Homelessness Causes and Solutions

Is it more humane to force homeless people into mental health facilities?

  • Yes for those incapable of caring for themselves

    Votes: 10 71.4%
  • In favor of status quo: only use force if they’re a threat to themselves or others

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • No, it’s never acceptable

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    14
#76
#76
So they would be better off with less help?
We aren't on same page.
The issue isn't about access to help. It is about compliance with treatment protocols after they have received help. Once they feel better and are of 'sound mind' they cannot be forced to take meds, get counseling, etc. Even family members have a challenging time keeping the mentally ill on their meds. Help is there. Help cannot be forced.
 
#77
#77
But if families were a thing, housing would still be unaffordable. You're just dodging the point that the root of the problem is bad monetary policy since Obama. Saying theres no problem and that people should suffer more or that you dont care about other people's problems doesnt really address the issue.

Not if you understand supply and demand. More demand (smaller households) drives prices up. Homelessness is not primarily driven by housing cost nor inflation, but rather mental illness and drug abuse (often both).

People with chronic mental illness should be in a place that treats those problems.

You lose me here. First you say they should be “in a place that treats those problems” (I’m assuming that means in patient care)

Many can function on their own and just suffer periodic episodes that require treatment when they face certain stresses. Perhaps as portrayed in a beautiful.mind.

But then you say they can function on their own.

I can’t proclaim everyone needs confinement, but many of the homeless do.
 
#79
#79
Not if you understand supply and demand. More demand (smaller households) drives prices up. Homelessness is not primarily driven by housing cost nor inflation, but rather mental illness and drug abuse (often both).



You lose me here. First you say they should be “in a place that treats those problems” (I’m assuming that means in patient care)



But then you say they can function on their own.

I can’t proclaim everyone needs confinement, but many of the homeless do.
People are homeless at this particular moment because housing has become unaffordable for some people even when they have a job. The push for smaller homes has more to with affordability than that just one person wants to live there. Plenty of tiny homes are also family homes.

For those with mental illness that cant be treated, they should receive hospitalization or confinement. Most with mental illness suffer periods of heavy symptoms, call it mania or delusion, but then return to normalish with treatment. Periods of mania will be increased by the stresses of homelessnessness, so it improves their chance of success if they receive supportive housing.
 
#80
#80
People are homeless at this particular moment because housing has become unaffordable for some people even when they have a job. The push for smaller homes has more to with affordability than that just one person wants to live there. Plenty of tiny homes are also family homes.

For those with mental illness that cant be treated, they should receive hospitalization or confinement. Most with mental illness suffer periods of heavy symptoms, call it mania or delusion, but then return to normalish with treatment. Periods of mania will be increased by the stresses of homelessnessness, so it improves their chance of success if they receive supportive housing.
the issue is the efforts you are pushing are only going to further increase those costs. either directly or indirectly thru inflationary spending.

all you are doing is making the edge cases the next income level up.

  • Regulations imposed by all levels of government account for $93,870, or about 24% of the current average sales price ($397,300) of a new single-family home, according to a new study by the National Association of Home Builders. This amount marks a 10.9% increase over the past five years.
and a single family home has less regulations than pretty much any other form of construction. apartments its close to 40% of construction costs.

and the cost of the materials themselves, which this article lists as a separate cost increase, face similar regulatory pressure on prices. so its a compounding issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#81
#81
People are homeless at this particular moment because housing has become unaffordable for some people even when they have a job. The push for smaller homes has more to with affordability than that just one person wants to live there. Plenty of tiny homes are also family homes.

That’s just not reality. People unable to afford housing on one income can always live with friends or family. Unless they’re shooting up in the bathroom, or up all night talking to the television static.

For those with mental illness that cant be treated, they should receive hospitalization or confinement. Most with mental illness suffer periods of heavy symptoms, call it mania or delusion, but then return to normalish with treatment. Periods of mania will be increased by the stresses of homelessnessness, so it improves their chance of success if they receive supportive housing.

I think you’re missing the aspect of choice here. Meaning many do not want to be treated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#83
#83
Of course they are better off in mental health facilities. How is that even debatable?

I’m assuming you support Trump’s new EO since it forces people into mental health facilities?


 
#84
#84
That’s just not reality. People unable to afford housing on one income can always live with friends or family. Unless they’re shooting up in the bathroom, or up all night talking to the television static.



I think you’re missing the aspect of choice here. Meaning many do not want to be treated.
This country ****ed up in the 1980s. The middle class shrunk substantially. Homelessness has grown almost exponentially since the 1980s for lots of reasons, but the deregulation that favored high finance set us back economically. The cuts at the SEC led to MBS fraud and ultimately an astronomical hit
 
#85
#85
This country ****ed up in the 1980s. The middle class shrunk substantially. Homelessness has grown almost exponentially since the 1980s for lots of reasons, but the deregulation that favored high finance set us back economically. The cuts at the SEC led to MBS fraud and ultimately an astronomical hit

Our country has only improved economically since the 1980s. Not sure what you’re talking about exactly
 
#86
#86
Our country has only improved economically since the 1980s. Not sure what you’re talking about exactly
Growth wise, yes. Unfortunately, the wealthy class has made significant gains, but the middle-class has contracted. The middle class was the driver of our economy up until 40 years ago, with insignificant debt and defecit in that practicing model. Now the debt and deficit are out of control. We can't continue to cater to the wealthy elites. We are a tiny speck in time. Much of the negative discourse in this country has been triggered by the fact much of our populace doesn't think about 100 years down the road
 
#87
#87
Growth wise, yes. Unfortunately, the wealthy class has made significant gains, but the middle-class has contracted. The middle class was the driver of our economy up until 40 years ago, with insignificant debt and defecit in that practicing model. Now the debt and deficit are out of control. We can't continue to cater to the wealthy elites. We are a tiny speck in time. Much of the negative discourse in this country has been triggered by the fact much of our populace doesn't think about 100 years down the road

All income levels are significantly better off today than 1980. Still not certain exactly what you’re talking about.

