TennesseeTarheel
Sorry, but, this IS my day job.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
- Messages
- 9,620
- Likes
- 15,673
Good points, but I still think its going to cause problems.Granting the extra year of eligibility was almost a given. The NCAA has to reach out with a message that if these kids dont feel safe playing this year then it's their prerogative to sit out and not lose a year. This isnt their fault nor should they be penalized.
The eligibility has to be extended to all players and not just those who are sick. Lets say you're playing on a team and on any given week you are missing key players for each game. You lose a lot of games, well tough tittie you dont get to keep your eligibility while the guy that was sick does. That wouldn't fly for an organization that is trying to prove that they arent using players as forced labor to make money. They have an image problem. They HAD to do this.
Which is a sad state if affairs...very sadWe have games being cancelled and schedules around the NCAA are so off even the national championship from this year will be forever seen as diminished. It's a throw away year in that regard. You want to win if playing but if we finish 2-8 it won't hurt Pruitt's job security with the administration at all.
Win today and we are 3-1 with only a bad half at #3 GA. I’m not throwing $h!t awAy!We have games being cancelled and schedules around the NCAA are so off even the national championship from this year will be forever seen as diminished. It's a throw away year in that regard. You want to win if playing but if we finish 2-8 it won't hurt Pruitt's job security with the administration at all.
I think the schedule is the best in the history of football. Every week multiple big games. The playoffs will be better than ever I believe.We have games being cancelled and schedules around the NCAA are so off even the national championship from this year will be forever seen as diminished. It's a throw away year in that regard. You want to win if playing but if we finish 2-8 it won't hurt Pruitt's job security with the administration at all.
Agree.. I used the mulligan term previously, mainly regarding coaches. I doubt any coach that was in 'reasonably good standing' with his employer(s) prior to the season will get fired this year due to a bad season. Not that they can just say the hell with it, but IMO, it gives them a little more leeway to 'experiment', especially in rebuild mode.So many ways to answer this question, and almost all of them agree with you, Preacher. No such thing as a mulligan in college football, this year or any other. In most ways, at least.
So there we go. I'm sure there are another half dozen ways to look at the season, as well, and most of those will be "no mulligans" too.
- Record books: it all counts. Every W, every L, every streak, every record broken. No such thing as a mulligan here.
- Championships (division, conference, national): they'll count. No mulligans.
- Recruiting: the season will affect recruits. No mulligans.
- NFL scouting: it counts. No mulligans.
- Eligibility: nope, doesn't count. Free year for everyone. Here it is, the only place the "mulligan" crowd are actually 100% correct.
- Coaching hires and fires: maybe a bit of a mulligan, in some places for some reasons. But far form uniform. There WILL be coaches fired this year. Maybe just not quite as many as would otherwise happen, particularly at schools where games got postponed/cancelled/lost because of isolating and quarantining.
So, generally speaking, Preacher, you're dead-on right.
Go Vols! Let's make it count!
I agree totally. No cupcake Big12 or PAC12 teams in the playoffs either. I think it is going to be an epic season that will change the future of college football.With 10 SEC games, arguably this is the most serious year of play ever, I know it has made for more intriguing matchups week in and week out. No cupcake games is definitely something I could get used to.