Hey Griff!

#1
V

VolBeef88

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
12,262
Likes
3
#1
I want to be fair to you and make sure you see the questions I asked so that way if you don't answer I know you chose to ignore them. I surely don't want to wrongly accuse someone of something they are not guilty of. So here are my questions for you.

1. Would UT's defense have taken a step back this year compared to last years no matter who was DC?

2. Does Chavis have more talent, less talent or equal talent at LSU than Monte has at UT?

3. What's your take on Monte's success against the option and in general while DC at Arkansas?

Thank you in advace for you opinions and I will try and keep this bumped to the top so you can have a fair shot at seeing and answering.
 
#6
#6
doozer said:
if i don't answer, will you start a new thread about it?

no bump needed. it was already at the top.
Click to expand...

When you're a jounalist you will be treated accordingly. I asked a question stemming from his topic on his blog. Simple really.

Again, thanks for the bump.
 
#9
#9
VolBeef88 said:
When you're a jounalist you will be treated accordingly. I asked a question stemming from his topic on his blog. Simple really.

Again, thanks for the bump.
Click to expand...

How will you treat me if I've been naughty?
 
#10
#10
JZVOL said:
How will you treat me if I've been naughty?
Click to expand...


I don't care what most do on this site. Griff is a journalist and has made statements that lead to these questions that he has yet to answer. They are relevant questions and should not be hard for him to answer. Really simple.
 
#11
#11
VolBeef88 said:
I don't care what most do on this site. Griff is a journalist and has made statements that lead to these questions that he has yet to answer. They are relevant questions and should not be hard for him to answer. Really simple.
Click to expand...

Why so serious?
 
#14
#14
Subscribed.

Its a fair request and it was done in a reasonable manner. Griff is a member of this board like the rest of us, and given his job, should have something meaningful to contribute.

I'd much prefer to see this discussion than another rehash of Kiffin's 6 meaningless secondary violations.
 
#17
#17
JZVOL said:
Why so serious?
Click to expand...

I dont know if this is what Vol Beef's Beef is but I feel serious about it as well. When I lived in Charleston all the local papers had Koolaid editorials of the ACC, USC lite, and Clemson but in Knoxville it is the opposite at times. I am tired of fans of other teams writing in our papers. When I pick up the paper in Knoxville or read it online I want at a minimum a fair report on UT football and koolaid filled editorials are fine.

I do not want anymore articles that are based on bias or perhaps are trying get people upset just for readership. Griff has been writing articles not based on facts that are anti-Kiffin thus anti-UT at this junction. If had some reason like losed etc it would be different but at this point we have had nothing but positives.
 
#20
#20
The bottom line out of Knoxville is that when Monte speaks everybody...even the old timers shut up and listen.

At the risk of taking heat from others on the board, I think that Chavis carried water for Fulmer and Cutcliffe. He helped keep Fulmer employed for a long time, and Fulmer knew it. He was and is a good defensive coordinator, but for the love of God, he is no Monte Kiffin.
 
#21
#21
VolBeef88 said:
I don't care what most do on this site. Griff is a journalist and has made statements that lead to these questions that he has yet to answer. They are relevant questions and should not be hard for him to answer. Really simple.
Click to expand...

I changed my mind on that point earlier today.
 
#22
#22
Lexvol said:
At the risk of taking heat from others on the board, I think that Chavis carried water for Fulmer and Cutcliffe. He helped keep Fulmer employed for a long time, and Fulmer knew it. He was and is a good defensive coordinator, but for the love of God, he is no Monte Kiffin.
Click to expand...

Hard to argue with any of that. And too bad for Fulmer that Cutcliffe didn't have similar career aspirations as Chavis, he might still be employed.
 
#23
#23
Lexvol said:
The bottom line out of Knoxville is that when Monte speaks everybody...even the old timers shut up and listen.

At the risk of taking heat from others on the board, I think that Chavis carried water for Fulmer and Cutcliffe. He helped keep Fulmer employed for a long time, and Fulmer knew it. He was and is a good defensive coordinator, but for the love of God, he is no Monte Kiffin.
Click to expand...

could not have said it better myself.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top