Hey jumpers...

#53
#53
Mark Stoops inherited a worse situation than Jones and he is going to have UK bowling in year 2 while we sit at home for Christmas. Again.

Where exactly is that 6th win coming from...der....but da sun got far wins, I caint read no time roster and sees who they goats to play derrrrrrp.

BTW UK will finish 5-7. Not bowl eligible. They play uga mizz ut miss st Louisville and LSU. Not Ohio candy and utm like they already have. But yes facts aside, your thought process holds up...
 
#54
#54
Now post under this who each team has played genius. So are you saying UK is better than LSU, and on par with Obama, tamu, ga, and the like? Who a team plays matters...you posting the rankings isn't proof of jack. We have one mutual opponent, and it was the same result. Smh.

"Please explain how Kentucky is ranked ahead of us"

You had it explained to you and now you don't like the answer.

Where you get I am saying Kentucky is on par with Bama, LSU or anyone else is a stretch. We were comparing KENTUCKY and TENNESSEE.

Guys like yourself get made out to be fools on here then have to change the argument when your half-baked statements get turned on you.

Strength of schedule is pretty far down the list of tie breakers so that argument is pointless. At the end of the day, it's about wins and it's about losses.

Right now, Kentucky has a leg up on the Vols and you can't or won't accept that. Moral victories can only take a team so far.
 
#55
#55
Where exactly is that 6th win coming from...der....but da sun got far wins, I caint read no time roster and sees who they goats to play derrrrrrp.

BTW UK will finish 5-7. Not bowl eligible. They play uga mizz ut miss st Louisville and LSU. Not Ohio candy and utm like they already have. But yes facts aside, your thought process holds up...

They will beat UL-Monroe and UT. I could see them beating Louisville too.
 
#56
#56
Where exactly is that 6th win coming from...der....but da sun got far wins, I caint read no time roster and sees who they goats to play derrrrrrp.

BTW UK will finish 5-7. Not bowl eligible. They play uga mizz ut miss st Louisville and LSU. Not Ohio candy and utm like they already have. But yes facts aside, your thought process holds up...

How are the results of games that haven't even been played "facts"?

It's rhetorical. I'll go ahead and answer for you since you'll ignore this just like when I questioned you on putting a number on this rebuilding "process".

They aren't facts.

You are just speculating along with everyone else on here and you throw out the same tired catch phrases and coach speak you hear on Vol Calls to try to make yourself feel smarter.

...
 
#57
#57
"Please explain how Kentucky is ranked ahead of us"

You had it explained to you and now you don't like the answer.

Where you get I am saying Kentucky is on par with Bama, LSU or anyone else is a stretch. We were comparing KENTUCKY and TENNESSEE.

Guys like yourself get made out to be fools on here then have to change the argument when your half-baked statements get turned on you.

Strength of schedule is pretty far down the list of tie breakers so that argument is pointless. At the end of the day, it's about wins and it's about losses.

Right now, Kentucky has a leg up on the Vols and you can't or won't accept that. Moral victories can only take a team so far.

what argument have i changed? You bring up UK being better than UT, and I pointed out that they have played Ohio, UTM, and Candy. We have played OU, GA, and Utah St. Big difference there moron. I am not being made out to be a fool, because I am not the one that is saying that who a team has played so far doesn't matter. ... That is just plain and simply stupid. If SOS is sooooo far down your list, what is ahead of it.... please enlighten us all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#58
#58
They will beat UL-Monroe and UT. I could see them beating Louisville too.

I see UL-Monroe, but not Louisville and UT. I think that people are freaking out too much about one bad game. I mean seriously, would the team that showed up against Utah St, Ark St, OK, and GA be beat by UK? No. Too much credit is given to UK for beating Ohio, UTM, and Candy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#59
#59
How are the results of games that haven't even been played "facts"?

It's rhetorical. I'll go ahead and answer for you since you'll ignore this just like when I questioned you on putting a number on this rebuilding "process".

They aren't facts.

You are just speculating along with everyone else on here and you throw out the same tired catch phrases and coach speak you hear on Vol Calls to try to make yourself feel smarter.

... You come on here and say that "SOS is way down the list on what matters," yet all you can say is wins matter. And when i tell you that the wins wont be there when they actually play good competition, you automatically throw out there that future games cant be taken into consideration. Which is it ...?

Here is the bottom line. We played one bad game, and your panties have bunched so far up your ass that you think UK can beat us. That is a prime example of what a POS fan is. People like you that freak out this much after a ONE BAD GAME make me sick. Sit down, STFU, and please keep your head up your ass, and maybe we won't have to hear from you anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#60
#60
How are the results of games that haven't even been played "facts"?

It's rhetorical. I'll go ahead and answer for you since you'll ignore this just like when I questioned you on putting a number on this rebuilding "process".

They aren't facts.

You are just speculating along with everyone else on here and you throw out the same tired catch phrases and coach speak you hear on Vol Calls to try to make yourself feel smarter.

