golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,414
- Likes
- 57,672
If we win and Duke loses, we’ll be 30-4. They’ll be 28-6. Should be a no-brainer, but I see your point.I could be wrong, but it looks like they “want” to give Duke a 1..... if I am right we prob need Duke to win. I just want to see more space between Duke and UNC. Duke won a very close one if they drop one tomorrow they put no gap on UNC..... I don’t want to see Virg, Duke, and UNC getting a one...... then you could have Tennessee, Gonzaga and Mich ST trying for the last one.
Sure I think Tennessee should get it and they prob would...... but if there were 2 spots up for grabs I would feel more confident the committee would give prob the 3rd one to Tennessee...... just my opinion.
Thank God this loon isn't a Selection Committee Member! His saying UT and Sparty should be both considered for No. 1 seeds has him losing all credibility. Sparty lost to Indiana twice and Illinois once. Give me a break!Joe Lunardi is nuts! He had Kentucky as solid one seed and Tennessee a #2. VOLS win and no #1 seed...even after we already defeated Kentucky twice plus Gonzaga. Give me a break!!
I dont see regardless of quality wins how Michigan St with their bad losses can be considered for a 1 seed. My biggest complaint though will be if we win tomorrow and ACC gets 3 #1s and if we get 1 out west or any variety of 2.If we win tomorrow and Michigan wins it is a lock IMO.
If that specific sequence does not occur, who knows what the committee does.