n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 91,632
- Likes
- 55,773
The top ten states listed here are extremely close to the top ten states in total population. With a few exceptions, the entire list fairly well matches up. But it is pretty apparent that it is a numbers game based on population.
The answer is much simpler. In the days of Johnny Majors most of the talent was going to 10 schools. Now with the rise of so many other programs and scholarship reductions there is much more parody in college football. The reason TN, as a state, lags behind in D1 talent is simply because of the amount of African Americans in our state. East Tn is probably the whitest part of the entire world. The states that produce the most talent also have a much broader pool of athletes to pull from....its a simple as that.:hi:
I can see burning them out being a problem and I can also see them learning bad habits.
That said, them sitting inside playing video games is just as bad.
One thing Johnny Majors did a lot of was recruit track athletes and teach them to catch a football or run down a receiver and tackle him.
Maybe if we aren't promoting football itself, it should be track or something like that.
The point is, Tennessee is lacking recruits in state. There's got to be things other states are doing that Tennessee isn't. Tennessee is a larger state population wise than Alabama and Mississippi put together yet both have more athletes available.
I'm not buying into the race theory. There's an even enough mix throughout Tennessee and good players come in all colors.
Look in the NFL, what is the black/white ratio? I would say 75-80% black easy. How about the NBA? The total population of the US would show a ratio that is the exact opposite of that. More like 75-80% white. The numbers don't lie. African Americans are (generally speaking) better athletes. Also you can compare the demographics of these states with the number of NFL players produced. Example. Mississippi produces more NFL players than just about anyone per capita. They also have (just about) the highest minority population per capita in the US. They also have a very low population.
I posted this before, but Tennessee has 1.05 million blacks. Alabama has 1.1 million blacks. The state of Tennessee has produced 16 4-star players in 3 years. Alabama has produced 38. I don't think it's about physical talent, I think it's about the HS sports scene.
I'm not trying to say that TN is where it needs to be with its feeder programs and HS football programs. I can assure you it is atrocious. Heck, half of these kids are being coached by people who have no idea what there talking about. I would like to see what Maryville's feeder programs and HS coaches/facilities could do with Memphis talent.
I'm not trying to say that TN is where it needs to be with its feeder programs and HS football programs. I can assure you it is atrocious. Heck, half of these kids are being coached by people who have no idea what there talking about. I would like to see what Maryville's feeder programs and HS coaches/facilities could do with Memphis talent.
My answer would be top 5 in the nation.
would probably be a carbon copy of what you see at Duncan Byrnes, SC and North Miami, FL. I'm telling you, if memphis would get some better coaching and player development programs for its public schools, memphis would play second fiddle to noone in the south as far as producing talent. I've played against them, and one things for sure, they're fast, every one of the memphis schools is tremendously fast. unfortunately, thats about where it ends. and it will stay that way unless something changes. But still, it also wouldn't hurt if UT could simply learn how to recruit in memphis regardless. There's no telling how many memphians have slipped through the cracks. and it's not just to ole miss like everyone thinks it is simply because of the closer proximity, it's the florida's, the georgia's, the georgia tech's, and the bama's. Ut's gotta get ahold of that region somehow, nobody else seems to have trouble doing it.
Big difference in the mindset of the average kid in Maryville and the average kid in Memphis. BIG difference.
That's very true! I'm a West Tennessean , and the programs we have here could be very good, IF, they wouldn't always hire the good ole boys that have played at the HS or live within the county. I think a lot of schools are afraid to go out and hire a good coaching staff. There really isn't a football powerhouse in west tennessee. We have great athletes, and I think if the schools around here wanted to become a place that would produce SEC talent, they could. We need to take a page out of the state of Texas's book, and make our sports programs more important to the kids, and the community.
Look in the NFL, what is the black/white ratio? I would say 75-80% black easy. How about the NBA? The total population of the US would show a ratio that is the exact opposite of that. More like 75-80% white. The numbers don't lie. African Americans are (generally speaking) better athletes.
According to the 2000 census TN had 932,809, Al had 1,155,930, Florida had 2,335,505, MS had 1,033,809, and GA had 2,349,542.
Ya know, it's really disheartening, to see that the school who put the first black QB in the SEC on the field as a starter, Condredge Holloway (one of my all time heroes), to continuously read some of our Volunteer fans unable to view players without the constant prism of race. This discussion simply does not happen in other places and parts of the country. Players are human beings, with two arms and two legs and their racial heritage has not squat to do with their ability on the field. If you, your child, or beloved family member had their lives depending on receiving blood or an organ donation from someone of another race, you'd be able to determine rather quickly how utterly small race is in the human condition.
My friend, you are living in denial about a lot of stuff. To imply that discussions about race don't exist outside of the South is ludicrous. The descendants of Blacks who migrated to the Western World hundreds of years ago (for whatever reason) are, as a group, SIGNIFICANTLY more athletic than their distant relatives from their native continent...as well as their White counterparts, as a group.
Now, we all know that there are exceptions in both directions for all races. But the facts and the truth are never offensive, when viewed objectively and from an emotionless perspective.
Here's an example. We have no issue with admitting or acknowledging that one breed of dog is different from another. A Border Collie is athletic and smart, but you never see them in a dog race. It's always a Greyhound or a Whippet. The Greyhound and Whippet are just faster breeds of dog. Now, the will the world's fastest Border Collie beat the world's slowest Greyhound in a race. Of course. But, as a breed of dog, the Greyhound is faster. Both breeds are unmistakably dogs. They share the same basic traits and have essentially the same internal anatomical and physiological structures. Is it bigoted or racist to openly admit that the Greyhound has inherent traits and the Border Collie has inherent traits that make them both specialized?
Nothing makes sphincters tighten quicker than honest talks about the differences in races.