"They play uga mizz ut miss st Louisville and LSU. Not Ohio candy and utm like they already have. But yes facts aside"...

how is listing their schedule not a fact. can their schedule change at this point? Im pretty sure that it can't. So, yes. Their schedule is not speculation. They have played lesser opponents so far. They are playing harder ones later. ...
 
#61
#61
OK, what play calling with balls would you have done genius? Your qb has less than 1.5 seconds on average in the pocket...and go. Freak in idiot, fahr butch.
dear lord I never said fahr butch...or fahr anyone..good try though.I guess the professional analysis that said they was also shocked we didn't run any reverses trick plays etc and the play calling was vanilla are idiots too?
 
#62
#62
So we lose a game that we should have won, and your answer is to pick up your ball and go home. Piss piss moan moan tear tear fahr butch...I don't know bout y'all but I love my vawls, my daddy and granddaddy loved these vawls. We gotta hit rid of rich...sorry butch. Piss piss moan moan fahr butch.
dude lay off the drugs...if this staff is really wanting a bowl game they had a great opportunity to take a step closer Saturday...hell let's run devron young twice for nice gains and then never do it again...its amazing at the coach man crush some have and can't admit we could have done more.Butch can say what ever he wants he's the man in charge .the product on the field Saturday was better in every aspect other than play calling.go back and watch the game...we did nothing in the play calling after half time to help these young men be successful..
 
Last edited:
#63
#63
Stay classy, San Diego.

Believe it or not other fans including recruits check out this site. I look at other school's sites to see what they are saying. Vent a little if you need to. Tape it. Ice it. Get ready for the next game. Know that Tennessee is coming and on the rise. It will not be a smooth road, but progress is already there and it will be in the future led by 16-17 year olds who are watching and listening and reading now. I hope they see passion and loyalty and not crazy. Leave the coaches to do what needs to be done. Despite the vocal frustration fever pitched by a bitter 1 point loss to UF, we are well ahead of last year in talent and hustle. Wins will come with better execution from the youngest program in the country.
 
#64
#64
He also didn't recruit one for two years...we have young players playing out of position. Fahr butch. Could you do better? No. Are you so dense you don't understand that it does take time for players to learn new positions...when they are FRESHMEN AND FIRST YEAR STARTERS? Of course you don't. You probably played 2 years of varsity ball in HS.

I think you mean little league.
 
#65
#65
dude lay off the drugs...if this staff is really wanting a bowl game they had a great opportunity to take a step closer Saturday...hell let's run devron young twice for nice gains and then never do it again...its amazing at the coach man crush some have and can't admit we could have done more.Butch can say what ever he wants he's the man in charge .the product on the field Saturday was better in every aspect other than play calling.go back and watch the game...we did nothing in the play calling after half time to help these young men be successful..

What would you attribute the product on the field being better to?
 
#66
#66
Another I'm a better fan thread. Another dumb one. Dooley hasn't coached these guys in 2 seasons. Excuse makers are out in force.

To be fair 2 of the OL hasnt been. We need to remember 6 of their major offensive contributors are new. GREEN. Its no surprise they suck. We overhyped this offense because of how far ahead of themselves they were in playing discipline football and playing OU and UGA tough. No need to bail after 1 game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#67
#67
what argument have i changed? You bring up UK being better than UT, and I pointed out that they have played Ohio, UTM, and Candy. We have played OU, GA, and Utah St. Big difference there moron. I am not being made out to be a fool, because I am not the one that is saying that who a team has played so far doesn't matter. ... That is just plain and simply stupid. If SOS is sooooo far down your list, what is ahead of it.... please enlighten us all.

It's not "my" list you moron. It is the standings as they are heading into week 7 of the college football season.

But please, continue opening your mouth and removing all doubt as to your stupidity.

Whenever Slive decides to start setting the SEC championship game based on strength of schedule instead of wins and losses, get back to me.

By your reasoning, the Vols should have been in the title game at 5-7 last season.

The National Title game should have been Purdue and UT. After all, those two ended up with the toughest schedules according to the NCAA.

Not sure which world you live in but wins and losses count for more than your opinion to the powers that be.
 
#68
#68
M0bzoF7.gif
 
#69
#69
... You come on here and say that "SOS is way down the list on what matters," yet all you can say is wins matter. And when i tell you that the wins wont be there when they actually play good competition, you automatically throw out there that future games cant be taken into consideration. Which is it ...?

Here is the bottom line. We played one bad game, and your panties have bunched so far up your ass that you think UK can beat us. That is a prime example of what a POS fan is. People like you that freak out this much after a ONE BAD GAME make me sick. Sit down, STFU, and please keep your head up your ass, and maybe we won't have to hear from you anymore.

You're the one who already cemented the Wildcats schedule. No one has any idea how the rest of the season will play out for them or anyone else.

"BTW UK will finish 5-7. Not bowl eligible. "

Your words not mine.

I'd like to give you the benefit of doubt that you are actually just trolling but I really think you are as stupid as you come across.

Now, GFY and get back to the trailer, you're creeping out the librarian and other people want to use the internet as well.

That meth ain't gonna cook itself.
 
#70
#70
It's not "my" list you moron. It is the standings as they are heading into week 7 of the college football season.

