Because spur of the moment decisions quite often lead to poor decisions. I don't know how to say this any more clear, me naming coaches on a message board is irrelevant to the question can UT reach higher than Dooley. UT is one of the greatest football programs in the history of college football. To think DD is the best when can do is just not accurate.
This isn't even the argument, and has nothing to do with anyones attitude about Dooley.
The question was posed about Kippy being interim coach vs Dooley getting hired. AV said he would have had Kippy as interim, then hire a big name coach, yet he can't name a single one.
Asking for names of big name coaches that UT could hire is an answer that noone has given after repeatedly questioned. This topic actually has nothing to do with anyone's attitude toward Dooley. Don't even consider Dooley. Who is the "big name" coach? Simple question.
Sorry guys, but any interim head coach option, when that interim would be the third head coach I three years, would have been a really bad idea. The recruits you're trying to keep wouldn't know who their coach would be. If you think it hurt things having three head coaches in three years, imagine having four infouryears.
No. It was either hire Kippy as the real (not interim) head coach, or hire Dooley. At least Hamilton knew better than to go with an interim at that point.
But according to you, completely accurate.
So with your reasoning, if you can't explain something then your opinion must be right??
Face it. You can't name one viable option so the easy thing to do is to hate on DD.. Like i said before, let him ride out his 3 years and if he doesn't get it done then he will be gone. But we will still be much better off than before.