Also not sure how any of this relates to the debt or deficit.
 
#88
#88
That’s just not reality. People unable to afford housing on one income can always live with friends or family. Unless they’re shooting up in the bathroom, or up all night talking to the television static.



I think you’re missing the aspect of choice here. Meaning many do not want to be treated.
Reality is that people not in the upper middle class dont have friends and family with a secure living situation to share. And the middle class with home ownership is only going to be shrinking with homes as unaffordable as they are now.

Not wanting treatment isn't a reason to not support homeless people. Theres a lot of leading the horse to water in medicine. Sometimes you have to do your best to look out for people when they wont look out for themselves.
 
#89
#89
the issue is the efforts you are pushing are only going to further increase those costs. either directly or indirectly thru inflationary spending.

all you are doing is making the edge cases the next income level up.

  • Regulations imposed by all levels of government account for $93,870, or about 24% of the current average sales price ($397,300) of a new single-family home, according to a new study by the National Association of Home Builders. This amount marks a 10.9% increase over the past five years.
and a single family home has less regulations than pretty much any other form of construction. apartments its close to 40% of construction costs.

and the cost of the materials themselves, which this article lists as a separate cost increase, face similar regulatory pressure on prices. so its a compounding issue.
I've recommended a solution that increases regulation?
 
#90
#90
Reality is that people not in the upper middle class dont have friends and family with a secure living situation to share. And the middle class with home ownership is only going to be shrinking with homes as unaffordable as they are now.

This just isn’t reality. The idea that middle class don’t have family or friends?

Do you have any data to back up any of these absurd claims like the idea that homeless people are not primarily drug addicts and severely mentally ill?

Not wanting treatment isn't a reason to not support homeless people. Theres a lot of leading the horse to water in medicine. Sometimes you have to do your best to look out for people when they wont look out for themselves.

You’re fighting windmills. No one has opposed supporting homeless people.
 
#91
#91
I have always thought Heroin was the worst drug for addiction which destroyed a person's life. I think of cocaine as a more of a party drug.

Are there other drugs as bad as heroin for putting people on the street and into a desperate situation?

Heroin ruins lives of the user and those connected to them, but one can still be a high functioning addict with it. Same goes for cocaine. Quitting heroin is considerably more difficult in the long term as coke is more of a lifestyle addiction, intertwined with status and social interaction. Heroin is a routine, and a part of you.

Neither can hold a candle to crack and meth, imo. That sh*t turns you into something between a hollow human and a rabid zombie. It strips away a person's humanity.

Those two tie for your trophy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#92
#92
I've recommended a solution that increases regulation?
you want the government involved don't you? I believe it was providing housing, and help for the mentally ill. that isn't free, and our government is out of money before its even done paying the military. everything after them is deficit spending.
 
#93
#93
We aren't on same page.
The issue isn't about access to help. It is about compliance with treatment protocols after they have received help. Once they feel better and are of 'sound mind' they cannot be forced to take meds, get counseling, etc. Even family members have a challenging time keeping the mentally ill on their meds. Help is there. Help cannot be forced.
I agree with this completely. I've known a couple of people with issues. One guy I knew all my life, played little league ball with him. He struggled on and off for years.

About two weeks before his death he started posting videos in front of electrical devices documenting what the CIA parked right up the street was targeting him with.

I reached out to him and spoke with him over the phone a couple of times that week. I called his older brother and he had seen it as well but he'd been cut off by his brother and police were unable to do anything.

About a week later he ended up traveling from Antioch to the general area his brother lived near Monteagle. Had a gun and ended up on foot in the woods with a gun. He was killed by officers there.

It's a difficult issue, he had been on and off meds for years. Always stopped taking his meds started drinking and taking pills. When he was in managed facilities he was fine. When he wasn't he always fell back into his psychosis.

I think there should be two main types of facilities. One for repeat criminal offenders who are a danger to society without constant supervision, they would allow little to no contact with the outside world. And others where jobs can be held and people go to work but live in managed communities with varying degrees of self management based on their abilities/prognosis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#94
#94
To solve homelessness we need more homes. I bet if the government built thousands of government homes that would solve the problem. I bet the homes would be well taken care of and remain in good condition since the folks in them would be so appreciative to have somewhere to stay.

Am I missing anything?
 
#95
#95
To solve homelessness we need more homes. I bet if the government built thousands of government homes that would solve the problem. I bet the homes would be well taken care of and remain in good condition since the folks in them would be so appreciative to have somewhere to stay.

Am I missing anything?
Yes. More than you know.
 

VN Store



Back
Top