But please, continue opening your mouth and removing all doubt as to your stupidity.

Whenever Slive decides to start setting the SEC championship game based on strength of schedule instead of wins and losses, get back to me.

By your reasoning, the Vols should have been in the title game at 5-7 last season.

The National Title game should have been Purdue and UT. After all, those two ended up with the toughest schedules according to the NCAA.

Not sure which world you live in but wins and losses count for more than your opinion to the powers that be.

I'm going to try this one last time... if you have trouble with it, find an adult to read it to you...

YOU, are the person that said UK was better than UT based on their record.

I said that is crap, because of who the two teams have played. There is no way you can say that when UK has played a far weaker schedule so far.

I said we will have a better representation of who is better once both teams play SEC opponents.

Are you arguing that this logic is moronic? If so, you are the biggest *blam* on this board.

I repeatedly ask you to back up your points and the best you can do is well UK has won more games...der der der.

Answer these questions please...

Is UK better than LSU?
Is UK as good as UGA, BAMA, LSU, and TAMU?

Just a reminder you have to answer yes to both of these questions for your argument that UK is better than UT to be valid.

So, what's it going to be troll?
 
Last edited:
#71
#71
I'm going to try this one last time... if you have trouble with it, find an adult to read it to you...

YOU, are the person that said UK was better than UT based on their record.

I said that is crap, because of who the two teams have played. There is no way you can say that when UK has played a far weaker schedule so far.

I said we will have a better representation of who is better once both teams play SEC opponents.

Are you arguing that this logic is moronic? If so, you are the biggest dumbass on this board.

I repeatedly ask you to back up your points and the best you can do is well UK has won more games...der der der.

Answer these questions please...

Is UK better than LSU?
Is UK as good as UGA, BAMA, LSU, and TAMU?

Just a reminder you have to answer yes to both of these questions for your argument that UK is better than UT to be valid.

So, what's it going to be troll?

You have some serious...serious problems.

Whether from drug abuse, not enough of a nurturing environment as a child, genetics, or just plain stupidity, I don't know and don't care.

I don't "have to" answer anything for you because... right now... on Mon Oct 6, KY is better than UT in the only place that matters at the end of the day....THE STANDINGS.

Whether that holds up through the end of the season, no one, not even you with your guarantees and facts, knows.

Again, the meth ain't cooking itself. Git too it.
 
#72
#72
You have some serious...serious problems.

Whether from drug abuse, not enough of a nurturing environment as a child, genetics, or just plain stupidity, I don't know and don't care.

I don't "have to" answer anything for you because... right now... on Mon Oct 6, KY is better than UT in the only place that matters at the end of the day....THE STANDINGS.

Whether that holds up through the end of the season, no one, not even you with your guarantees and facts, knows.

Again, the meth ain't cooking itself. Git too it.

Spoken like someone who can't argue their own side. Yes, UK is ahead of UT in the standings. However, your argument was that UK is better because of that. You refuse to answer two simple questions because you know that it makes you look even more incorrect. If you stood by your flawed logic those questions should have been easy to answer. Ad I thought, nothing but an irrational troll.

Sincerely,

WW
 
#73
#73
Spoken like someone who can't argue their own side. Yes, UK is ahead of UT in the standings. However, your argument was that UK is better because of that. You refuse to answer two simple questions because you know that it makes you look even more incorrect. If you stood by your flawed logic those questions should have been easy to answer. Ad I thought, nothing but an irrational troll.

Sincerely,

WW

THERE

WAS

NO

ARGUMENT.

You asked where KY was better than UT, the answer is real simple. It's in the standings. That's irrefutable right now.

The dumbest fan base comments from all the media sources around the country are obviously coming from interactions with you.

This discussion is over. Go see if you can find some unlocked cars at Wal Mart to break into.
 
#74
#74
Spoken like someone who can't argue their own side. Yes, UK is ahead of UT in the standings. However, your argument was that UK is better because of that. You refuse to answer two simple questions because you know that it makes you look even more incorrect. If you stood by your flawed logic those questions should have been easy to answer. Ad I thought, nothing but an irrational troll.

Sincerely,

WW

FTR, you are so slow, you can't even go back and see who you were actually arguing with at the beginning of this stupid attention grabbing thread.

Congratulations, you caught me at a moment of being testy as hell over this loss.

I'll be sure not to waste another key stroke over you though buddy.
 
#75
#75
FTR, you are so slow, you can't even go back and see who you were actually arguing with at the beginning of this stupid attention grabbing thread.

Congratulations, you caught me at a moment of being testy as hell over this loss.

I'll be sure not to waste another key stroke over you though buddy.

Awesome, BTW I would never ask "where" UK is better than UT. I would ask how. I asked the same individual how he thought Ur was worse than UK, you are the fool that ran with it. Maybe you should just shut your sassy butt up from time to time.

Face it, your logic was lacking and you were just wanting to vent after a tough loss. Seriously though, your posts contain no content, and always end with a method reference. Sad.

Sincerely,

WW
 
Advertisement





Back
Top