ButchPlz
We do a little trollin'
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
- Messages
- 21,237
- Likes
- 42,229
I said 10 millionHow is that different than any other coaching hire from any other program? All hires are basically a hit or miss.
And who is a $10 million dollar coach that would accept the job that would meet your criteria?
Could this be where Steele comes into play? I found it odd they hired him as an assistant to a lucrative contract possibly knowing that they were gonna fire JP. Steele was never gonna be HC but his defenses have always performed decently in the SEC. He has that experience that can complement JH. Football has changed, Defenses are not expected to always hold offenses out of the endzone but more or less have a couple of takeaways and stops that give the offense a few more possessions. This is just my opinion but it would make sense that the JH could be contingent on him keeping Steele on as DC until the ship is righted. If this is the case and given that Steele was on the market it would have been a smart move to get him under a contract so nobody else can snag him.Offense was great at UCF defense non-existent. He lost a game to Memphis 50 to 49. Offensively over all 36 games as coach averaged over 40 points so you would expect him to eventually get the offense rolling here. The problem looks to be recruiting that will be where he eventually succeeds or fails.
I don't know what coach, but their are alot out their and yes they are coaching at other schools probably . My point is I don't think we even tried.not at all, i am saying who is this magical coach you think will agree to come here and will be a surefire winner?
A washed up NFL coach with barely a winning record and no recruiting ties whatsoever? I just don't understand why he would be considered a "better choice"I don't know what coach, but their are alot out their and yes they are coaching at other schools probably . My point is I don't think we even tried.
Heck Jeff Fisher said he would be interested did we even kick the tires on it, no we didn't. Heupel was his man all along.
Kiffin was a failure in the NFL, Saban failure in the NFL , Fisher was at least a winning coach in the NFL who could of at least put together a heck of a staff. Instead we end up with Josh Heupel. Guess maybe they just don't care.A washed up NFL coach with barely a winning record and no recruiting ties whatsoever? I just don't understand why he would be considered a "better choice"
There is no difference between Kiffin and Heupel other than Heupel has a better record and has owned him head to head.Kiffin was a failure in the NFL, Saban failure in the NFL , Fisher was at least a winning coach in the NFL who could of at least put together a heck of a staff. Instead we end up with Josh Heupel. Guess maybe they just don't care.
Or Herman, Or Kiffin, Or Cambell, Or Patterson, Or Petersen, Or Mack Brown but I'm sure UNC thought he was washed up also. We hire up and supposedly comers and get crap results. You'd think after the last three they would care .