or even remotely admit to a mistake?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14
#14
MG1968 said:
I'm not the dumbass who left out the link in his OP so that people could make up their own minds about what Hillary may or may not have meant.
Click to expand...

is that anything like her saying "I did not send or receive classified e-m"? It doesn't matter what it's marked classified or not. It's the content that matters. Just ask the fbi.
 
#15
#15
MG1968 said:
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/hillary-clinton-we-didnt-lose-a-single-person-in-142322732.html

red meat for the spin machines, but nothing else
Click to expand...


Ok, I read that.

As I suspected, taken completely out of context by OP.

Pretty standard 'round here.

Look, I don't like her. As I've posted, if its her and Kasich, I'm likely to vote for Kasich. But its annoying when the right wing bloggers keep twisting things to create "news" or reports, all crap. See e.g. Breitbart twisting video of Sherrod, the heavily edited and falsified videos of Planned Parenthood, and crap like this.
 
#16
#16
lawgator1 said:
Ok, I read that.

As I suspected, taken completely out of context by OP.

Pretty standard 'round here.

Look, I don't like her. As I've posted, if its her and Kasich, I'm likely to vote for Kasich. But its annoying when the right wing bloggers keep twisting things to create "news" or reports, all crap. See e.g. Breitbart twisting video of Sherrod, the heavily edited and falsified videos of Planned Parenthood, and crap like this.
Click to expand...

It's not completely out of context.

Still, I know what she meant.

On a side note, what was falsified in the PP videos?
 
#17
#17
lawgator1 said:
Ok, I read that.

As I suspected, taken completely out of context by OP.

Pretty standard 'round here.

Look, I don't like her. As I've posted, if its her and Kasich, I'm likely to vote for Kasich. But its annoying when the right wing bloggers keep twisting things to create "news" or reports, all crap. See e.g. Breitbart twisting video of Sherrod, the heavily edited and falsified videos of Planned Parenthood, and crap like this.
Click to expand...

Being that there is even a possibility you wouldn't shows judgement issues on your part.
 
#19
#19
volinbham said:
It's not completely out of context.

Still, I know what she meant.

On a side note, what was falsified in the PP videos?
Click to expand...


They were edited to create false impression of sales. I did not mean false video -- just intentionally misleading by editing.
 
#20
#20
Siap. Something I found that is interesting...




"The startling revelation from Blumenthal is that – even though he was forwarding memos about Libya to Hillary while simultaneously having a business interest there – Blumenthal didn’t write the memos! Instead, they came from a single source, and he was “simply and merely a conduit” for someone else. Whoa!"
Click to expand...

Read more:*Hillary Clinton Is FURIOUS About What Trey Gowdy Told Fox News about a Clinton Insider (WHOA!) - The Political Insider
 
#21
#21
hog88 said:
Being that there is even a possibility you wouldn't shows judgement issues on your part.
Click to expand...


If Kasich wins Ohio tonight and Rubio loses Florida, I strongly disagree.

The race will go more firmly three way. Cruz the evangelical social policy wing (which is growing ever smaller by the day), Trump the outsider wing, and Kasich everyone else that isn't a nutjob or pis$ed off old white dude, of one kind or another.

And he'll have tons of money coming in. If he can keep Trump from getting to 1237 and creating a second vote scenario, he's the nominee.
 
#22
#22
lawgator1 said:
Ok, I read that.

As I suspected, taken completely out of context by OP.

Pretty standard 'round here.

Look, I don't like her. As I've posted, if its her and Kasich, I'm likely to vote for Kasich. But its annoying when the right wing bloggers keep twisting things to create "news" or reports, all crap. See e.g. Breitbart twisting video of Sherrod, the heavily edited and falsified videos of Planned Parenthood, and crap like this.
Click to expand...

and I guess the "right wing bloggers" created her illegal server at her home that she conducted all of her personal/sos activities.:furious3:
 
#24
#24
lawgator1 said:
As I've posted, if its her and Kasich, I'm likely to vote for Kasich.
Click to expand...

lawgator1 said:
If Kasich wins Ohio tonight and Rubio loses Florida, I strongly disagree.

The race will go more firmly three way. Cruz the evangelical social policy wing (which is growing ever smaller by the day), Trump the outsider wing, and Kasich everyone else that isn't a nutjob or pis$ed off old white dude, of one kind or another.

And he'll have tons of money coming in. If he can keep Trump from getting to 1237 and creating a second vote scenario, he's the nominee.
Click to expand...

Do you even read your own posts?
 
#25
#25
MG1968 said:
Gary Johnson 2016 :rock:
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by MG1968 View Post
I'm not the dumbass who left out the link in his OP so that people could make up their own minds about what Hillary may or may not have meant.

is that anything like her saying "I did not send or receive classified e-m"? It doesn't matter what it's marked classified or not. It's the content that matters. Just ask the fbi.

really?? no comment??? hard to argue about the facts isn't it? :dunno:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top