Bama has 3. McElroy has already washed out to Bray's backup that was one of the worst QBs UT has had
in the last 40 years. And McCarron is next, just a matter of time. And of course your team didnt have anything
to do with all those wins, just like UT's team didnt
have anything to do with all those losses your'e pinning on one guy. Keep it up Bammer, if you dont mind being
embarrassed, I dont mind being the one to make you look like a fool.
Kentucky loss to a WR playing QB? Vandy blowout loss? Just a couple more issues that might've led to his firing.
Also, he's the primary reason the culture went to crap...he wasn't an innocent bystander, he was the culprit.
True. But that ignores his no-show in the second half against UF, and complete no-shows against Bama and Vandy, and he wasn't exactly great against MSU. And as I pointed out earlier, UT's defense actually gave them a chance against UGA. UGA's last 4 possessions were 3 & Out, 4 & Out, 3 & Out, and 3 & Out, and they gained a grand total of 17 yards during those 13 plays. So the opportunity was there, but UT's last 3 possessions were Interception, Fumble by Bray, Interception.
But you are absolutely right about the games against USCe and Mizzou. There really isn't any more that Bray could have done in either of those games.
I have followed UT football for better than 30 years and the 3 years that Derek Dooley was the head coach was by far the biggest cluster in program history, IMO.
Granted the program wasn't in elite shape when he took over, but if anything, UT still had name recognition if nothing else, after a great 15 yr run followed by a few years of mediocrity with Fulmer and one year with Kiffin( granted he kept the brand in the limelight if nothing else.)
How does a perennial SEC power house get to the depths Dooley took us?
My question is this...with the current coaching staff and roster, could Dooley return us to prominence, or would he **** this up too?
i have followed ut football for better than 30 years and the 3 years that derek dooley was the head coach was by far the biggest cluster in program history, imo.
Granted the program wasn't in elite shape when he took over, but if anything, ut still had name recognition if nothing else, after a great 15 yr run followed by a few years of mediocrity with fulmer and one year with kiffin( granted he kept the brand in the limelight if nothing else.)
how does a perennial sec power house get to the depths dooley took us?
My question is this...with the current coaching staff and roster, could dooley return us to prominence, or would he **** this up too?
I have followed UT football for better than 30 years and the 3 years that Derek Dooley was the head coach was by far the biggest cluster in program history, IMO.
Granted the program wasn't in elite shape when he took over, but if anything, UT still had name recognition if nothing else, after a great 15 yr run followed by a few years of mediocrity with Fulmer and one year with Kiffin( granted he kept the brand in the limelight if nothing else.)
How does a perennial SEC power house get to the depths Dooley took us?
My question is this...with the current coaching staff and roster, could Dooley return us to prominence, or would he **** this up too?
I probably shouldn't say too much. I still haven't gotten over Bill Battle, but at least we didn't hang on to Dooley as long. CBJ is the man now, and after seeing the way he does his business, I feel we can rest assured that the tradition of UT football is in good hands.
It is truly amazing just how precipitously the program declined under Battle's direction. With Dickey's recruits primarily, he went 31-5 during his first three years and the 1970-71 defenses were absolutely extraordinary, setting records for turnovers caused that still have not been broken.
Alas, the man could not recruit and his record from 1973-76 was 28-17-2. The talent pool declined so rapidly that Johnny issued his famous "The cupboard is bare" comment upon assuming the helm in 1977.
It is truly amazing just how precipitously the program declined under Battle's direction. With Dickey's recruits primarily, he went 31-5 during his first three years and the 1970-71 defenses were absolutely extraordinary, setting records for turnovers caused that still have not been broken.
Alas, the man could not recruit and his record from 1973-76 was 28-17-2. The talent pool declined so rapidly that Johnny issued his famous "The cupboard is bare" comment upon assuming the helm in 1977.
Pert Jenkins was a friend of mine. He played DT at 225. He was a great athlete but.....
Battle wasn't a bad coach, he just refused to recruit. I was on the Fire Bill Battle committee, but he just
charmed us to the point where we were all ready to put him in the White House. By the time they fired him
way too much damage was done.
No, he wasn't a bad coach. In fact, his winning percentage at Tennessee was significantly higher than Coach Majors', but, then again, it took Johnny several years to restock the talent pool. Battle was, however, also the youngest head coach in the country when he was hired to replace Dickey. Perhaps he would have had more success if he assumed the reins with prior experience in that capacity. On the other hand, it is quite possible that his record would have been much worse during the second half of his career if he had not been able to sign Condredge Holloway.
After 47 years of watching Tennessee football, the two great "what if" questions are, in my opinion, the following:
(1) If Dickey had been hired as head coach one year earlier, what would have been the long-term impact of Steven Orr Spurrier utilizing his talents for the University of Tennessee, which he has said that he would have done, had we not still been running the single-wing in 1963?
(2) If Dickey had the sense to stay at Tennessee long-term after rebuilding the program to top-10 status, what would have been his legacy? Personally, I believe that he could have carved out a legacy comparable to Vince Dooleys: 250 career victories, a half-dozen SEC titles and, perhaps, a national title or two. We almost certainly would not have experienced the dark days of the mid-late 1970s and early 1980s, and Dickeys impact would have lessened the severity of Bear Bryants reign of terror in the 1970s.
I think the Condredge / Battle / UT loss to Bama in 76 was the most heartbreaking of any I have ever experienced in my long career of fandom.
If that is the game that Condredge fumbled in the last two minutes, I am sure that he would agree with you. For the young whippersnappers who don't realize just how cyclic the Tennessee-Alabama series has been, here is an interesting bit of trivia:
"For Alabama the woes of the program's nadir in the 1950s was exemplified by the run of futility against the Volunteers. Between 1940 and 1960 the Crimson Tide eked out a meagre 1-9-2 record against Tennessee. Exempting a 27-0 victory in Knoxville in 1954, Alabama was outscored by the Volunteers 188-56 over that span" (Alabama vs Tennessee: A Historical Retrospective - Roll 'Bama Roll).