Heisman presentation

#37
#37
Sith Vol said:
He did deserve it. No way they would be 9-3 without him.
Click to expand...

To be fair, no way Stanford is 11-1 this season or 12-1 last season without Luck.

Griffin had the best numbers though and his defense was pretty worthless. I think he was the right choice
 
#40
#40
It'd be nice to see a UT player up there one day. Only if ESPN didn't hate us.......
 
#43
#43
I think the fact that Richardson is a physical freak is a big reason he received a lot of the hype while not produces as much as say Ball. He had some nasty plays and abused some guys.
 
#47
#47
The_Orange_Pearl said:
To be fair, no way Stanford is 11-1 this season or 12-1 last season without Luck.

Griffin had the best numbers though and his defense was pretty worthless. I think he was the right choice
Click to expand...

Didn't say Luck wasn't the reason they are 11-1 right now. He definitely is the reason for those two one loss seasons.
 
#48
#48
The Heisman has a long way to go to becoming a legitimate award again but this was a huge first step. I am more than pleased to see someone who actually deserves the award get it, rather than someone who was over hyped like Tebow or Troy Smith.
 
#49
#49
Monte Ball was robbed.

Every year a QB has a year similar or even better than Griffin and play on better teams, what Ball did is so much more rare and should have rewarded.

JMO.
 
#50
#50
better year than Griffin?

I do think that Ball deserved second though. But he wasn't going to get there because of the hype train surrounding Richardson and the previous hype that had surrounded Luck for the 1st half of the season.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top