This may be quite the tagent on the eve of a big game and with all the coaching yadda yadda going on but, then again, some may find it an interesting break. At any rate I entered into a pretty serious discussion with someone who was big in comparing this guys accomplishments vs that guys accomplishments based on what I would consider "team" criteria. Once we got started I even found myself taking the stance that, more than any other sport, even "individual" accomplishments can be hugely impacted by forces beyond any individual's control.
Golf/tennis etc are pretty straight forward/no brainers. One person does or doesn't succeed. Assuming you're healthy you win or lose by yourself out there. Basketball and baseball are certainly team sports but c'mon. There's a ton of individualism in those sports.
Then there's football, the ultimate team sport. In fact, there's actually two entirely different "teams" (O/D) per team, and that doesn't include ST. (and even THAT includes punting/kickoff/FG)
How can you compare players with any real accuracy in that environment? Were Smith and Sanders both great backs? Sure. How good would Sanders have been behind that Dallas line? Are we sure that Fouts/Winslow/Joiner/Chandler weren't at least as good as Montana/Rice/Clark/Taylor but the latter had the benefit of Ronnie Lott et.al? What if, say, Pickens had landed in San Fran or Dallas as opposed to the Bengals?
Everybody here could come up with a wave of examples but it all comes back to with a QB so dependent on his line and WR and RB's on the line and WR's on all of the above and on and on how accurate can any of us be in making these sweeping generalizations we all like to make as sports fans about football teams and players?
Opinions?
Golf/tennis etc are pretty straight forward/no brainers. One person does or doesn't succeed. Assuming you're healthy you win or lose by yourself out there. Basketball and baseball are certainly team sports but c'mon. There's a ton of individualism in those sports.
Then there's football, the ultimate team sport. In fact, there's actually two entirely different "teams" (O/D) per team, and that doesn't include ST. (and even THAT includes punting/kickoff/FG)
How can you compare players with any real accuracy in that environment? Were Smith and Sanders both great backs? Sure. How good would Sanders have been behind that Dallas line? Are we sure that Fouts/Winslow/Joiner/Chandler weren't at least as good as Montana/Rice/Clark/Taylor but the latter had the benefit of Ronnie Lott et.al? What if, say, Pickens had landed in San Fran or Dallas as opposed to the Bengals?
Everybody here could come up with a wave of examples but it all comes back to with a QB so dependent on his line and WR and RB's on the line and WR's on all of the above and on and on how accurate can any of us be in making these sweeping generalizations we all like to make as sports fans about football teams and players?
Opinions?